Knowledge, attitude, and perceived practice of sanitary workers on healthcare waste management: A descriptive cross-sectional study in Dodoma region,Tanzania.

Walter C Millanzi, Patricia Z Herman, Samweli A Mtangi
Author Information
  1. Walter C Millanzi: Department of Nursing Management and Education, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania. ORCID
  2. Patricia Z Herman: Department of Nursing Management and Education, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania.
  3. Samweli A Mtangi: Department of Nursing Management and Education, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania.

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare facilities produce a variety of trash that, if handled improperly, could endanger the environment, the health of patients and clients, healthcare personnel, and the general public. Health staff have been given training on infection control and healthcare waste management. It is not apparent whether similar initiatives are taken for sanitary personnel, though. By evaluating sanitary workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices about healthcare waste treatment in the Dodoma region of Tanzania, this study sought to clarify the situation.
Methods: From March to August 2022 in Dodoma, Tanzania, a descriptive cross-sectional study using a quantitative methodology was conducted on 156 randomly chosen sanitary workers. The primary data collection instruments were structured questionnaires that were conducted by interviewers and a trash checklist that the research team created. Statistical Package for Social Sciences computer software was used to conduct a descriptive analysis of the data with a 95% confidence level and a 5% level of significance.
Results: The average age was 28 ± 6.2 years, and there were 74.4% females. Of all of the health institutions under study, 78.4% of the generated medical waste was non-infectious, whereas 21.6% of it was infectious. The share of non-infectious and infectious healthcare waste created by regional referral hospitals was 43.5% and 13.2%, respectively. While 67.8% of sanitary workers believed that handling healthcare waste was not their problem and 63.6% of sanitary workers actually displayed subpar practices of handling healthcare waste, 74.4% of sanitary workers had low understanding about handling healthcare waste. Their procedures for handling medical waste were substantially influenced by the kind of healthcare facility, sex, education, job experience, knowledge, and attitude ( < 0.05).
Conclusion: Sanitary staff members had limited understanding and thought they were less concerned with gathering, moving, and storing medical waste. To provide the highest level of health safety, national health policy and facility-based interventions must support and fund participatory waste management training that is tailored to the sociodemographic profiles of sanitary employees.

Keywords

References

  1. J Environ Public Health. 2021 Jan 30;2021:6614565 [PMID: 33564314]
  2. J Hazard Mater. 2022 Jan 15;422:126724 [PMID: 34399217]
  3. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):128 [PMID: 31660933]
  4. J Lab Physicians. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):292-299 [PMID: 31929693]
  5. Indian J Public Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;65(4):345-351 [PMID: 34975076]
  6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):642 [PMID: 34217281]
  7. J Control Release. 2022 Mar;343:703-723 [PMID: 35149141]
  8. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0243817 [PMID: 33406119]
  9. J Environ Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;2018:7672981 [PMID: 30386382]
  10. Environ Health Insights. 2022 Jan 17;16:11786302211073383 [PMID: 35095276]
  11. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):e056037 [PMID: 35301210]
  12. Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55 [PMID: 28029643]
  13. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;21(1):1340 [PMID: 34233645]
  14. Waste Manag Res. 2019 Sep;37(9):863-875 [PMID: 31266407]
  15. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):591 [PMID: 31438959]
  16. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2023;16:386-402 [PMID: 34905495]
  17. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:981756 [PMID: 26779565]
  18. Egypt J Intern Med. 2021;33(1):37 [PMID: 34803371]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;18(22): [PMID: 34831585]
  20. Waste Manag Res. 2021 Sep;39(9):1149-1163 [PMID: 34218734]
  21. PeerJ. 2022 Jul 20;10:e13773 [PMID: 35880221]
  22. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0266037 [PMID: 35385508]
  23. Environ Res. 2022 Dec;215(Pt 2):114240 [PMID: 36103930]
  24. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;9(6): [PMID: 34207056]
  25. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 10;811:152295 [PMID: 34896490]
  26. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;2(6):e0000655 [PMID: 36962386]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):1075 [PMID: 32641022]
  28. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Mar 05;9(3): [PMID: 33807606]
  29. BMC Res Notes. 2019 Mar 15;12(1):146 [PMID: 30876467]
  30. J Environ Public Health. 2020 Sep 28;2020:8745472 [PMID: 33061997]
  31. Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 20;8:14 [PMID: 32154200]
  32. BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):203 [PMID: 30777034]
  33. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222 [PMID: 33069326]
  34. J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Dec 31;8:266 [PMID: 32002438]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wastehealthcaresanitaryworkershealthhandlingDodomastudyTanzaniadescriptivelevel4%medicalinfectioustrashpersonnelpublicstafftrainingmanagementknowledgepracticesregioncross-sectionalconducteddatacreated5%74non-infectious6%understandingattitudeIntroduction:HealthcarefacilitiesproducevarietyhandledimproperlyendangerenvironmentpatientsclientsgeneralHealthgiveninfectioncontrolapparentwhethersimilarinitiativestakenthoughevaluatingworkers'attitudestreatmentsoughtclarifysituationMethods:MarchAugust2022usingquantitativemethodology156randomlychosenprimarycollectioninstrumentsstructuredquestionnairesinterviewerschecklistresearchteamStatisticalPackageSocialSciencescomputersoftwareusedconductanalysis95%confidencesignificanceResults:averageage28 ± 62 yearsfemalesinstitutions78generatedwhereas21shareregionalreferralhospitals43132%respectively678%believedproblem63actuallydisplayedsubparlowproceduressubstantiallyinfluencedkindfacilitysexeducationjobexperience< 005Conclusion:Sanitarymemberslimitedthoughtlessconcernedgatheringmovingstoringprovidehighestsafetynationalpolicyfacility-basedinterventionsmustsupportfundparticipatorytailoredsociodemographicprofilesemployeesKnowledgeperceivedpracticemanagement:EpidemiologyUniversitydiseases

Similar Articles

Cited By