Pooled RNA-extraction-free testing of saliva for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Orchid M Allicock, Devyn Yolda-Carr, John A Todd, Anne L Wyllie
Author Information
  1. Orchid M Allicock: Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
  2. Devyn Yolda-Carr: Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
  3. John A Todd: SalivaDirect, Inc, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
  4. Anne L Wyllie: Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. anne.wyllie@yale.edu.

Abstract

The key to limiting SARS-CoV-2 spread is to identify virus-infected individuals (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) and isolate them from the general population. Hence, routine weekly testing for SARS-CoV-2 in all asymptomatic (capturing both infected and non-infected) individuals is considered critical in situations where a large number of individuals co-congregate such as schools, prisons, aged care facilities and industrial workplaces. Such testing is hampered by operational issues such as cost, test availability, access to healthcare workers and throughput. We developed the SalivaDirect RT-qPCR assay to increase access to SARS-CoV-2 testing via a low-cost, streamlined protocol using self-collected saliva. To expand the single sample testing protocol, we explored multiple extraction-free pooled saliva testing workflows prior to testing with the SalivaDirect RT-qPCR assay. A pool size of five, with or without heat inactivation at 65 ��C for 15 min prior to testing resulted in a positive agreement of 98% and 89%, respectively, and an increased Ct value shift of 1.37 and 1.99 as compared to individual testing of the positive clinical saliva specimens. Applying this shift in Ct value to 316 individual, sequentially collected, SARS-CoV-2 positive saliva specimen results reported from six clinical laboratories using the original SalivaDirect assay, 100% of the samples would have been detected (Ct value���<���45) had they been tested in the 1:5 pool strategy. The availability of multiple pooled testing workflows for laboratories can increase test turnaround time, permitting results in a more actionable time frame while minimizing testing costs and changes to laboratory operational flow.

References

  1. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 25;12(7): [PMID: 35885453]
  2. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2023 Sep;182:103-108 [PMID: 37369293]
  3. J Vis Exp. 2022 Feb 11;(180): [PMID: 35225290]
  4. Science. 2020 May 1;368(6490):489-493 [PMID: 32179701]
  5. Adv Virol. 2022 Jun 1;2022:7442907 [PMID: 35693127]
  6. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 19;11(5): [PMID: 34069462]
  7. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;27(4): [PMID: 33755009]
  8. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):284 [PMID: 35337266]
  9. J Infect. 2020 Dec;81(6):931-936 [PMID: 33068628]
  10. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 13;16(9):e0257169 [PMID: 34516569]
  11. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0012822 [PMID: 35311575]
  12. Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0108921 [PMID: 34643445]
  13. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):562-564 [PMID: 33887248]
  14. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0263033 [PMID: 35089942]
  15. BMC Med. 2021 Apr 27;19(1):106 [PMID: 33902581]
  16. Med. 2021 Mar 12;2(3):263-280.e6 [PMID: 33521748]
  17. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 24;10(1):15665 [PMID: 32973285]
  18. Sci Rep. 2022 May 16;12(1):8082 [PMID: 35577836]
  19. JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1406-1407 [PMID: 32083643]
  20. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101028 [PMID: 34308321]
  21. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 25;17(1):e0263114 [PMID: 35077513]
  22. J Mol Diagn. 2021 Jul;23(7):788-795 [PMID: 33957320]
  23. Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):676-680 [PMID: 32371934]
  24. J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Feb 16;60(2):e0178521 [PMID: 34911366]
  25. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016818 [PMID: 32735339]
  26. Sci Transl Med. 2021 Apr 14;13(589): [PMID: 33619081]
  27. Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0031221 [PMID: 34378949]
  28. Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Dec 1;100(12):808-814 [PMID: 36466209]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR001863/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
SARS-CoV-2
Saliva
RNA
Specimen Handling
RNA, Viral

Chemicals

RNA
RNA, Viral

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0testingSARS-CoV-2salivaindividualsSalivaDirectassaypositiveCtasymptomaticoperationaltestavailabilityaccessRT-qPCRincreaseprotocolusingmultiplepooledworkflowspriorpoolvalueshift1individualclinicalresultslaboratoriestimekeylimitingspreadidentifyvirus-infectedsymptomaticisolategeneralpopulationHenceroutineweeklycapturinginfectednon-infectedconsideredcriticalsituationslargenumberco-congregateschoolsprisonsagedcarefacilitiesindustrialworkplaceshamperedissuescosthealthcareworkersthroughputdevelopedvialow-coststreamlinedself-collectedexpandsinglesampleexploredextraction-freesizefivewithoutheatinactivation65 ��C15 minresultedagreement98%89%respectivelyincreased3799comparedspecimensApplying316sequentiallycollectedspecimenreportedsixoriginal100%samplesdetectedvalue���<���45tested1:5strategycanturnaroundpermittingactionableframeminimizingcostschangeslaboratoryflowPooledRNA-extraction-freedetection

Similar Articles

Cited By