Heterogeneous Catalysts for Glycerol Biorefineries: Hydrogenolysis to 1,2-Propylene Glycol.

Martín N Gatti, Federico M Perez, Gerardo F Santori, Nora N Nichio, Francisco Pompeo
Author Information
  1. Martín N Gatti: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas (CINDECA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)-CONICET, Calle 47, 257, La Plata 1900, Argentina. ORCID
  2. Federico M Perez: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas (CINDECA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)-CONICET, Calle 47, 257, La Plata 1900, Argentina. ORCID
  3. Gerardo F Santori: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas (CINDECA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)-CONICET, Calle 47, 257, La Plata 1900, Argentina.
  4. Nora N Nichio: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas (CINDECA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)-CONICET, Calle 47, 257, La Plata 1900, Argentina.
  5. Francisco Pompeo: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas (CINDECA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)-CONICET, Calle 47, 257, La Plata 1900, Argentina. ORCID

Abstract

Research on the use of biomass resources for the generation of energy and chemical compounds is of great interest worldwide. The development and growth of the biodiesel industry has led to a parallel market for the supply of glycerol, its main by-product. Its wide availability and relatively low cost as a raw material make glycerol a basic component for obtaining various chemical products and allows for the development of a biorefinery around biodiesel plants, through the technological integration of different production processes. This work proposes a review of one of the reactions of interest in the biorefinery environment: the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,2-propylene glycol. The article reviews more than 300 references, covering literature from about 20 years, focusing on the heterogeneous catalysts used for the production of glycol. In this sense, from about 175 catalysts, between bulk and supported ones, were revised and discussed critically, based on noble metals, such as Ru, Pt, Pd, and non-noble metals as Cu, Ni, Co, both in liquid (2-10 MPa, 120-260 °C) and vapor phase (0.1 MPa, 200-300 °C). Then, the effect of the main operational and decision variables, such as temperature, pressure, catalyst/glycerol mass ratio, space velocity, and H flow, are discussed, depending on the reactors employed. Finally, the formulation of several kinetic models and stability studies are presented, discussing the main deactivation mechanisms of the catalytic systems such as coking, leaching, and sintering, and the presence of impurities in the glycerol feed. It is expected that this work will serve as a tool for the development of more efficient catalytic materials and processes towards the future projection of glycerol biorefineries.

Keywords

References

  1. Molecules. 2020 May 28;25(11): [PMID: 32481583]
  2. Langmuir. 2009 Jun 2;25(11):6425-30 [PMID: 19368338]
  3. ChemSusChem. 2013 Aug;6(8):1345-7 [PMID: 23794444]
  4. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014 Apr;14(4):3137-46 [PMID: 24734746]
  5. ChemSusChem. 2017 Jan 20;10(2):442-454 [PMID: 27863078]
  6. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jan;104:814-7 [PMID: 22137273]
  7. Chemistry. 2011 Dec 9;17(50):14288-99 [PMID: 22069214]
  8. ChemSusChem. 2011 Aug 22;4(8):1143-50 [PMID: 21714100]
  9. J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Aug 17;133(32):12675-89 [PMID: 21736345]
  10. Bioresour Technol. 2010 Sep;101(18):7099-103 [PMID: 20434331]
  11. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015 Jan;15(1):656-9 [PMID: 26328420]
  12. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016 Feb;16(2):1952-60 [PMID: 27433708]
  13. ChemSusChem. 2021 Jan 21;14(2):569-581 [PMID: 33219614]
  14. Bioresour Technol. 2012 May;111:500-3 [PMID: 22386627]
  15. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2016;80(2):215-20 [PMID: 26428060]
  16. Chem Asian J. 2010 May 3;5(5):1100-11 [PMID: 20352611]
  17. J Phys Chem A. 2006 May 11;110(18):6145-56 [PMID: 16671686]
  18. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015 Nov;15(11):8783-9 [PMID: 26726594]
  19. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Dec 21;51(52):13163-7 [PMID: 23161647]
  20. Langmuir. 2011 May 17;27(10):6244-51 [PMID: 21480615]
  21. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Apr 14;13(14):6462-70 [PMID: 21369602]
  22. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018 Mar 09;8(3): [PMID: 29522432]

Grants

  1. PIP 065/National Scientific and Technical Research Council
  2. I 248/National University of La Plata

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0glycerol1developmentbiodieselmainglycolcatalystschemicalinterestbiorefineryproductionprocessesworkhydrogenolysis2-propyleneheterogeneousdiscussedmetalsMPa°CcatalyticResearchusebiomassresourcesgenerationenergycompoundsgreatworldwidegrowthindustryledparallelmarketsupplyby-productwideavailabilityrelativelylowcostrawmaterialmakebasiccomponentobtainingvariousproductsallowsaroundplantstechnologicalintegrationdifferentproposesreviewonereactionsenvironment:articlereviews300referencescoveringliterature20yearsfocusingusedsense175bulksupportedonesrevisedcriticallybasednobleRuPtPdnon-nobleCuNiColiquid2-10120-260vaporphase0200-300effectoperationaldecisionvariablestemperaturepressurecatalyst/glycerolmassratiospacevelocityHflowdependingreactorsemployedFinallyformulationseveralkineticmodelsstabilitystudiespresenteddiscussingdeactivationmechanismssystemscokingleachingsinteringpresenceimpuritiesfeedexpectedwillservetoolefficientmaterialstowardsfutureprojectionbiorefineriesHeterogeneousCatalystsGlycerolBiorefineries:Hydrogenolysis2-PropyleneGlycol

Similar Articles

Cited By