Potential of Novel Magnesium Nanomaterials to Manage Bacterial Spot Disease of Tomato in Greenhouse and Field Conditions.

Ying-Yu Liao, Jorge Pereira, Ziyang Huang, Qiurong Fan, Swadeshmukul Santra, Jason C White, Roberto De La Torre-Roche, Susannah Da Silva, Gary E Vallad, Joshua H Freeman, Jeffrey B Jones, Mathews L Paret
Author Information
  1. Ying-Yu Liao: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
  2. Jorge Pereira: Department of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. ORCID
  3. Ziyang Huang: Department of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. ORCID
  4. Qiurong Fan: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
  5. Swadeshmukul Santra: Department of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. ORCID
  6. Jason C White: Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
  7. Roberto De La Torre-Roche: Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
  8. Susannah Da Silva: North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, FL 32351, USA.
  9. Gary E Vallad: Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL 33598, USA.
  10. Joshua H Freeman: North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Quincy, FL 32351, USA.
  11. Jeffrey B Jones: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. ORCID
  12. Mathews L Paret: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.

Abstract

Bacterial spot of tomato is among the most economically relevant diseases affecting tomato plants globally. In previous studies, non-formulated magnesium oxide nanoparticles (nano-MgOs) significantly reduced the disease severity in greenhouse and field conditions. However, the aggregation of nano-MgO in liquid suspension makes it challenging to use in field applications. Therefore, we formulated two novel MgO nanomaterials (SgMg #3 and SgMg #2.5) and one MgOH nanomaterial (SgMc) and evaluated their physical characteristics, antibacterial properties, and disease reduction abilities. Among the three Mg nanomaterials, SgMc showed the highest efficacy against copper-tolerant strains of in vitro, and provided disease reduction in the greenhouse experiments compared with commercial Cu bactericide and an untreated control. However, SgMc was not consistently effective in field conditions. To determine the cause of its inconsistent efficacy in different environments, we monitored particle size, zeta potential, morphology, and crystallinity for all three formulated materials and nano-MgOs. The MgO particle size was determined by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques. An X-ray diffraction (XRD) study confirmed a change in the crystallinity of MgO from a periclase to an Mg(OH) brucite crystal structure. As a result, the bactericidal activity correlated with the high crystallinity present in nano-MgOs and SgMc, while the inconsistent antimicrobial potency of SgMg #3 and SgMg #2.5 might have been related to loss of crystallinity. Future studies are needed to determine which specific variables impair the performance of these nanomaterials in the field compared to under greenhouse conditions. Although SgMc did not lead to significant disease severity reduction in the field, it still has the potential to act as an alternative to Cu against bacterial spot disease in tomato transplant production.

Keywords

References

  1. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004 Nov;27(6):755-62 [PMID: 15612634]
  2. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 04;10:1171 [PMID: 31649687]
  3. J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Aug 22;66(33):8679-8686 [PMID: 30025447]
  4. Phytopathology. 2019 Jan;109(1):52-62 [PMID: 30070617]
  5. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015 Dec;16(9):907-20 [PMID: 25649754]
  6. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 15;44(6):1962-7 [PMID: 20151631]
  7. Water Sci Technol. 2010;61(1):127-33 [PMID: 20057098]
  8. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Jun 16;11(6): [PMID: 34208716]
  9. Water Res. 2008 Apr;42(8-9):2204-12 [PMID: 18164742]
  10. Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5 [PMID: 22930834]
  11. Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Oct 19;55(20):13561-13570 [PMID: 34291924]
  12. Small. 2014 Mar 26;10(6):1171-83 [PMID: 24344000]
  13. Plant Dis. 2005 Jul;89(7):712-716 [PMID: 30791240]
  14. Nanotechnology. 2021 Aug 19;32(45): [PMID: 34352732]
  15. Langmuir. 2021 Nov 16;37(45):13379-13389 [PMID: 34637312]
  16. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 6;9(1):18530 [PMID: 31811183]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diseasefieldSgMccrystallinitySgMgtomatonano-MgOsgreenhouseconditionsMgOnanomaterialsreductionBacterialspotstudiesnanoparticlesseverityHoweverformulated#3#25threeMgefficacycomparedCudetermineinconsistentparticlesizepotentialantimicrobialamongeconomicallyrelevantdiseasesaffectingplantsgloballypreviousnon-formulatedmagnesiumoxidesignificantlyreducedaggregationnano-MgOliquidsuspensionmakeschallenginguseapplicationsThereforetwonoveloneMgOHnanomaterialevaluatedphysicalcharacteristicsantibacterialpropertiesabilitiesAmongshowedhighestcopper-tolerantstrainsvitroprovidedexperimentscommercialbactericideuntreatedcontrolconsistentlyeffectivecausedifferentenvironmentsmonitoredzetamorphologymaterialsdeterminedscanningelectronmicroscopySEMdynamiclightscatteringDLStechniquesX-raydiffractionXRDstudyconfirmedchangepericlaseOHbrucitecrystalstructureresultbactericidalactivitycorrelatedhighpresentpotencymightrelatedlossFutureneededspecificvariablesimpairperformanceAlthoughleadsignificantstillactalternativebacterialtransplantproductionPotentialNovelMagnesiumNanomaterialsManageSpotDiseaseTomatoGreenhouseFieldConditionsXanthomonasperforanscropprotection

Similar Articles

Cited By