Connection between right-to-left shunt and photosensitivity: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Bosi Dong, Shuming Ji, Yajiao Li, Hua Li, Ruiqi Yang, Na Yang, Zhu Liu, Chenxing Zhu, Hui Wang, Yusha Tang, Anjiao Peng, Lei Chen
Author Information
  1. Bosi Dong: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  2. Shuming Ji: Department of Clinical Research Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  3. Yajiao Li: Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  4. Hua Li: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  5. Ruiqi Yang: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  6. Na Yang: Department of Clinical Research Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  7. Zhu Liu: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  8. Chenxing Zhu: Department of Clinical Research Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  9. Hui Wang: Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  10. Yusha Tang: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  11. Anjiao Peng: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  12. Lei Chen: Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Abstract

Background: Hypersensitivity to light is a common symptom associated with dysfunction of the occipital region. Earlier studies also suggested that clinically significant right-to-left shunt (RLS) could increase occipital cortical excitability associated with the occurrence of migraine. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between RLS and photosensitivity.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included the residents aged 18-55 years living in the Mianzhu community between November 2021 and October 2022. Photosensitivity was evaluated using the Photosensitivity Assessment Questionnaire along with baseline clinical data through face-to-face interviews. After the interviews, contrast-transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) was performed to detect RLS. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to reduce selection bias. Photosensitivity score was compared between individuals with and without significant RLS using multivariable linear regression based on IPW.
Results: A total of 829 participants containing 759 healthy controls and 70 migraineurs were finally included in the analysis. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that migraine (β = 0.422; 95% CI: 0.086-0.759; = 0.014) and clinically significant RLS (β = 1.115; 95% CI: 0.760-1.470; < 0.001) were related to higher photosensitivity score. Subgroup analysis revealed that clinically significant RLS had a positive effect on hypersensitivity to light in the healthy population (β = 0.763; 95% CI: 0.332-1.195; < 0.001) or migraineurs (β = 1.459; 95% CI: 0.271-2.647; = 0.010). There was also a significant interaction between RLS and migraine for the association with photophobia ( = 0.009).
Conclusion: RLS is associated with photosensitivity independently and might exacerbate photophobia in migraineurs. Future studies with RLS closure are needed to validate the findings.
Trial registration: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, , ID: ChiCTR1900024623, URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=40590.

Keywords

References

  1. Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):217-226 [PMID: 33040593]
  2. J Neuroophthalmol. 2022 Sep 1;42(3):378-383 [PMID: 35421036]
  3. Jpn Heart J. 2002 Jul;43(4):389-98 [PMID: 12227714]
  4. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;105(6):751-760 [PMID: 32703784]
  5. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Apr;39(4):704-717 [PMID: 28885085]
  6. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74 [PMID: 14651415]
  7. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220637 [PMID: 31369637]
  8. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(3-4):152-160 [PMID: 28088807]
  9. Brain. 2005 Sep;128(Pt 9):2068-77 [PMID: 16006538]
  10. Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808 [PMID: 23771276]
  11. Cephalalgia. 2016 May;36(6):526-33 [PMID: 26378082]
  12. Cortex. 2021 Apr;137:205-214 [PMID: 33640852]
  13. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019 Oct;25(5):1194-1214 [PMID: 31584534]
  14. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jul;38(8):1493-1497 [PMID: 29020806]
  15. Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14):1419-24 [PMID: 18794393]
  16. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Oct 10;13:1756286420964673 [PMID: 33425013]
  17. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Feb;13(2):239-45 [PMID: 20062053]
  18. Headache. 2014 Jul-Aug;54(7):1146-57 [PMID: 24913618]
  19. Headache. 2020 Mar;60(3):506-514 [PMID: 31965576]
  20. Brain. 2020 Feb 1;143(2):541-553 [PMID: 31919494]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4687-92 [PMID: 11287655]
  22. Epilepsy Behav. 2013 May;27(2):301-6 [PMID: 23518608]
  23. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul-Aug;61(4):466-77 [PMID: 26875996]
  24. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Dec;1(6):e001735 [PMID: 23316313]
  25. Intern Med. 2023 Mar 15;62(6):849-854 [PMID: 35989269]
  26. Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Jun;95(4):254-261 [PMID: 30814165]
  27. Ann Neurol. 2010 Feb;67(2):221-9 [PMID: 20225282]
  28. Headache. 2011 Nov-Dec;51(10):1520-8 [PMID: 22082422]
  29. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1866-1876 [PMID: 33211930]
  30. Headache. 2020 Sep;60(8):1644-1652 [PMID: 32789863]
  31. Neuroimage Clin. 2017 May 22;15:367-375 [PMID: 28580293]
  32. Ann Neurol. 2011 May;69(5):855-65 [PMID: 21416489]
  33. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Aug;131(8):2047-2055 [PMID: 32600960]
  34. Cephalalgia. 2019 Apr;39(5):635-640 [PMID: 30296840]
  35. AIDS Behav. 2013 Jun;17(5):1764-9 [PMID: 23605154]
  36. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):249-251 [PMID: 29915769]
  37. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010 Jan;11(1):57-63 [PMID: 19910318]
  38. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Aug;28(8):910-58 [PMID: 26239900]
  39. J Headache Pain. 2020 Apr 15;21(1):33 [PMID: 32295535]
  40. Headache. 2019 Feb;59(2):253-258 [PMID: 30620050]
  41. Mol Brain. 2022 Dec 5;15(1):99 [PMID: 36471383]
  42. Neuroscience. 2013 Dec 3;253:341-9 [PMID: 24036374]
  43. Pain. 2009 Oct;145(3):358-363 [PMID: 19674842]
  44. Headache. 2020 Feb;60(2):416-429 [PMID: 31837007]
  45. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13(4):466-79 [PMID: 26412066]
  46. Brain Sci. 2022 Jul 18;12(7): [PMID: 35884747]
  47. J Headache Pain. 2019 May 29;20(1):63 [PMID: 31142262]
  48. Rev Clin Esp. 2009 Mar;209(3):136-40 [PMID: 19445849]
  49. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Apr 1;145(4):307-312 [PMID: 30676633]
  50. Cephalalgia. 2008 May;28(5):531-40 [PMID: 18355348]
  51. Cephalalgia. 1991 Jul;11(3):129-34 [PMID: 1889068]
  52. Stroke. 2004 Jan;35(1):46-50 [PMID: 14657451]
  53. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(2):107-13 [PMID: 19463410]
  54. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 Jul-Dec;5(3-4):179-206 [PMID: 8736031]
  55. Headache. 2021 May;61(5):740-754 [PMID: 33779989]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00RLS=studysignificantmigrainephotosensitivityβ95%CI:associatedclinicallyright-to-leftshuntcross-sectionalPhotosensitivitymigraineursanalysislightoccipitalstudiesalsoincludedusinginterviewsIPWscorelinearregression759healthy1<001photophobiacommunity-basedBackground:HypersensitivitycommonsymptomdysfunctionregionEarliersuggestedincreasecorticalexcitabilityoccurrenceaiminvestigaterelationshipMethods:observationalresidentsaged18-55yearslivingMianzhucommunityNovember2021October2022evaluatedAssessmentQuestionnairealongbaselineclinicaldataface-to-facecontrast-transthoracicechocardiographycTTEperformeddetectInverseprobabilityweightingusedreduceselectionbiascomparedindividualswithoutmultivariablebasedResults:total829participantscontainingcontrols70finallyMultivariableshowed422086-0014115760-1470relatedhigherSubgrouprevealedpositiveeffecthypersensitivitypopulation763332-1195459271-2647010interactionassociation009Conclusion:independentlymightexacerbateFutureclosureneededvalidatefindingsTrialregistration:registeredChineseClinicalTrialRegisterID:ChiCTR1900024623URL:https://wwwchictrorgcn/showprojhtml?proj=40590Connectionphotosensitivity:

Similar Articles

Cited By