Effects of phenylcapsaicin on aerobic capacity and physiological parameters in active young males: a randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

Pablo Jiménez-Martínez, Carlos Alix-Fages, Danica Janicijevic, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Sara Chacón-Ventura, Juan J Martín-Olmedo, Juan Carlos De La Cruz-Márquez, Francisco J Osuna-Prieto, Lucas Jurado-Fasoli, Francisco J Amaro-Gahete, Amador García-Ramos, Juan C Colado
Author Information
  1. Pablo Jiménez-Martínez: Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport (PHES), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  2. Carlos Alix-Fages: Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport (PHES), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
  3. Danica Janicijevic: Research Academy of Human Biomechanics, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
  4. Sergio Miras-Moreno: Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  5. Sara Chacón-Ventura: Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  6. Juan J Martín-Olmedo: Life Pro Nutrition Research Center, INDIEX, Madrid, Spain.
  7. Juan Carlos De La Cruz-Márquez: Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  8. Francisco J Osuna-Prieto: Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  9. Lucas Jurado-Fasoli: Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  10. Francisco J Amaro-Gahete: Department of Physical and Sports Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  11. Amador García-Ramos: Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  12. Juan C Colado: Research Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport (PHES), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Abstract

Phenylcapsaicin (PC) is a new capsaicin analog which has exhibited a higher bioavailability. This sudy assessed the effects of a low dose (LD) of 0.625 mg and a high dose (HD) of 2.5 mg of PC on aerobic capacity, substrate oxidation, energy metabolism and exercise physiological variables in young males. Seventeen active males (age = 24.7 ± 6.0 years) enrolled to this randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Participants attended the laboratory on 4 sessions separated by 72-96 h. A submaximal exercise test [to determine maximal fat oxidation (MFO) and the intensity at MFO (FATmax)] followed by a maximal incremental test (to determine VO2) were performed in a preliminary session. The subsequent sessions only differed in the supplement ingested [LD, HD or placebo (PLA)] and consisted of a steady-state test (60 min at FATmax) followed by a maximal incremental test. Energy metabolism, substrate oxidation, heart rate, general (gRPE) and quadriceps (RPEquad) rate of perceived exertion, skin temperature and thermal perception were tested. Clavicle thermal perception was lower in HD compared to PLA and LD ( = 0.04) across time. HD reduced maximum heart rate in comparison to PLA and LD ( = 0.03). LD reported higher general RPE (RPEg) values during the steady-state test compared to PLA and HD across time ( = 0.02). HD and LD elicited higher peak of fat oxidation during the steady-state test compared with PLA ( = 0.05). Intra-test analyses revealed significant differences for fat oxidation (FATox) in favor of HD and LD compared to PLA ( 0.002 and 0.002, respectively), and for carbohydrate oxidation (CHOox) ( 0.05) and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ( 0.03) for PLA. In the incremental test, only general RPE at 60% of the maximal intensity (W) differed favoring HD ( ≤ 0.05). Therefore, PC may contribute to increase aerobic capacity through the improvement of fat oxidation, maximum heart rate and perceptual responses during exercise.

Keywords

References

  1. Nutrients. 2022 Oct 28;14(21): [PMID: 36364793]
  2. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2022 Jul 19;19(1):417-436 [PMID: 35875695]
  3. EFSA J. 2019 Jun 14;17(6):e05718 [PMID: 32626340]
  4. Int J Toxicol. 2008;27 Suppl 3:59-72 [PMID: 19037799]
  5. Motor Control. 2023 Apr 6;:1-14 [PMID: 37024109]
  6. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 06;14(2): [PMID: 35057413]
  7. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011 Jan 10;650(1):1-7 [PMID: 20946891]
  8. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 May 1;122(5):1068-1076 [PMID: 27932676]
  9. Molecules. 2016 Jul 23;21(8): [PMID: 27455231]
  10. Physiol Meas. 2010 Jan;31(1):95-114 [PMID: 19940348]
  11. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 May;122(5):1111-1128 [PMID: 35138447]
  12. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jul;29(7):910-921 [PMID: 30929281]
  13. Phytother Res. 2021 Nov;35(11):6080-6088 [PMID: 34676607]
  14. Br J Nutr. 2003 Sep;90(3):651-59 [PMID: 13129472]
  15. Plant J. 2009 Sep;59(6):953-61 [PMID: 19473323]
  16. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Apr;119(4):971-979 [PMID: 30737555]
  17. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Mar;32(3):716-725 [PMID: 27749728]
  18. Nutrients. 2020 Dec 04;12(12): [PMID: 33291700]
  19. Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10530 [PMID: 28874709]
  20. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Jan 12;16(4):464-473 [PMID: 33383571]
  21. J Am Nutr Assoc. 2022 Aug;41(6):541-550 [PMID: 34252340]
  22. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov;48(11):2294-2306 [PMID: 27003703]
  23. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018 Nov;43(11):1166-1175 [PMID: 29701482]
  24. Nutr Rev. 2018 Apr 1;76(4):243-259 [PMID: 29444266]
  25. Physiol Rep. 2019 Dec;7(24):e14325 [PMID: 31883232]
  26. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;43(10):750-5 [PMID: 18390917]
  27. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Mar;29(3):355-61 [PMID: 9139174]
  28. Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct;37(5):1618-1624 [PMID: 28826698]
  29. Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Feb;24(2):109-120 [PMID: 30630668]
  30. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Aug;55(2):628-34 [PMID: 6618956]
  31. J Physiol. 1949 Aug;109(1-2):1-9 [PMID: 15394301]
  32. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Feb;32(2):572-577 [PMID: 29120986]
  33. Motor Control. 2022 Dec 12;27(2):442-461 [PMID: 36509089]
  34. Temperature (Austin). 2015 Jun 02;2(2):277-96 [PMID: 27227029]
  35. Sports Med. 2007;37(12):1019-28 [PMID: 18027991]
  36. Temperature (Austin). 2019 Sep 19;7(2):178-190 [PMID: 33015245]
  37. Sports Med. 2022 Nov;52(11):2775-2795 [PMID: 35829994]
  38. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2023 Dec;20(1):2204083 [PMID: 37086038]
  39. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74(2):274-8 [PMID: 20139632]
  40. Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4-5):489-97 [PMID: 16797616]
  41. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Aug 03;7:65 [PMID: 20682072]
  42. Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 09;6:36740 [PMID: 27827430]
  43. Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 18;9:1460 [PMID: 30405428]
  44. J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Aug;32(8):2227-2232 [PMID: 28682933]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00HDoxidationtestPLALDexercise=capacitymaximalfatratecomparedPChigheraerobicsubstratemetabolismincrementalsteady-stateheartgeneral05dosephysiologicalyoungmalesactiverandomizedtriple-blindedplacebo-controlledcrossovertrialsessionsdetermineMFOintensityFATmax]followeddifferedthermalperceptionacrosstimemaximum03RPE002phenylcapsaicinPhenylcapsaicinnewcapsaicinanalogexhibitedbioavailabilitysudyassessedeffectslow625 mghigh25 mgenergyvariablesSeventeenage247±60 yearsenrolledParticipantsattendedlaboratory4separated72-96 hsubmaximal[toVO2performedpreliminarysessionsubsequentsupplementingested[LDplaceboconsisted60 minEnergygRPEquadricepsRPEquadperceivedexertionskintemperaturetestedClaviclelower04reducedcomparisonreportedRPEgvalues02elicitedpeakIntra-testanalysesrevealedsignificantdifferencesFAToxfavorrespectivelycarbohydrateCHOoxrespiratoryexchangeratioRER60%WfavoringThereforemaycontributeincreaseimprovementperceptualresponsesEffectsparametersmales:ergogenicaid

Similar Articles

Cited By