Understanding the Family Context: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Parent and NICU Clinician Experiences and Perspectives.

Maya Dahan, Leahora Rotteau, Shelley Higazi, Ophelia Kwayke, Giselle Lai, Wendy Moulsdale, Lisa Sampson, Jennifer Stannard, Paige Terrien Church, Karel O'Brien
Author Information
  1. Maya Dahan: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada.
  2. Leahora Rotteau: Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada.
  3. Shelley Higazi: DAN Women & Babies Program, Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
  4. Ophelia Kwayke: DAN Women & Babies Program, Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
  5. Giselle Lai: DAN Women & Babies Program, Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
  6. Wendy Moulsdale: DAN Women & Babies Program, Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada. ORCID
  7. Lisa Sampson: DAN Women & Babies Program, Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
  8. Jennifer Stannard: DAN Women & Babies Program, Department of Newborn and Developmental Pediatrics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
  9. Paige Terrien Church: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada.
  10. Karel O'Brien: Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada.

Abstract

Enabling individualized decision-making for patients requires an understanding of the family context (FC) by healthcare providers. The FC is everything that makes the family unique, from their names, preferred pronouns, family structure, cultural or religious beliefs, and family values. While there is an array of approaches for individual clinicians to incorporate the FC into practice, there is a paucity of literature guiding the process of collecting and integrating the FC into clinical care by multidisciplinary interprofessional teams. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore the experience of families and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) clinicians with information sharing around the FC. Our findings illustrate that there are parallel and overlapping experiences of sharing the FC for families and clinicians. Both groups describe the positive impact of sharing the FC on building and sustaining relationships and on personalization of care and personhood. The experience by families of revolving clinicians and the risks of miscommunication about the FC were noted as challenges to sharing the FC. Parents described the desire to control the narrative about their FC, while clinicians described seeking equal access to the FC to support the family in the best way possible related to their clinical role. Our study highlights how the quality of care is positively impacted by clinicians' appreciation of the FC and the complex relationship between a large multidisciplinary interprofessional team and the family in an intensive care unit, while also highlighting the difficulties in its practical application. Knowledge learned can be utilized to inform the development of processes to improve communication between families and clinicians.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2010 Sep 15;304(11):1191-7 [PMID: 20841532]
  2. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):17-24 [PMID: 28917833]
  3. AMA J Ethics. 2021 Feb 1;23(2):E91-96 [PMID: 33635188]
  4. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Jun;32(2):149-165 [PMID: 32402313]
  5. Neonatal Netw. 2005 May-Jun;24(3):25-33 [PMID: 15960009]
  6. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112-21 [PMID: 10180362]
  7. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2179-2185 [PMID: 30029812]
  8. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Dec;72(12):2954-2965 [PMID: 27221824]
  9. Can Fam Physician. 2018 Mar;64(3):176-180 [PMID: 29540381]
  10. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Dec 1;172(12):1115-1116 [PMID: 30357382]
  11. Pediatrics. 2020 Mar;145(3): [PMID: 32054820]
  12. Qual Health Res. 2020 Oct;30(12):1861-1875 [PMID: 32713256]
  13. Clin Perinatol. 2017 Jun;44(2):429-445 [PMID: 28477670]
  14. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Jan;33(1):34-47 [PMID: 17283940]
  15. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8 [PMID: 7455683]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9 [PMID: 19144931]
  17. Am J Bioeth. 2017 Aug;17(8):27-29 [PMID: 28768125]
  18. PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000140 [PMID: 19707579]
  19. Perm J. 2009 Winter;13(1):80-6 [PMID: 21373252]
  20. BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714 [PMID: 25670179]
  21. Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(Suppl 2):54 [PMID: 31572947]
  22. JAMA. 1992 Apr 22-29;267(16):2221-6 [PMID: 1556799]
  23. J Perinatol. 2020 Mar;40(3):504-509 [PMID: 31570796]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 26;350(9):862-4 [PMID: 14985483]
  25. Neoreviews. 2020 Apr;21(4):e217-e225 [PMID: 32238484]
  26. Am J Bioeth. 2017 Nov;17(11):31-39 [PMID: 29111936]
  27. J Perinatol. 2022 Nov;42(11):1496-1503 [PMID: 35705639]
  28. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Jul;6(7):449-450 [PMID: 35623382]
  29. PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000134 [PMID: 19707575]
  30. J Pediatr. 2018 May;196:8-10 [PMID: 29548685]
  31. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Mar;105(3):594-598 [PMID: 34158194]
  32. BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e001107 [PMID: 30775019]
  33. JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1897-902 [PMID: 11597295]
  34. Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608 [PMID: 27670770]
  35. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):845 [PMID: 34416902]
  36. Can J Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Fall;26(3):16-24 [PMID: 26562970]
  37. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):159-63 [PMID: 26202131]
  38. Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Sep;22(6):334-341 [PMID: 29485138]
  39. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;26(1):101198 [PMID: 33558160]
  40. BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e022202 [PMID: 30139905]
  41. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1050-1054 [PMID: 31502393]
  42. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 8;379(19):1851-1860 [PMID: 30403936]

Grants

  1. n/a/CHILD-Bright Network - Graduate Fellowship in Patient Oriented Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FCfamilyclinicianscarefamiliessharingcontextclinicalmultidisciplinaryinterprofessionalstudyexperienceNICUdescribedcommunicationEnablingindividualizeddecision-makingpatientsrequiresunderstandinghealthcareproviderseverythingmakesuniquenamespreferredpronounsstructureculturalreligiousbeliefsvaluesarrayapproachesindividualincorporatepracticepaucityliteratureguidingprocesscollectingintegratingteamspurposequalitativeexploreNeonatalIntensiveCareUnitinformationaroundfindingsillustrateparalleloverlappingexperiencesgroupsdescribepositiveimpactbuildingsustainingrelationshipspersonalizationpersonhoodrevolvingrisksmiscommunicationnotedchallengesParentsdesirecontrolnarrativeseekingequalaccesssupportbestwaypossiblerelatedrolehighlightsqualitypositivelyimpactedclinicians'appreciationcomplexrelationshiplargeteamintensiveunitalsohighlightingdifficultiespracticalapplicationKnowledgelearnedcanutilizedinformdevelopmentprocessesimproveUnderstandingFamilyContext:QualitativeDescriptiveStudyParentClinicianExperiencesPerspectivesdecisionmakingneonatology

Similar Articles

Cited By