Barriers in Ophthalmology Residency Applications for Students Identifying as Underrepresented in Medicine: A San Francisco Match Analysis.

Johsias A Maru, Jiangxia Wang, O'Rese J Knight, Brittany C Tsou, Julius T Oatts, David A Ross, Edward Z Moore, Alice Yang Zhang, Saras Ramanathan, Fasika A Woreta
Author Information
  1. Johsias A Maru: School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  2. Jiangxia Wang: Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  3. O'Rese J Knight: Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  4. Brittany C Tsou: Department of Ophthalmology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
  5. Julius T Oatts: Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  6. David A Ross: Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
  7. Edward Z Moore: Department of Engineering, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, Connecticut.
  8. Alice Yang Zhang: Department of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  9. Saras Ramanathan: Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  10. Fasika A Woreta: Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: fworeta1@jhmi.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a significant lack of ophthalmologists who self-identify as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) in the physician workforce. Prior literature has revealed bias in traditional metrics for selection relied on by resident programs such as United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, letters of recommendation (LOR), and induction into medical honors societies such as Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA). The purpose of this study was to elucidate race-based differences in word usage within ophthalmology residency letters of recommendation that may disproportionately affect URiM applicants.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective, cohort study.
SETTING: This was a multicenter study across the Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins, the University of California San Francisco, and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
PARTICIPANTS: San Francisco (SF) Match applications submitted to three ophthalmology residency programs between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. URiM status, USMLE Step 1 score, and AOA membership were recorded. Letters of recommendation were analyzed using text analysis software. T-tests and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Frequency of word/summary term usage in letters of recommendation were the main outcome measures.
RESULTS: Relative to non-URiM applicants, URiM applicants had lower USMLE Step 1 scores (mean difference=7.0; p<0.001). Non-URiM letters of recommendation were more likely to describe applicants as "dependable" (p=0.009) and highlight "research" (p=0.046). URiM letters were more likely to describe applicants as "warm" (p=0.02) and "caring" (p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential barriers for URiM ophthalmology residency applicants which can help guide future interventions to increase workforce diversity.

Keywords

References

  1. Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct;15(10):1331-9 [PMID: 18790406]
  2. Med Educ. 2020 Jul;54(7):637-642 [PMID: 32119145]
  3. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229062 [PMID: 36069984]
  4. Urology. 2019 Dec;134:56-61 [PMID: 31491451]
  5. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):348-58 [PMID: 23664105]
  6. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021 Dec 31;13(2):e298-e303 [PMID: 37388829]
  7. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):476 [PMID: 31888607]
  8. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Feb;5(1):117-140 [PMID: 28275996]
  9. Health Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 20;3(2):e2161 [PMID: 32318628]
  10. JB JS Open Access. 2020 Jun 26;5(3): [PMID: 32803104]
  11. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 May-Jun;24(3):284-287 [PMID: 30996695]
  12. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 16;334(20):1305-10 [PMID: 8609949]
  13. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 1;134(9):1016-23 [PMID: 27416525]
  14. MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Sep 2;17:11183 [PMID: 34557589]
  15. Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):1041-7 [PMID: 20110128]
  16. Ophthalmology. 2020 Jul;127(7):848-851 [PMID: 32564810]
  17. J Surg Educ. 2021 Sep-Oct;78(5):1500-1515 [PMID: 33879396]
  18. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):90-102 [PMID: 12224912]
  19. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar-Apr;53(2):164-76 [PMID: 18348881]
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):190 [PMID: 31174525]
  21. Acad Med. 2019 Mar;94(3):364-370 [PMID: 30024473]
  22. J Health Soc Behav. 2002 Sep;43(3):296-306 [PMID: 12467254]
  23. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;154(6 Suppl):S53-62.e1 [PMID: 23158224]
  24. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 06;10(5):e4301 [PMID: 35539293]
  25. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Apr;228(4):356-365.e3 [PMID: 30630084]
  26. Urology. 2022 Jun;164:5-10 [PMID: 35063461]
  27. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):659-665 [PMID: 28264091]
  28. JAMA. 1995 May 17;273(19):1515-20 [PMID: 7739078]
  29. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0207274 [PMID: 30444928]
  30. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 May;34(5):684-691 [PMID: 30993609]
  31. Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec;127(12):2738-2745 [PMID: 28786169]
  32. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0181659 [PMID: 28792940]
  33. Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):865-70 [PMID: 23260256]

Grants

  1. P30 EY001765/NEI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
United States
Internship and Residency
Retrospective Studies
Cohort Studies
San Francisco
Ophthalmology
Students

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0URiMlettersrecommendationapplicantsstudyp=0USMLEophthalmologyresidencySanFranciscounderrepresentedmedicineworkforcebiasprogramsscoresLORAlphaAOAusageUniversityMatchStep1likelydescribe02barriersOBJECTIVE:significantlackophthalmologistsself-identifyphysicianPriorliteraturerevealedtraditionalmetricsselectionreliedresidentUnitedStatesMedicalLicensingExaminationinductionmedicalhonorssocietiesOmegapurposeelucidaterace-baseddifferenceswordwithinmaydisproportionatelyaffectDESIGN:retrospectivecohortSETTING:multicenteracrossWilmerEyeInstituteJohnsHopkinsCaliforniaNorthCarolinaChapelHillPARTICIPANTS:SFapplicationssubmittedthree20182020reviewedstatusscoremembershiprecordedLettersanalyzedusingtextanalysissoftwareT-testschi-squaredFisher'sexacttestsusedcomparecontinuouscategoricalvariablesrespectivelyFrequencyword/summarytermmainoutcomemeasuresRESULTS:Relativenon-URiMlowermeandifference=70p<0001Non-URiM"dependable"009highlight"research"046"warm""caring"CONCLUSIONS:identifiedpotentialcanhelpguidefutureinterventionsincreasediversityBarriersOphthalmologyResidencyApplicationsStudentsIdentifyingUnderrepresentedMedicine:Analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)