Electromagnetic fields exposure on fetal and childhood abnormalities: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zahra Atarodi Kashani, Reza Pakzad, Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari, Mohammad Sadegh Haghparast, Fatemeh Abdi, Zohreh Kiani, Afsaneh Talebi, Somaieh Moradi Haghgoo
Author Information
  1. Zahra Atarodi Kashani: Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran. ORCID
  2. Reza Pakzad: Students Research Committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran. ORCID
  3. Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari: Department of Midwifery, School of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
  4. Mohammad Sadegh Haghparast: School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  5. Fatemeh Abdi: Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran. ORCID
  6. Zohreh Kiani: Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Ahvas, Iran.
  7. Afsaneh Talebi: Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
  8. Somaieh Moradi Haghgoo: Students Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Abstract

Today, in the modern world, people are often exposed to electromagnetic waves, which can have undesirable effects on cell components that lead to differentiation and abnormalities in cell proliferation, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, chromosomal abnormalities, cancers, and birth defects. This study aimed to investigate the effect of electromagnetic waves on fetal and childhood abnormalities. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched on 1 January 2023. The Cochran's -test and statistics were applied to assess heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and mean difference for different outcomes, and a meta-regression method was utilized to investigate the factors affecting heterogeneity between studies. A total of 14 studies were included in the analysis, and the outcomes investigated were: change in gene expression, oxidant parameters, antioxidant parameters, and DNA damage parameters in the umbilical cord blood of the fetus and fetal developmental disorders, cancers, and childhood development disorders. Totally, the events of fetal and childhood abnormalities were more common in parents who have been exposed to EMFs compared to those who have not (SMD and 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 [0.15-0.35]; , 91%). Moreover, fetal developmental disorders (OR, 1.34; CI, 1.17-1.52; , 0%); cancer (OR, 1.14; CI, 1.05-1.23; , 60.1%); childhood development disorders (OR, 2.10; CI, 1.00-3.21; , 0%); changes in gene expression (mean difference [MD], 1.02; CI, 0.67-1.37; , 93%); oxidant parameters (MD, 0.94; CI, 0.70-1.18; , 61.3%); and DNA damage parameters (MD, 1.01; CI, 0.17-1.86; , 91.6%) in parents who have been exposed to EMFs were more than those in parents who have not. According to meta-regression, publication year has a significant effect on heterogeneity (coefficient: 0.033; 0.009-0.057). Maternal exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially in the first trimester of pregnancy, due to the high level of stem cells and their high sensitivity to this radiation, the biochemical parameters of the umbilical cord blood examined was shown increased oxidative stress reactions, changes in protein gene expression, DNA damage, and increased embryonic abnormalities. In addition, parental exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation can lead to the enhancement of different cell-based cancers and developmental disorders such as speech problems in childhood.

Keywords

References

  1. Biomed Pharmacother. 2008 Feb;62(2):104-9 [PMID: 18242044]
  2. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2347-50 [PMID: 25824762]
  3. Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544 [PMID: 27733281]
  4. Prog Brain Res. 2007;162:107-35 [PMID: 17645917]
  5. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Sep;15(3):266-70 [PMID: 17854521]
  6. Electromagn Biol Med. 2012 Sep;31(3):213-22 [PMID: 22897402]
  7. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2010 Mar;29(1):59-66 [PMID: 20371881]
  8. Pediatr Rep. 2013 Feb 05;5(1):e5 [PMID: 23667734]
  9. Reprod Sci. 2013 Sep;20(9):1055-61 [PMID: 23420827]
  10. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 May;182(5):1107-9 [PMID: 15100102]
  11. Electromagn Biol Med. 2006;25(4):217-25 [PMID: 17178582]
  12. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019 Feb 01;9(1):61-68 [PMID: 30881935]
  13. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 May;30(10):1249-1253 [PMID: 27442264]
  14. Differentiation. 2002 May;70(2-3):120-9 [PMID: 12076339]
  15. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9(6):e101050 [PMID: 24977708]
  16. J Res Med Sci. 2009 Mar;14(2):111-6 [PMID: 21772869]
  17. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 15;13:860110 [PMID: 35370942]
  18. Life Sci. 2006 Dec 3;80(1):43-50 [PMID: 16978664]
  19. Occup Environ Med. 2002 Feb;59(2):92-7 [PMID: 11850551]
  20. Rom J Intern Med. 2017 Sep 26;55(3):145-150 [PMID: 28422709]
  21. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Aug 01;10(1):363 [PMID: 28764804]
  22. Mutat Res. 2009 Mar 9;662(1-2):54-8 [PMID: 19135463]
  23. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020 May - Jun;40(3):299-310 [PMID: 31813592]
  24. Histol Histopathol. 2011 Jul;26(7):873-81 [PMID: 21630217]
  25. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013 Dec;156(1-3):221-9 [PMID: 24101576]
  26. Electron Physician. 2016 Jul 25;8(7):2655-62 [PMID: 27648194]
  27. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 3;97(11):1583-7 [PMID: 17971773]
  28. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004 May;25(4):296-307 [PMID: 15114639]
  29. Turk J Med Sci. 2015;45(2):291-7 [PMID: 26084117]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;18(22): [PMID: 34831564]
  31. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2006 Aug;24(8):468-70 [PMID: 16978513]
  32. Am J Ind Med. 2001 May;39(5):499-504 [PMID: 11333411]
  33. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Nov 15;138(10):775-86 [PMID: 8237966]
  34. Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1949-1957 [PMID: 31280302]
  35. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Oct;17(5):324-9 [PMID: 1947918]
  36. Lupus. 2018 May;27(6):899-912 [PMID: 29301471]
  37. Endocrine. 2016 May;52(2):352-62 [PMID: 26578367]
  38. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015 Sep;36(6):480-4 [PMID: 26179386]
  39. Epidemiology. 2003 Jul;14(4):437-41 [PMID: 12843769]
  40. Arch Dis Child. 2018 Mar;103(3):215-217 [PMID: 29066522]
  41. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 1;171(1):27-35 [PMID: 19942577]
  42. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1375-84 [PMID: 20804846]
  43. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Apr;156(4):315-20 [PMID: 11929362]
  44. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 1;166(3):270-9 [PMID: 17556764]
  45. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2012 Mar;39(1):1-9 [PMID: 22563544]
  46. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Aug 6;320(4):1253-61 [PMID: 15249225]
  47. Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1318-1325 [PMID: 18804757]
  48. Arch Dis Child. 2015 Mar;100(3):233-8 [PMID: 25260520]
  49. Eye (Lond). 2020 Aug;34(8):1357-1370 [PMID: 32055021]
  50. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 04;58(9): [PMID: 36143894]
  51. CMAJ. 2008 Dec 2;179(12):1293-6 [PMID: 19047611]
  52. Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1199-210 [PMID: 25878217]
  53. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Oct;210(5):635-44 [PMID: 17765660]
  54. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 May;112(6):687-94 [PMID: 15121512]
  55. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Mar 21;51(6):1463-77 [PMID: 16510956]
  56. Teratology. 1991 Feb;43(2):109-12 [PMID: 2014476]
  57. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 03;8(7):e67284 [PMID: 23843999]
  58. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1271-6 [PMID: 19293315]
  59. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Dec;290(6):1109-14 [PMID: 25027820]
  60. Electromagn Biol Med. 2018;37(4):184-191 [PMID: 30156944]
  61. Int J Androl. 2005 Jun;28(3):171-9 [PMID: 15910543]
  62. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013 Nov;67(2):743-51 [PMID: 23526187]
  63. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2010;56(1):39-47 [PMID: 19851891]
  64. Strabismus. 2019 Jun;27(2):54-65 [PMID: 31012389]
  65. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015 Jan;22(1):75-84 [PMID: 25561888]
  66. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Feb;11(2):177-85 [PMID: 11867505]
  67. Arch Iran Med. 2013 Apr;16(4):221-4 [PMID: 23496365]
  68. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Sep 1;82(5):488-93 [PMID: 20822083]
  69. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):2583-2587 [PMID: 35959847]
  70. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005;Suppl 7:S107-15 [PMID: 16037961]
  71. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Aug;20(6):945-55 [PMID: 19224378]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01childhood0abnormalitiesfetalparametersCIdisorderselectromagneticDNAdamageORexposedcancersheterogeneitymeandifferencegeneexpressiondevelopmentalparentsexposurefieldswavescancellleadinvestigateeffectSMDdifferentoutcomesmeta-regressionstudies14oxidantumbilicalcordblooddevelopmentEMFs17-10%changesMDhighradiationincreasedTodaymodernworldpeopleoftenundesirableeffectscomponentsdifferentiationproliferationdeoxyribonucleicacidchromosomalbirthdefectsstudyaimedPubMedScopusWebScienceProQuestCochraneLibraryGoogleScholarsearchedJanuary2023Cochran's-teststatisticsappliedassessrandom-effectsmodelusedestimatepooledoddsratiostandardizedmethodutilizedfactorsaffectingtotalincludedanalysisinvestigatedwere:changeantioxidantfetusTotallyeventscommoncompared95%confidenceinterval[CI]25[015-035]91%Moreover3452cancer05-123601%21000-321[MD]0267-13793%9470-118613%0186916%Accordingpublicationyearsignificantcoefficient:033009-0057Maternalespeciallyfirsttrimesterpregnancyduelevelstemcellssensitivitybiochemicalexaminedshownoxidativestressreactionsproteinembryonicadditionparentalionizingnon-ionizingenhancementcell-basedspeechproblemsElectromagneticabnormalities:Systematicreviewmeta-analysisdiseases

Similar Articles

Cited By