Engaging the Private Health Service Delivery Sector for TB Care in India-Miles to Go!

Rakesh P Suseela, Mohd Shannawaz
Author Information
  1. Rakesh P Suseela: Amity Institute of Public Health, Amity University, Noida 201303, India.
  2. Mohd Shannawaz: Amity Institute of Public Health, Amity University, Noida 201303, India.

Abstract

More than half of the people with TB in India seek care from the private sector, where suboptimal quality of care is a concern. Significant progress has been made over the last five years to expand the coverage and to involve more private sector providers in TB care under the National TB Elimination Program (NTEP) in India. The objective of this review is to describe the major efforts and the progress made with regard to the engagement of the 'for-profit' private health service delivery sector for TB care in India, to critically discuss this, and to suggest the way forward. We described the recent efforts by the NTEP for private sector engagement based on the literature, including strategy documents, guidelines, annual reports, evaluation studies, and critically looked at the strategies against the vision of partnership. The NTEP has taken a variety of approaches, including education, regulation, provision of cost-free TB services, incentives, and partnership schemes to engage the private sector. As a result of all these interventions, private sector contribution has increased substantially, including TB notification, follow-up, and treatment success. However, these still fall short of achieving the set targets. Strategies were focused more towards the purchase of services rather than creating sustainable partnerships. There are no major strategies to engage the diverse set of providers, including informal health care providers and chemists, who are the first point of contact for a significant number of people with TB. India needs an integrated private sector engagement policy focusing on ensuring standards of TB care for every citizen. The NTEP should adopt an approach specifically tailored to the various categories of providers. For meaningful inclusion of the private sector, it is also essential to build understanding and generate data intelligence for better decision making, strengthen the platforms for engagement, and expand the social insurance coverage.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1250-1284 [PMID: 32861314]
  2. Int Health. 2022 Jul 30;: [PMID: 35907263]
  3. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 29;7(1):41-53 [PMID: 30926737]
  4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 2;22(1):2 [PMID: 34974843]
  5. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0152287 [PMID: 27018589]
  6. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2020 Jun 13;20:100171 [PMID: 32642560]
  7. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Apr;20(4):544-51 [PMID: 26970166]
  8. Health Policy Plan. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 1:i20-9 [PMID: 25012795]
  9. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 5;14(6):e0214928 [PMID: 31166942]
  10. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;16(11):1255-1260 [PMID: 27568356]
  11. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):846-854 [PMID: 34933980]
  12. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(4):241-248 [PMID: 29110864]
  13. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4): [PMID: 35440442]
  14. Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Jul;25(7):803-812 [PMID: 32306481]
  15. Front Public Health. 2019 Sep 02;7:239 [PMID: 31544099]
  16. Health Policy Plan. 2022 Oct 12;37(9):1158-1166 [PMID: 35920775]
  17. PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0196067 [PMID: 29791449]
  18. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Jul 1;9(2):286-295 [PMID: 34038380]
  19. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42458 [PMID: 22879990]
  20. PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 25;15(9):e1002653 [PMID: 30252849]
  21. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 May 1;26(5):457-459 [PMID: 35505482]
  22. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;15(11):1305-13 [PMID: 26268690]
  23. Tuberc Res Treat. 2021 Jun 22;2021:9579167 [PMID: 34239728]
  24. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Jul;19(7):751-63 [PMID: 26056098]
  25. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jan;8(1):160-165 [PMID: 30911499]
  26. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 19;19(1):539 [PMID: 31217003]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TBsectorprivatecareengagementIndiaprovidersNTEPincludingpartnershippeopleprogressmadeexpandcoveragemajoreffortshealthcriticallystrategiesservicesengagesetstandardspublic–privatehalfseeksuboptimalqualityconcernSignificantlastfiveyearsinvolveNationalEliminationProgramobjectivereviewdescriberegard'for-profit'servicedeliverydiscusssuggestwayforwarddescribedrecentbasedliteraturestrategydocumentsguidelinesannualreportsevaluationstudieslookedvisiontakenvarietyapproacheseducationregulationprovisioncost-freeincentivesschemesresultinterventionscontributionincreasedsubstantiallynotificationfollow-uptreatmentsuccessHoweverstillfallshortachievingtargetsStrategiesfocusedtowardspurchaserathercreatingsustainablepartnershipsdiverseinformalchemistsfirstpointcontactsignificantnumberneedsintegratedpolicyfocusingensuringeverycitizenadoptapproachspecificallytailoredvariouscategoriesmeaningfulinclusionalsoessentialbuildunderstandinggeneratedataintelligencebetterdecisionmakingstrengthenplatformssocialinsuranceEngagingPrivateHealthServiceDeliverySectorCareIndia-MilesGo!privatemix

Similar Articles

Cited By