Study related factors associated with study engagement and student burnout among German university students.

Nils Olson, Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz, Barbara Reiner, Thorsten Schulz
Author Information
  1. Nils Olson: Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
  2. Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz: Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
  3. Barbara Reiner: Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
  4. Thorsten Schulz: Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Chair of Preventive Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.

Abstract

Introduction: Student burnout has become a health concern in higher education systems. Its prevalence rates are high due to specific demands in this life situation. It leads not only to increased academic dropout rates but is also associated with negative health outcomes both physically and mentally. Its counterpart is study engagement, which is a positive, fulfilling, study-related attitude characterized by energy, dedication, and absorption. There has not been a systematical approach covering the demands directly posed by the academic environment itself. Additionally, academic subject fields apart from medicine and nursing sciences have been mostly neglected in regards to this research field. The aim of the study is therefore to identify contributing factors for both burnout and engagement within the academic environment in a sample of different subject fields at a German university.
Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a sample of 3,451 students of all academic subjects at a technical university in Germany has been analyzed using an online survey. Sociodemographic data, study engagement, student burnout, study satisfaction, academic workload, number of semesters and occupational liabilities have been analyzed. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the associations of burnout symptoms and study engagement.
Results: Almost a third of the students showed frequent burnout symptoms, while 42.5% showed a high degree of study engagement with no differences in gender. Age was identified as a risk factor for frequent signs of cynicism (OR = 1.073). Study satisfaction (OR between 0.459 and 0.702), semester progression (OR = 0.959) and working moderately (OR between 0.605 and 0.637) was associated with fewer symptoms in different burnout-dimensions. Study satisfaction is positively associated with study engagement (OR = 2.676). Academic workload is positively related to both burnout (OR between 1.014 and 1.021) and study engagement (OR = 1.014).
Discussion: A substantial number of students show frequent symptoms of burnout and the majority is not highly engaged. The included factors contribute to the model to various degrees and show that university-bound factors play a major role. Fostering a supportive environment is key for study engagement, health and well-being. The inclusion of further, individual factors should be a future concern in order to find and promote strategies for a healthy education system.

Keywords

References

  1. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 9;100(27):e26589 [PMID: 34232207]
  2. Psychol Rep. 2009 Oct;105(2):394-408 [PMID: 19928601]
  3. Can Med Educ J. 2017 Jun 30;8(3):e90-e108 [PMID: 29098051]
  4. Clin Med Res. 2020 Mar;18(1):3-10 [PMID: 31959669]
  5. Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Mar;84(Pt 1):137-51 [PMID: 24547758]
  6. Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;55:36-42 [PMID: 30384110]
  7. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(15):e0326 [PMID: 29642167]
  8. Stress Health. 2013 Oct;29(4):297-306 [PMID: 23086898]
  9. Hum Resour Health. 2020 Jun 5;18(1):41 [PMID: 32503559]
  10. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Apr;28(7-8):1273-1288 [PMID: 30549352]
  11. Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 20;10:2889 [PMID: 31920897]
  12. J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529 [PMID: 29505159]
  13. J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512 [PMID: 11419809]
  14. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Jan;30(1):78-84 [PMID: 19632748]
  15. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Apr 24;7:227-33 [PMID: 25941444]
  16. PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0191746 [PMID: 29513668]
  17. Cureus. 2020 Jan 12;12(1):e6633 [PMID: 31966946]
  18. Clin Teach. 2013 Aug;10(4):242-5 [PMID: 23834570]
  19. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2013 Feb;63(2):77-84 [PMID: 23408302]
  20. JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):952-60 [PMID: 21900135]
  21. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jul;43(1):71-81 [PMID: 12801398]
  22. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Sep 2;149(5):334-41 [PMID: 18765703]

MeSH Term

Humans
Universities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Burnout, Psychological
Burnout, Professional
Students