Reduced audiovisual temporal sensitivity in Chinese children with dyslexia.

Huiduo Wu, Haidan Lu, Qing Lin, Yuhong Zhang, Qiaoyun Liu
Author Information
  1. Huiduo Wu: College of Child Development and Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Haidan Lu: Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
  3. Qing Lin: Department of Preschool Education, China Women's University, Beijing, China.
  4. Yuhong Zhang: The College of Education Science, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi, China.
  5. Qiaoyun Liu: Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Abstract

Background: Temporal processing deficits regarding audiovisual cross-modal stimuli could affect children's speed and accuracy of decoding.
Aim: To investigate the characteristics of audiovisual temporal sensitivity (ATS) in Chinese children, with and without developmental dyslexia and its impact on reading ability.
Methods: The audiovisual simultaneity judgment and temporal order judgment tasks were performed to investigate the ATS of 106 Chinese children (53 with dyslexia) aged 8 to 12 and 37 adults without a history of dyslexia. The predictive effect of children's audiovisual time binding window on their reading ability and the effects of extra cognitive processing in the temporal order judgment task on participants' ATS were also investigated.
Outcomes and results: With increasing inter-stimulus intervals, the percentage of synchronous responses in adults declined more rapidly than in children. Adults and typically developing children had significantly narrower time binding windows than children with dyslexia. The size of visual stimuli preceding auditory stimuli time binding window had a marginally significant predictive effect on children's reading fluency. Compared with the simultaneity judgment task, the extra cognitive processing of the temporal order judgment task affected children's ATS.
Conclusion and implications: The ATS of 8-12-year-old Chinese children is immature. Chinese children with dyslexia have lower ATS than their peers.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Psychol. 2016 Feb;52(2):232-41 [PMID: 26569563]
  2. Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jul;50(1):76-82 [PMID: 1881768]
  3. Biol Psychol. 2009 Feb;80(2):226-39 [PMID: 19007845]
  4. Nature. 1973 Feb 16;241(5390):468-9 [PMID: 4705758]
  5. J Learn Disabil. 2018 May/Jun;51(3):302-312 [PMID: 27940605]
  6. J Vis. 2006 Mar 16;6(3):260-8 [PMID: 16643094]
  7. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):474-80 [PMID: 16028030]
  8. Neurosci Lett. 2003 Jan 23;336(3):151-4 [PMID: 12505615]
  9. Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Mar;74:146-159 [PMID: 29413429]
  10. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jul;130:66-77 [PMID: 29588226]
  11. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Sep;198(2-3):233-44 [PMID: 19590862]
  12. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1964 Oct;34:852-61 [PMID: 14220514]
  13. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 08;8(8):e71608 [PMID: 23951203]
  14. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jun;227(2):249-61 [PMID: 23604624]
  15. Neuroscience. 2015 Aug 6;300:432-47 [PMID: 25982561]
  16. Child Dev. 2014 Mar-Apr;85(2):685-94 [PMID: 23888869]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):567-80 [PMID: 18593266]
  18. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):521-9 [PMID: 17962929]
  19. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Nov;47:384-92 [PMID: 25265514]
  20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Aug;57(4):1480-502 [PMID: 24686922]
  21. Dev Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):688-96 [PMID: 22925516]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Oct;22(5):1094-106 [PMID: 8865617]
  23. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):144-158 [PMID: 28056152]
  24. J Learn Disabil. 2019 Nov/Dec;52(6):431-441 [PMID: 31313628]
  25. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jan 3;430(1):23-8 [PMID: 18023979]
  26. Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;55:14-26 [PMID: 27022720]
  27. Ann Dyslexia. 2008 Jun;58(1):15-35 [PMID: 18483866]
  28. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Apr;26(4):407-417 [PMID: 32238215]
  29. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6449 [PMID: 33742007]
  30. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:105-23 [PMID: 25128432]
  31. Percept Psychophys. 2008 Aug;70(6):955-68 [PMID: 18717383]
  32. Brain Lang. 2000 Oct 15;75(1):66-81 [PMID: 11023639]
  33. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(2):198-210 [PMID: 12879178]
  34. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2226-9 [PMID: 20412813]
  35. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):598-607 [PMID: 16530232]
  36. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Feb;49(3):461-7 [PMID: 21134385]
  37. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 03;12:274 [PMID: 30018545]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0childrentemporaldyslexiajudgmentaudiovisualATSChinesechildren'sordertimebindingprocessingstimulisensitivityreadingsimultaneitywindowtaskcross-modalinvestigatewithoutabilityadultspredictiveeffectextracognitiveBackground:TemporaldeficitsregardingaffectspeedaccuracydecodingAim:characteristicsdevelopmentalimpactMethods:tasksperformed10653aged81237historyeffectsparticipants'alsoinvestigatedOutcomesresults:increasinginter-stimulusintervalspercentagesynchronousresponsesdeclinedrapidlyAdultstypicallydevelopingsignificantlynarrowerwindowssizevisualprecedingauditorymarginallysignificantfluencyComparedaffectedConclusionimplications:8-12-year-oldimmaturelowerpeersReduced

Similar Articles

Cited By