The collective voice of early phase COVID-19 vaccine trial participants: Insights for improving confidence in novel vaccines.

Tonia M Thomas, Susanne H Hodgson, Katherine Emary, Maia Patrick-Smith, Rebecca Te Water Naude, Arabella S V Stuart, John Henry, Marcus English, Maria Moore, Naomi Douglas, Andrew J Pollard, Samantha Vanderslott
Author Information
  1. Tonia M Thomas: Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK. ORCID
  2. Susanne H Hodgson: Jenner Institute, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  3. Katherine Emary: Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  4. Maia Patrick-Smith: Medical School, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  5. Rebecca Te Water Naude: Medical School, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  6. Arabella S V Stuart: Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  7. John Henry: Medical School, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  8. Marcus English: Medical School, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  9. Maria Moore: Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  10. Naomi Douglas: Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  11. Andrew J Pollard: Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford - Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
  12. Samantha Vanderslott: Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Abstract

In early 2020, adult volunteers were invited to participate in a first-in-human trial of the COVID-19 vaccine, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, in the United Kingdom (UK) at the height of the global pandemic when there was uncertainty regarding vaccine efficacy and side-effects. We conducted a retrospective survey of these uniquely situated individuals to gain insight into their views about the risks, motivations, and expectations of the trial and potential vaccine deployment. Our data from 349 respondents show that these volunteers were educated to a high-level with a clear understanding of the seriousness of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as an appreciation of the role of science and research in developing a vaccine to address this global problem. Individuals were primarily motivated with altruistic intent and expressed a desire to contribute to the scientific effort. Respondents appreciated that their participation was associated with risk but appeared comfortable that this risk was low. Through our analysis, we highlight these individuals as a group with strong levels of trust in science and a sense of societal responsibility, and therefore are a potential valuable resource to improve confidence in novel vaccines. Vaccine trial participants could offer a credible collective voice to support positive messaging around vaccination.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT04324606

References

  1. Eval Program Plann. 2020 Feb;78:101733 [PMID: 31675509]
  2. Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478 [PMID: 32702298]
  3. Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2445-2451 [PMID: 33745730]
  4. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;9(10): [PMID: 34696312]
  5. Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151 [PMID: 29590045]
  6. AIDS. 2004 Nov 19;18(17):2235-42 [PMID: 15577535]
  7. Sci Technol Human Values. 2023 Jul;48(4):909-937 [PMID: 37529348]
  8. Arch Dis Child. 2021 Feb;106(2):113-114 [PMID: 32912868]
  9. Med Decis Making. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):742-53 [PMID: 21447730]
  10. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10): [PMID: 34666989]
  11. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1950504 [PMID: 34325612]
  12. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2): [PMID: 35190459]

MeSH Term

Adult
Humans
COVID-19 Vaccines
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
Pandemics
Retrospective Studies
COVID-19
Vaccines
Vaccination

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trialvaccineCOVID-19confidenceearlyvolunteersglobalpandemicindividualspotentialsciencerisknovelvaccinesVaccineparticipantscollectivevoice2020adultinvitedparticipatefirst-in-humanChAdOx1nCoV-19UnitedKingdomUKheightuncertaintyregardingefficacyside-effectsconductedretrospectivesurveyuniquelysituatedgaininsightviewsrisksmotivationsexpectationsdeploymentdata349respondentsshoweducatedhigh-levelclearunderstandingseriousnesswellappreciationroleresearchdevelopingaddressproblemIndividualsprimarilymotivatedaltruisticintentexpresseddesirecontributescientificeffortRespondentsappreciatedparticipationassociatedappearedcomfortablelowanalysishighlightgroupstronglevelstrustsensesocietalresponsibilitythereforevaluableresourceimproveoffercrediblesupportpositivemessagingaroundvaccinationphaseparticipants:Insightsimproving

Similar Articles

Cited By