Social Media Listening and Digital Profiling Study of People With Headache and Migraine: Retrospective Infodemiology Study.

Peter Goadsby, Elena Ruiz de la Torre, Luminita Constantin, Caroline Amand
Author Information
  1. Peter Goadsby: NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Elena Ruiz de la Torre: European Migraine and Headache Alliance, Brussels, Belgium. ORCID
  3. Luminita Constantin: Sanofi, Gentilly, France. ORCID
  4. Caroline Amand: Sanofi, Gentilly, France. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet need for a better understanding and management of headache, particularly migraine, beyond specialist centers, which may be facilitated using digital technology.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify where, when, and how people with headache and migraine describe their symptoms and the nonpharmaceutical and medicinal treatments used as indicated on social media.
METHODS: Social media sources, including Twitter, web-based forums, blogs, YouTube, and review sites, were searched using a predefined search string related to headache and migraine. The real-time data from social media posts were collected retrospectively for a 1-year period from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018 (Japan), or a 2-year period from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018 (Germany and France). The data were analyzed after collection, using content analysis and audience profiling.
RESULTS: A total of 3,509,828 social media posts related to headache and migraine were obtained from Japan in 1 year and 146,257 and 306,787 posts from Germany and France, respectively, in 2 years. Among social media sites, Twitter was the most used platform across these countries. Japanese sufferers used specific terminology, such as "tension headaches" or "cluster headaches" (36%), whereas French sufferers even mentioned specific migraine types, such as ocular (7%) and aura (2%). The most detailed posts on headache or migraine were from Germany. The French sufferers explicitly mentioned "headache or migraine attacks" in the "evening (41%) or morning (38%)," whereas Japanese mentioned "morning (48%) or night (27%)" and German sufferers mentioned "evening (22%) or night (41%)." The use of "generic terms" such as medicine, tablet, and pill were prevalent. The most discussed drugs were ibuprofen and naproxen combination (43%) in Japan; ibuprofen (29%) in Germany; and acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, and caffeine combination (75%) in France. The top 3 nonpharmaceutical treatments are hydration, caffeinated beverages, and relaxation methods. Of the sufferers, 44% were between 18 and 24 years of age.
CONCLUSIONS: In this digital era, social media listening studies present an opportunity to provide unguided, self-reported, sufferers' perceptions in the real world. The generation of social media evidence requires appropriate methodology to translate data into scientific information and relevant medical insights. This social media listening study showed country-specific differences in headache and migraine symptoms experienced and in the times of the day and treatments used. Furthermore, this study highlighted the prevalence of social media usage by younger sufferers compared to that by older sufferers.

Keywords

References

  1. J Headache Pain. 2020 Dec 2;21(1):137 [PMID: 33267788]
  2. J Headache Pain. 2021 Jul 19;22(1):76 [PMID: 34281500]
  3. Headache. 2019 Apr;59(4):518-531 [PMID: 30891749]
  4. JMIR Aging. 2020 Jun 3;3(1):e15491 [PMID: 32490837]
  5. J Headache Pain. 2020 Jul 6;21(1):85 [PMID: 32631274]
  6. Cephalalgia. 1997 Feb;17(1):15-22 [PMID: 9051330]
  7. J Bus Res. 2023 Jan;154:113349 [PMID: 36249711]
  8. Am J Prev Med. 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S154-8 [PMID: 21521589]
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 12;23(7):e25049 [PMID: 34255645]
  10. J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 27;19(1):115 [PMID: 30482181]
  11. J Headache Pain. 2021 Apr 1;22(1):19 [PMID: 33794761]
  12. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211 [PMID: 29368949]
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Mar 27;11(1):e11 [PMID: 19329408]
  14. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2021 Sep;177(7):725-733 [PMID: 34340812]
  15. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Jun;45:101293 [PMID: 35065352]
  16. Cephalalgia. 2019 Oct;39(12):1518-1534 [PMID: 31154807]
  17. Cephalalgia. 2019 May;39(6):687-710 [PMID: 30806518]
  18. Gerontologist. 2021 Jul 13;61(5):693-702 [PMID: 32744310]
  19. Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):343-348 [PMID: 29346005]
  20. Pain Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):153-170 [PMID: 34874543]
  21. BMC Neurol. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):274 [PMID: 32641075]
  22. Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):2014-2025 [PMID: 32920850]
  23. Drug Saf. 2016 May;39(5):443-54 [PMID: 26798054]
  24. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 04;17(3): [PMID: 32033087]
  25. P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520 [PMID: 25083128]
  26. J Headache Pain. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):68 [PMID: 31174464]
  27. Eur J Neurol. 2020 May;27(5):764-772 [PMID: 31999855]
  28. Am J Med. 2002 Dec 15;113(9):763-5 [PMID: 12517369]
  29. J Headache Pain. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):110 [PMID: 32912187]
  30. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jun 22;3(2):e36 [PMID: 28642212]
  31. Front Neurol. 2019 Oct 17;10:1000 [PMID: 31749752]
  32. Popul Health Manag. 2020 Oct;23(5):350-360 [PMID: 32897820]
  33. J Headache Pain. 2019 Apr 25;20(1):40 [PMID: 31023215]
  34. Headache. 2020 Jul;60(7):1325-1339 [PMID: 32510611]
  35. J Med Econ. 2019 Jul;22(7):616-624 [PMID: 30836035]
  36. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;45(8):597-602 [PMID: 32503862]
  37. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 20;20(11):e10466 [PMID: 30459145]
  38. J Headache Pain. 2011 Aug;12(4):419-26 [PMID: 21380555]
  39. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 19;21(6):e10479 [PMID: 31219049]
  40. Eur J Neurol. 2021 Dec;28(12):4184-4193 [PMID: 34309986]
  41. J Headache Pain. 2019 Dec 5;20(1):111 [PMID: 31805851]
  42. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 03;16(4):e96 [PMID: 24698747]
  43. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222 [PMID: 33069326]

MeSH Term

Humans
Social Media
Retrospective Studies
Ibuprofen
Infodemiology
Headache
Migraine Disorders

Chemicals

Ibuprofen

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialmediamigraineheadachesufferersusedpostsGermanymentionedusingdigitalstudysymptomstreatmentsTwitterdata12018JapanFrance"ibuprofenmanagementtechnologynonpharmaceuticalmedicinalSocialsitesrelatedperiodJanuaryDecember313yearsJapanesespecificheadaches"whereasFrench"evening41%nightdrugscombinationhydrationrelaxationlisteningStudytreatmentBACKGROUND:unmetneedbetterunderstandingparticularlybeyondspecialistcentersmayfacilitatedOBJECTIVE:objectiveidentifypeopledescribeindicatedMETHODS:sourcesincludingweb-basedforumsblogsYouTubereviewsearchedpredefinedsearchstringreal-timecollectedretrospectively1-year2-year2017analyzedcollectioncontentanalysisaudienceprofilingRESULTS:total509828obtainedyear146257306787respectively2Amongplatformacrosscountriesterminology"tension"cluster36%eventypesocular7%aura2%detailedexplicitly"headacheattacks"morning38%"morning48%27%German22%use"genericterms"medicinetabletpillprevalentdiscussednaproxen43%29%acetylsalicylicacidparacetamolcaffeine75%topcaffeinatedbeveragesmethods44%1824ageCONCLUSIONS:erastudiespresentopportunityprovideunguidedself-reportedsufferers'perceptionsrealworldgenerationevidencerequiresappropriatemethodologytranslatescientificinformationrelevantmedicalinsightsshowedcountry-specificdifferencesexperiencedtimesdayFurthermorehighlightedprevalenceusageyoungercomparedolderMediaListeningDigitalProfilingPeopleHeadacheMigraine:RetrospectiveInfodemiologyYoutubeblogbrandinternetself-managementsupport

Similar Articles

Cited By