Professional Expectations of Provider LGBTQ Competence: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go.

Natasha D Williams, Brennan Winer, Elizabeth M Aparicio, Mia A Smith-Bynum, Bradley O Boekeloo, Jessica N Fish
Author Information
  1. Natasha D Williams: Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
  2. Brennan Winer: Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
  3. Elizabeth M Aparicio: University of Maryland Prevention Research Center.
  4. Mia A Smith-Bynum: Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
  5. Bradley O Boekeloo: University of Maryland Prevention Research Center.
  6. Jessica N Fish: Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.

Abstract

Introduction: Mental and behavioral health professional organizations use their governing documents to set expectations of provider competence in working with LGBTQ+ clients.
Method: The codes of ethics and training program accreditation guidelines of nine mental and behavioral health disciplines (n=16) were analyzed using template analysis.
Results: Coding resulted in fives themes: mission and values, direct practice, clinician education, culturally competent professional development, and advocacy. Expectations for provider competency vary greatly across disciplines.
Conclusion: Having a mental and behavioral health workforce that is uniformly competent in meeting the unique needs of LGBTQ populations is key for supporting the mental and behavioral health of LGBTQ persons.

Keywords

References

  1. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Dec;13(6):402-410 [PMID: 27779817]
  2. Am J Public Health. 2013 May;103(5):943-51 [PMID: 23488522]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jul;208:126-133 [PMID: 29803970]
  4. J Marital Fam Ther. 2015 Jan;41(1):42-56 [PMID: 24750074]
  5. Am Psychol. 2001 Nov;56(11):931-47 [PMID: 11785169]
  6. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002 Aug;94(8):666-8 [PMID: 12152921]
  7. Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222 [PMID: 27499705]
  8. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(5):367-85 [PMID: 26552495]
  9. Am Psychol. 2012 Jan;67(1):10-42 [PMID: 21875169]
  10. Am Psychol. 1991 Sep;46(9):964-72 [PMID: 1958015]
  11. Cogn Behav Pract. 2005;12(3):278-289 [PMID: 17075610]
  12. Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):674-697 [PMID: 12956539]
  13. J Homosex. 2007;53(4):201-21 [PMID: 18689198]
  14. J Subst Abuse. 2000;12(4):311-28 [PMID: 11452836]
  15. J Marital Fam Ther. 2010 Apr;36(2):171-84 [PMID: 20433594]
  16. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2000 Oct;19(3):291-6 [PMID: 11027900]
  17. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):875-89 [PMID: 26147563]
  18. Am Psychol. 2013 Jul-Aug;68(5):337-58 [PMID: 23895600]
  19. J Clin Psychol. 2001 May;57(5):629-43 [PMID: 11304703]
  20. Am J Public Health. 2010 Mar;100(3):468-75 [PMID: 19696380]
  21. Subst Use Misuse. 2004 Mar;39(4):625-44 [PMID: 15115216]
  22. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Sep;57(3):293-301 [PMID: 31427032]
  23. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 03;14:99 [PMID: 24589335]
  24. J Pediatr Health Care. 1997 Nov-Dec;11(6):266-74 [PMID: 9423411]
  25. Psychother Res. 2008 May;18(3):294-305 [PMID: 18815981]
  26. Am J Public Health. 2001 Jun;91(6):990-1 [PMID: 11392949]
  27. Nurs Outlook. 1997 May-Jun;45(3):125-32 [PMID: 9210160]
  28. Addiction. 2009 Aug;104(8):1333-45 [PMID: 19438839]
  29. Subst Use Misuse. 2010 Jun;45(7-8):1077-96 [PMID: 20441452]
  30. Am Psychol. 2015 Dec;70(9):832-64 [PMID: 26653312]
  31. Alcohol Treat Q. 2011;29(4):403-435 [PMID: 22470226]
  32. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2015 Sep;52(3):287-97 [PMID: 26301421]
  33. Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):932-943 [PMID: 32970327]
  34. AMA J Ethics. 2016 Nov 1;18(11):1147-1155 [PMID: 27883307]
  35. Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1113-1114 [PMID: 32639919]

Grants

  1. P2C HD041041/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. U48 DP006382/NCCDPHP CDC HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthmentalbehavioralLGBTQproviderprofessionaltrainingdisciplinescompetentExpectationscompetencyIntroduction:MentalorganizationsusegoverningdocumentssetexpectationscompetenceworkingLGBTQ+clientsMethod:codesethicsprogramaccreditationguidelinesninen=16analyzedusingtemplateanalysisResults:Codingresultedfivesthemes:missionvaluesdirectpracticeclinicianeducationculturallydevelopmentadvocacyvarygreatlyacrossConclusion:workforceuniformlymeetinguniqueneedspopulationskeysupportingpersonsProfessionalProviderCompetence:NeedGoculturalcarepolicyservices

Similar Articles

Cited By