The multidimensional nature of attitudes towards preventive vaccinations - a cross-sectional survey among Poles aged 15-39 years.

Filip Raciborski, Aneta Tomaszewska, Kamil Rakocy, Piotr Samel-Kowalik, Bolesław Samoliński, Mariusz Gujski, Jarosław Pinkas, Mateusz Jankowski
Author Information
  1. Filip Raciborski: Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology).
  2. Aneta Tomaszewska: Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology).
  3. Kamil Rakocy: KR Consulting, Warsaw, Poland.
  4. Piotr Samel-Kowalik: Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology).
  5. Bolesław Samoliński: Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology).
  6. Mariusz Gujski: Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland (Department of Public Health).
  7. Jarosław Pinkas: Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland (School of Public Health).
  8. Mateusz Jankowski: Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland (School of Public Health).

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vaccination skepticism and vaccination refusal both constitute global public health concerns. Systematic monitoring of public attitudes towards vaccination is crucial for maintaining a high vaccination coverage rate. The study aimed to identify and characterize homogenous social groups distinguished by attitudes toward preventive vaccinations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October and November of 2021, a nationwide representative cross-sectional survey was conducted on a representative sample of 1560 inhabitants of Poland aged 15-39 years. The study questionnaire included 60 questions on public attitudes towards vaccines, vaccination, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Factor analysis was applied to identify the main dimensions of vaccination attitudes.
RESULTS: Factor analysis included 22 variables and yielded 3 factors or dimensions that accounted for 48.5% of the model's variability. Young adults were assigned into 6 homogeneous groups based on these factors: 1) general trust in vaccination, 2) vaccine safety concerns, 3) trust in fake medical news regarding COVID-19 vaccination, and denying the COVID-19 pandemic. Groups I-IV differed by sociodemographic factors and vaccination coverage rates. Nearly 60% of the respondents expressed concern regarding various aspects of vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of Poland's young adults lack clearly defined attitudes towards vaccination. Attitudes towards vaccination can be divided into 6 heterogeneous groups. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(2):214-28.

Keywords

References

  1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 16;67(45):1261-1264 [PMID: 30439873]
  2. Med Sci Monit. 2022 Apr 01;28:e936808 [PMID: 35363668]
  3. Health Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 18;5(2):e00516 [PMID: 35224217]
  4. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):196 [PMID: 29378545]
  5. Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Mar 10;17(3):2693-2707 [PMID: 32233561]
  6. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4 [PMID: 25896383]
  7. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Oct 25;68(42):937-942 [PMID: 31647786]
  8. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;9(11): [PMID: 34835267]
  9. Pediatr Ann. 2015 Apr;44(4):e71-5 [PMID: 25875982]
  10. Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4165-75 [PMID: 25896384]
  11. Public Health. 2021 Nov;200:4-6 [PMID: 34628307]
  12. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Aug;9(8):1763-73 [PMID: 23584253]
  13. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 13;9(3): [PMID: 33805681]
  14. Vaccine. 2019 Jan 7;37(2):226-234 [PMID: 30527660]
  15. Vaccine. 2005 May 9;23(25):3329-35 [PMID: 15837239]
  16. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 21;17(12): [PMID: 32575879]
  17. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15): [PMID: 32751180]
  18. J Health Commun. 2020 Oct 2;25(10):799-807 [PMID: 33719881]
  19. Vaccine. 2018 Aug 9;36(33):4979-4992 [PMID: 30037416]
  20. Euro Surveill. 2018 Apr;23(17): [PMID: 29717694]
  21. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jul 25;20(1):354 [PMID: 32711498]
  22. Vaccine. 2014 Apr 17;32(19):2150-9 [PMID: 24598724]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 24;17(12): [PMID: 32599943]
  24. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):46-58 [PMID: 32175710]
  25. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):2962-2964 [PMID: 33890838]
  26. Lancet. 2008 Dec 13;372(9655):2031-46 [PMID: 19070738]
  27. Vaccine. 2014 Oct 29;32(47):6259-65 [PMID: 25258098]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 15;15(4): [PMID: 29662022]
  29. Vaccine. 2017 May 19;35(22):2955-2961 [PMID: 28434687]
  30. Vaccine. 2012 Dec 17;31(1):96-108 [PMID: 23142307]
  31. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Mar 15;15:100365 [PMID: 35531498]

MeSH Term

Young Adult
Humans
Cross-Sectional Studies
COVID-19 Vaccines
Pandemics
COVID-19
Vaccination
Attitude

Chemicals

COVID-19 Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationattitudestowardspublicgroupsCOVID-19analysistrustvaccineconcernscoveragestudyidentifypreventivevaccinationsrepresentativecross-sectionalsurveyPolandaged15-39yearsincludedvaccinespandemicFactordimensions3factorsadults62regardingOBJECTIVES:VaccinationskepticismrefusalconstituteglobalhealthSystematicmonitoringcrucialmaintaininghighrateaimedcharacterizehomogenoussocialdistinguishedtowardMATERIALANDMETHODS:OctoberNovember2021nationwideconductedsample1560inhabitantsquestionnaire60questionsappliedmainRESULTS:22variablesyieldedaccounted485%model'svariabilityYoungassignedhomogeneousbasedfactors:1generalsafetyfakemedicalnewsdenyingGroupsI-IVdifferedsociodemographicratesNearly60%respondentsexpressedconcernvariousaspectsCONCLUSIONS:Poland'syounglackclearlydefinedAttitudescandividedheterogeneousIntJOccupMedEnvironHealth202336:214-28multidimensionalnature-amongPolesfactorhesitancy

Similar Articles

Cited By