Reversal Training Discloses Gender Differences in a Spatial Memory Task in Humans.

Laura Tascón, Irene León, Rubén Fernández, José Manuel Cimadevilla
Author Information
  1. Laura Tascón: Department of Psychology, University of Cordoba, C/San Alberto Magno, s/n, 14071 Cordoba, Spain. ORCID
  2. Irene León: Facultad de Educación, Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Av. de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
  3. Rubén Fernández: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almeria, Carretera de Sacramento s/n, 04120 Almeria, Spain.
  4. José Manuel Cimadevilla: Faculty of Psychology, University of Almeria, Carretera de Sacramento s/n, 04120 Almeria, Spain.

Abstract

Over the past few years, spatial memory has been studied using virtual-reality-based tasks. Reversal learning has been widely used in spatial orientation tasks for testing, among other things, new learning and flexibility. By means of a reversal-learning protocol, we assessed spatial memory in men and women. A total of sixty participants (half of them women) performed a task that included two phases: during the acquisition phase, participants were asked to find one or three rewarded positions in the virtual room across ten trials. During the reversal phase, the rewarded boxes were moved to a new position and maintained for four trials. The results showed that men and women differed in the reversal phase, with men outperforming women in high demanding conditions. Dissimilarities in several cognitive abilities between both genders are the base of these differences and are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Mar 15;196(1):45-50 [PMID: 21219930]
  2. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jun 9;651:188-191 [PMID: 28499888]
  3. Neurosci Lett. 2021 Apr 17;750:135711 [PMID: 33571575]
  4. Brain Res. 1971 Nov;34(1):171-5 [PMID: 5124915]
  5. Learn Mem. 2009 Mar 24;16(4):248-66 [PMID: 19318467]
  6. Scand J Psychol. 2007 Oct;48(5):353-8 [PMID: 17877549]
  7. Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):252-64 [PMID: 20708663]
  8. Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jan 1;216(1):116-21 [PMID: 20655953]
  9. Behav Brain Res. 2004 Jul 9;152(2):307-14 [PMID: 15196798]
  10. Brain Cogn. 2004 Jun;55(1):134-47 [PMID: 15134848]
  11. Hippocampus. 2021 Jul;31(7):658-668 [PMID: 33207019]
  12. Neural Netw. 2015 May;65:18-43 [PMID: 25659941]
  13. Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 07;11(6): [PMID: 34200351]
  14. Perception. 2006;35(9):1233-49 [PMID: 17120843]
  15. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Oct 10;192(2):248-53 [PMID: 18502521]
  16. Neuropharmacology. 2013 Jan;64:65-73 [PMID: 22732443]
  17. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Mar;22(3):167-179 [PMID: 33536614]
  18. Behav Brain Res. 2014 Aug 15;270:47-55 [PMID: 24815214]
  19. Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;115(3):695-703 [PMID: 11439458]
  20. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jun;93(1-2):185-90 [PMID: 9659999]
  21. Psicothema. 2011 Nov;23(4):752-8 [PMID: 22047869]
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Mar;14(3):138-46 [PMID: 20138795]
  23. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Feb 1;238:95-108 [PMID: 23078950]
  24. Behav Brain Res. 2022 Jan 24;417:113620 [PMID: 34624425]
  25. Neuropsychology. 2014 Jul;28(4):485-95 [PMID: 24588700]
  26. J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;25(9):1256-65 [PMID: 20823079]
  27. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007 Jan;17(1):34-52 [PMID: 17178604]
  28. Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 13;10(8): [PMID: 32823656]
  29. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jun 26;190(1):112-8 [PMID: 18374426]
  30. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 30;12:297 [PMID: 30104966]
  31. Neuroscience. 2020 Sep 1;443:140-147 [PMID: 32710913]
  32. Brain Cogn. 2005 Oct;59(1):52-9 [PMID: 15935538]
  33. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):871-889 [PMID: 32324034]
  34. J Gen Psychol. 1948 Jul;39:15-22 [PMID: 18889466]
  35. Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jun 1;306:8-12 [PMID: 26965569]
  36. Brain Cogn. 2015 Feb;93:42-53 [PMID: 25528435]
  37. Behav Brain Res. 2023 Mar 28;442:114323 [PMID: 36731657]
  38. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Jul;92(1):89-98 [PMID: 19248837]
  39. Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Oct;22(2):364-9 [PMID: 21873120]
  40. Hippocampus. 2020 Jul;30(7):733-744 [PMID: 32077554]
  41. Neurosci Res. 2020 Apr;153:1-7 [PMID: 31276699]
  42. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):336-42 [PMID: 19963014]
  43. Brain Res Bull. 2005 Jul 30;66(2):91-8 [PMID: 15982524]
  44. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):607-20 [PMID: 22134477]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0womenspatialmenphasememorytasksReversallearningnewflexibilityparticipantsrewardedvirtualtrialsreversaldifferencespastyearsstudiedusingvirtual-reality-basedwidelyusedorientationtestingamongthingsmeansreversal-learningprotocolassessedtotalsixtyhalfperformedtaskincludedtwophases:acquisitionaskedfindonethreepositionsroomacrosstenboxesmovedpositionmaintainedfourresultsshoweddifferedoutperforminghighdemandingconditionsDissimilaritiesseveralcognitiveabilitiesgendersbasediscussedTrainingDisclosesGenderDifferencesSpatialMemoryTaskHumansdimorphismhippocampussexreality

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)