Exploring Sex Differences of Beta-Blockers in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nick Wilmes, Eveline M van Luik, Esmée W P Vaes, Maud A M Vesseur, Sophie A J S Laven, Zenab Mohseni-Alsalhi, Daniek A M Meijs, Cédric J R Dikovec, Sander de Haas, Marc E A Spaanderman, Chahinda Ghossein-Doha
Author Information
  1. Nick Wilmes: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  2. Eveline M van Luik: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Esmée W P Vaes: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  4. Maud A M Vesseur: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. ORCID
  5. Sophie A J S Laven: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. ORCID
  6. Zenab Mohseni-Alsalhi: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. ORCID
  7. Daniek A M Meijs: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  8. Cédric J R Dikovec: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands. ORCID
  9. Sander de Haas: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  10. Marc E A Spaanderman: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  11. Chahinda Ghossein-Doha: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

AIMS: In the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, early recognition and adequate treatment of hypertension are of leading importance. However, the efficacy of antihypertensives may be depending on sex disparities. Our objective was to evaluate and quantify the sex-diverse effects of beta-blockers (BB) on hypertension and cardiac function. We focussed on comparing hypertensive female versus male individuals.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search was performed for studies on BBs from inception to May 2020. A total of 66 studies were included that contained baseline and follow up measurements on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and cardiac function. Data also had to be stratified for sex. Mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model. In females as compared to males, BB treatment decreased systolic BP 11.1 mmHg (95% CI, -14.5; -7.8) vs. 11.1 mmHg (95% CI, -14.0; -8.2), diastolic BP 8.0 mmHg (95% CI, -10.6; -5.3) vs. 8.0 mmHg (95% CI, -10.1; -6.0), and HR 10.8 beats per minute (bpm) (95% CI, -17.4; -4.2) vs. 9.8 bpm (95% CI, -11.1; -8.4)), respectively, in both sexes' absolute and relative changes comparably. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased only in males (3.7% (95% CI, 0.6; 6.9)). Changes in left ventricular mass and cardiac output (CO) were only reported in males and changed -20.6 g (95% CI, -56.3; 15.1) and -0.1 L (95% CI, -0.5; 0.2), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: BBs comparably lowered BP and HR in both sexes. The lack of change in CO in males suggests that the reduction in BP is primarily due to a decrease in vascular resistance. Furthermore, females were underrepresented compared to males. We recommend that future research should include more females and sex-stratified data when researching the treatment effects of antihypertensives.

Keywords

References

  1. Circulation. 2008 Jun 24;117(25):e510-26 [PMID: 18574054]
  2. Eur Heart J. 1992 Jan;13(1):28-32 [PMID: 1533587]
  3. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;66(6):594-601 [PMID: 10613615]
  4. J Nucl Med. 1990 May;31(5):557-66 [PMID: 1971304]
  5. J Hypertens. 2001 Jun;19(6):1167-76 [PMID: 11403367]
  6. Circulation. 2005 Feb 1;111(4):499-510 [PMID: 15687140]
  7. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 [PMID: 3802833]
  8. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984 Jan-Feb;6(1):90-3 [PMID: 6199618]
  9. Br Heart J. 1978 Dec;40(12):1361-70 [PMID: 32899]
  10. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Feb 15;75(5):360-4 [PMID: 7856528]
  11. Hypertension. 2020 Sep;76(3):819-826 [PMID: 32654558]
  12. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e18331 [PMID: 31852127]
  13. Circulation. 1998 Jul 14;98(2):140-8 [PMID: 9679720]
  14. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jun 5;63(19):64I-68I [PMID: 2729126]
  15. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;18(1):113-23 [PMID: 14748763]
  16. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997 Mar;11(1):57-61 [PMID: 9140679]
  17. Chest. 1989 Jul;96(1):74-9 [PMID: 2544352]
  18. J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;33(2):195-211 [PMID: 25485720]
  19. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1975 Apr;17(4):379-84 [PMID: 1173059]
  20. Jpn Heart J. 1984 Nov;25(6):1029-45 [PMID: 6530747]
  21. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 11;72(11):1278-1293 [PMID: 30190007]
  22. Circulation. 2001 Jan 23;103(3):375-80 [PMID: 11157688]
  23. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Mar 1;57(8):678-81 [PMID: 2869679]
  24. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1985 Jan-Feb;7(1):80-5 [PMID: 2580155]
  25. Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):285-292 [PMID: 31865786]
  26. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249 [PMID: 33069327]
  27. Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):540-548 [PMID: 32065763]
  28. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1154-61 [PMID: 7897129]
  29. Angiology. 1990 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):696-701 [PMID: 1977335]
  30. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):163-182 [PMID: 28329228]
  31. Br Heart J. 1990 Jul;64(1):14-9 [PMID: 2390397]
  32. Am J Hypertens. 1990 Jun;3(6 Pt 1):458-63 [PMID: 2142428]
  33. Can Med Assoc J. 1968 May 25;98(21):988-94 [PMID: 4174139]
  34. Am J Cardiol. 1998 Jan 15;81(2):247-50 [PMID: 9591916]
  35. Hypertension. 2011 Jun;57(6):1122-8 [PMID: 21536983]
  36. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;29(6):659-65 [PMID: 2872054]
  37. Heart Fail Rev. 2004 Apr;9(2):149-59 [PMID: 15516863]
  38. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;264:7-11 [PMID: 29642997]
  39. Blood Press. 2015;24(4):222-9 [PMID: 25860402]
  40. BMJ. 2016 Apr 20;353:i1855 [PMID: 27098105]
  41. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 1:S27-34 [PMID: 1378146]
  42. Eur Heart J. 1988 Nov;9(11):1167-74 [PMID: 2906870]
  43. JAMA. 1981 Nov 6;246(18):2073-4 [PMID: 7026815]
  44. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Sep;38(3):266-72 [PMID: 4028620]
  45. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 7;41(9):1529-38 [PMID: 12742294]
  46. J Nucl Med. 1999 Feb;40(2):217-23 [PMID: 10025826]
  47. Lancet. 2020 Aug 22;396(10250):565-582 [PMID: 32828189]
  48. Circulation. 2002 Oct 22;106(17):2194-9 [PMID: 12390947]
  49. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(3):143-57 [PMID: 19385708]
  50. J Int Med Res. 1986;14(4):175-84 [PMID: 3758467]
  51. Drugs. 1990 Feb;39(2):234-63 [PMID: 2184002]
  52. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1992 Oct;6(5):475-9 [PMID: 1450092]
  53. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1977 Nov 14;12(3):171-4 [PMID: 579342]
  54. Hypertens Res. 1997 Jun;20(2):105-11 [PMID: 9220274]
  55. Am Heart J. 1993 May;125(5 Pt 1):1311-5 [PMID: 8386904]
  56. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jun 15;89(12):1431-4 [PMID: 12062744]
  57. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  58. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 [PMID: 31462531]
  59. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;55(2):134-8 [PMID: 12580984]
  60. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 5:S757-61 [PMID: 6084120]
  61. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1651-8 [PMID: 11386263]
  62. Am J Med. 1985 Oct 11;79(4A):36-40 [PMID: 2931978]
  63. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1984 Jul;22(7):365-70 [PMID: 6236155]
  64. Cardiology. 2006;106(3):147-53 [PMID: 16636544]
  65. Circulation. 2002 Apr 2;105(13):1585-91 [PMID: 11927527]
  66. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;30(8):930-937 [PMID: 29979644]
  67. Heart Lung Circ. 2011 Sep;20(9):566-73 [PMID: 21763198]
  68. Am Heart J. 1990 Jan;119(1):79-85 [PMID: 2296878]
  69. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Dec 17;42(12):2128-34 [PMID: 14680739]
  70. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2016 Jun;23(2):105-13 [PMID: 27106810]
  71. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Jun;3(3):331-3 [PMID: 11378004]
  72. Acta Med Okayama. 1994 Apr;48(2):87-91 [PMID: 8042538]
  73. Am Heart J. 2002 Feb;143(2):301-7 [PMID: 11835035]
  74. Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104 [PMID: 30165516]
  75. J Hum Hypertens. 1988 Dec;2(4):219-27 [PMID: 2907053]
  76. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;27(5):509-15 [PMID: 6151504]
  77. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1659-67 [PMID: 11386264]
  78. Hypertension. 2001 May;37(5):1216-21 [PMID: 11358931]
  79. Circulation. 2006 Feb 21;113(7):977-85 [PMID: 16476851]
  80. Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2001-7 [PMID: 10376614]
  81. Circulation. 1990 Aug;82(2):473-83 [PMID: 1973638]
  82. Eur Heart J. 1984 May;5(5):366-73 [PMID: 6734646]
  83. Am J Cardiol. 1981 Nov;48(5):917-28 [PMID: 6118060]
  84. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Dec 1;104(11):1568-73 [PMID: 19932794]
  85. J Card Fail. 2012 Mar;18(3):183-93 [PMID: 22385938]
  86. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):116-20 [PMID: 6186845]
  87. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Jun;261(3):1181-6 [PMID: 1602383]
  88. Chest. 1989 Jan;95(1):43-7 [PMID: 2521204]
  89. Int J Cardiol. 1984 Mar;5(3):317-25 [PMID: 6706437]
  90. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 8;71(18):1960-1969 [PMID: 29724348]
  91. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59 Suppl 3:98-103 [PMID: 6647215]
  92. Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743 [PMID: 33501848]
  93. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2002 Apr;7(2):133-8 [PMID: 12049685]
  94. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Aug 1;80(3):386-8 [PMID: 9264449]
  95. J Hypertens. 2006 Jul;24(7):1397-403 [PMID: 16794490]
  96. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1993 Apr;53(2):155-62 [PMID: 8469914]
  97. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Dec;3(6):441-6 [PMID: 19734185]
  98. Eur Heart J. 2005 Aug;26(16):1585-95 [PMID: 15996977]
  99. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):954-61 [PMID: 12970023]
  100. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Jul;14(1):120-2 [PMID: 7104164]
  101. BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):974 [PMID: 17975258]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.095%CI10BPmales8mmHg6treatmenthypertensionsexcardiacHRfemalesvs23antihypertensiveseffectsbeta-blockersBBfunctionsystematicstudiesBBsdifferencescompared11-145-8-10bpm49respectivelycomparablyventricularCO-0AIMS:preventioncardiovascularmorbiditymortalityearlyrecognitionadequateleadingimportanceHoweverefficacymaydependingdisparitiesobjectiveevaluatequantifysex-diversefocussedcomparinghypertensivefemaleversusmaleindividualsMETHODSANDRESULTS:searchperformedinceptionMay2020total66includedcontainedbaselinefollowmeasurementsbloodpressureheartrateDataalsostratifiedMeancalculatedusingrandom-effectsmodeldecreasedsystolic-7diastolic-5-610beatsperminute-17-4-11sexes'absoluterelativechangesLeftejectionfractionincreased7%Changesleftmassoutputreportedchanged-20g-5615LCONCLUSIONS:loweredsexeslackchangesuggestsreductionprimarilyduedecreasevascularresistanceFurthermoreunderrepresentedrecommendfutureresearchincludesex-stratifieddataresearchingExploringSexDifferencesBeta-BlockersTreatmentHypertension:SystematicReviewMeta-Analysismeta-analysisreview

Similar Articles

Cited By