A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool.

Brittany M Woods, Leigh Ann Bray, Sukhkamal Campbell, Aimee Holland, Sylvie Mrug, Sigrid Ladores
Author Information
  1. Brittany M Woods: University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 1720 2nd Avenue South, NB482, AL, 35294-1210, Birmingham, USA. brittwoods@uab.edu.
  2. Leigh Ann Bray: University of Alabama Capstone College of Nursing, Office 3160, Box 870358, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
  3. Sukhkamal Campbell: Fertility Preservation Services, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medicine, 1700 6Th Ave South, Women and Infants Center 10390, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
  4. Aimee Holland: Graduate Clinical Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 1720 2nd Avenue South, NB 406A, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1210, USA.
  5. Sylvie Mrug: University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave South, CH415, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  6. Sigrid Ladores: University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, 1720 2nd Avenue South, NB422, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1210, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze and synthesize the reported psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) instrument and describe its implications for use in practice and research in men and women with infertility.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all articles using the FertiQoL tool. PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from September 2006 through May 2022. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported psychometric data on the original FertiQoL tool using a sample population of individuals with infertility. Sample size, country of origin, and psychometric data were documented for each study.
RESULTS: The initial search revealed 153 articles that had utilized the FertiQoL. Following abstract, title, and full-text screenings, 53 articles reported psychometric data and met criteria for inclusion. The FertiQoL is a sound measurement with satisfactory reliability and validity. Studies indicated adequate reliability in the overall scale ([Formula: see text]), as well as the core Emotional, Mind/Body, Social, and Relational scales ([Formula: see text]) and two optional Tolerability and Environment fertility treatment subscales ([Formula: see text]). Although the Relational subscale exhibited slightly lower reliability in several studies, the internal consistency for the measurement as a whole was satisfactory. Results also indicate adequate: 1) face and content validity with extensive professional and patient feedback during development; 2) convergent validity with general quality of life, depression, and anxiety measurements; and 3) structural validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses.
CONCLUSION: The FertiQoL tool is the most commonly used instrument to measure the impact of fertility issues on quality of life in men and women with infertility. Understanding the impact of infertility on quality of life provides valuable insight into the areas of infertility-related care that need to be prioritized, such as mental health or relational stressors. While the instrument has been used in different patient populations with infertility and available in multiple translations, it is necessary to understand the updated psychometric properties and the implications for its use. This review shows that the FertiQoL is reliable and valid for cross-cultural use among individuals with various etiologies of infertility.

Keywords

References

  1. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022 Apr;40(2):108-117 [PMID: 32602747]
  2. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016 Sep;19(3):186-91 [PMID: 27486018]
  3. J Holist Nurs. 2018 Mar;36(1):6-14 [PMID: 29436974]
  4. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021 Apr;57(2):717-725 [PMID: 32776595]
  5. Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2664-2672 [PMID: 33630423]
  6. J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(6):738-749 [PMID: 27881623]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 09;18(12): [PMID: 34207782]
  8. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2021 Oct;24(4):236-248 [PMID: 31387469]
  9. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jun;10(6):e773 [PMID: 35561706]
  10. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):2082-2088 [PMID: 35068321]
  11. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2002 Jun;2(3):194-9 [PMID: 12099195]
  12. Psychol Health Med. 2017 Feb;22(2):145-151 [PMID: 26892628]
  13. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun;22(6):1506-12 [PMID: 17376819]
  14. Health Soc Work. 2005 Aug;30(3):183-91 [PMID: 16190294]
  15. Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1635-42 [PMID: 25954036]
  16. Behav Res Ther. 2016 Feb;77:96-104 [PMID: 26742022]
  17. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 24;16(1):73 [PMID: 29690877]
  18. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021 May;50(3):275-288 [PMID: 33497688]
  19. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Jul;25(3):456-469 [PMID: 32985277]
  20. Am J Mens Health. 2021 Mar-Apr;15(2):1557988320982167 [PMID: 33834914]
  21. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Jun;145:110465 [PMID: 33820644]
  22. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jul;16(3):329-341 [PMID: 30525294]
  23. Holist Nurs Pract. 2019 Sep/Oct;33(5):303-311 [PMID: 31415010]
  24. J Sex Med. 2021 Dec;18(12):1984-1997 [PMID: 34702685]
  25. Stress Health. 2020 Dec;36(5):654-662 [PMID: 32472734]
  26. Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):63 [PMID: 23095139]
  27. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 25;19(1):32 [PMID: 33494768]
  28. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019 Feb;37(1):13-25 [PMID: 30468393]
  29. Nurs Health Sci. 2015 Mar;17(1):84-89 [PMID: 25263133]
  30. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Nov;74(11):1009-1015 [PMID: 25484375]
  31. Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2061-71 [PMID: 27343271]
  32. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356 [PMID: 23271957]
  33. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020 Jul;38(3):324-339 [PMID: 31820662]
  34. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021 Nov;50(6):e1-e12 [PMID: 34310903]
  35. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Mar;43(1):35-41 [PMID: 32633181]
  36. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 27;15(1):86 [PMID: 28449717]
  37. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):38 [PMID: 30770738]
  38. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 [PMID: 6880820]
  39. Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec;31(12):2772-2780 [PMID: 27664215]
  40. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1775-1787 [PMID: 32112277]
  41. Hum Reprod. 2011 May;26(5):1112-8 [PMID: 21372046]
  42. Fertil Steril. 2015 Aug;104(2):440-51.e7 [PMID: 26072382]
  43. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:241-246 [PMID: 34340094]
  44. Int J Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(4):371-379 [PMID: 28042418]
  45. Hum Reprod. 2013 Sep;28(9):2462-72 [PMID: 23820421]
  46. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Mar;97(3):269-276 [PMID: 29247514]
  47. NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Sep;(378):1-8 [PMID: 33054928]
  48. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 24;14:27 [PMID: 26911144]
  49. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019 Nov;37(5):455-467 [PMID: 30724578]
  50. Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1255-1265 [PMID: 34607703]
  51. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jul;72(1):54-62 [PMID: 10428148]
  52. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 1;18(1):295 [PMID: 32873294]
  53. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Dec 17;16(1):233 [PMID: 30558633]
  54. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;20(1):41-47 [PMID: 29946210]
  55. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015 Jul;12(3):208-21 [PMID: 25302746]
  56. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Mar;16(3):191-198 [PMID: 29766150]
  57. Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):54-61 [PMID: 33309062]
  58. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Jul;47(4):498-508 [PMID: 29715441]
  59. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):122-8 [PMID: 1730305]
  60. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91 [PMID: 21665875]
  61. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):386 [PMID: 34727911]
  62. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):176-80 [PMID: 23347604]
  63. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2022 Jul;25(3):540-547 [PMID: 33432870]
  64. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):646-54 [PMID: 24007764]

MeSH Term

Male
Humans
Female
Quality of Life
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Fertility
Infertility
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0psychometricinfertilitylifeusevalidityqualityreportedpropertiesinstrumentimplicationsarticlesusingdatareliability[Formula:seetext]fertilityreviewQualitymenwomensearchinclusionindividualsmeasurementsatisfactoryRelationalpatientusedimpactOBJECTIVES:analyzesynthesize theFertilityLifeFertiQoLdescribepracticeresearchMETHODS:systematicliteratureperformedidentifythe FertiQoL toolPubMedCINAHLPsycINFOsearchedSeptember2006May2022 Studieseligibleoriginal FertiQoL toolsamplepopulationSamplesizecountryorigindocumentedstudyRESULTS:initialrevealed153utilizedthe FertiQoL Followingabstracttitlefull-textscreenings53metcriteria The FertiQoL issoundStudiesindicatedadequateoverallscalewellcoreEmotionalMind/BodySocialscalestwooptionalTolerabilityEnvironmenttreatmentsubscalesAlthoughsubscaleexhibitedslightlylowerseveralstudiesinternalconsistencywholeResultsalsoindicateadequate:1facecontentextensiveprofessionalfeedbackdevelopment2convergentgeneraldepressionanxietymeasurements3structuralconfirmatoryexploratoryfactoranalysesCONCLUSION:The FertiQoL toolcommonlymeasureissues Understandingprovidesvaluableinsightareasinfertility-relatedcareneedprioritizedmentalhealthrelationalstressorsdifferentpopulationsavailablemultipletranslationsnecessaryunderstandupdatedshowsthe FertiQoL isreliablevalidcross-culturalamongvariousetiologiestoolInfertilityPsychometricsSystematic

Similar Articles

Cited By