Galactic Cosmic Irradiation Alters Acute and Delayed Species-Typical Behavior in Male and Female Mice.

Stephanie Puukila, Olivia Siu, Linda Rubinstein, Candice G T Tahimic, Moniece Lowe, Steffy Tabares Ruiz, Ivan Korostenskij, Maya Semel, Janani Iyer, Siddhita D Mhatre, Yasaman Shirazi-Fard, Joshua S Alwood, Amber M Paul, April E Ronca
Author Information
  1. Stephanie Puukila: Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
  2. Olivia Siu: Space Life Sciences Training Program (SLSTP), NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  3. Linda Rubinstein: Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD 21046, USA.
  4. Candice G T Tahimic: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  5. Moniece Lowe: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  6. Steffy Tabares Ruiz: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  7. Ivan Korostenskij: Department of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  8. Maya Semel: Department of Biology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
  9. Janani Iyer: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  10. Siddhita D Mhatre: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  11. Yasaman Shirazi-Fard: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA. ORCID
  12. Joshua S Alwood: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
  13. Amber M Paul: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA. ORCID
  14. April E Ronca: NASA, Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Exposure to space galactic cosmic radiation is a principal consideration for deep space missions. While the effects of space irradiation on the nervous system are not fully known, studies in animal models have shown that exposure to ionizing radiation can cause neuronal damage and lead to downstream cognitive and behavioral deficits. Cognitive health implications put humans and missions at risk, and with the upcoming Artemis missions in which female crew will play a major role, advance critical analysis of the neurological and performance responses of male and female rodents to space radiation is vital. Here, we tested the hypothesis that simulated Galactic Cosmic Radiation (GCRSim) exposure disrupts species-typical behavior in mice, including burrowing, rearing, grooming, and nest-building that depend upon hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortex circuitry. Behavior comprises a remarkably well-integrated representation of the biology of the whole animal that informs overall neural and physiological status, revealing functional impairment. We conducted a systematic dose-response analysis of mature (6-month-old) male and female mice exposed to either 5, 15, or 50 cGy 5-ion GCRSim (H, Si, He, O, Fe) at the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL). Behavioral performance was evaluated at 72 h (acute) and 91-days (delayed) postradiation exposure. Specifically, species-typical behavior patterns comprising burrowing, rearing, and grooming as well as nest building were analyzed. A Neuroscore test battery (spontaneous activity, proprioception, vibrissae touch, limb symmetry, lateral turning, forelimb outstretching, and climbing) was performed at the acute timepoint to investigate early sensorimotor deficits postirradiation exposure. Nest construction, a measure of neurological and organizational function in rodents, was evaluated using a five-stage Likert scale 'Deacon' score that ranged from 1 (a low score where the Nestlet is untouched) to 5 (a high score where the Nestlet is completely shredded and shaped into a nest). Differential acute responses were observed in females relative to males with respect to species-typical behavior following 15 cGy exposure while delayed responses were observed in female grooming following 50 cGy exposure. Significant sex differences were observed at both timepoints in nest building. No deficits in sensorimotor behavior were observed via the Neuroscore. This study revealed subtle, sexually dimorphic GCRSim exposure effects on mouse behavior. Our analysis provides a clearer understanding of GCR dose effects on species typical, sensorimotor and organizational behaviors at acute and delayed timeframes postirradiation, thereby setting the stage for the identification of underlying cellular and molecular events.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 15;12(1):2550 [PMID: 35169182]
  2. Behav Brain Res. 2022 Jul 26;430:113907 [PMID: 35500721]
  3. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;121:317-21 [PMID: 26463968]
  4. J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Jul 30;209(1):74-8 [PMID: 22698663]
  5. Behav Processes. 2022 Sep;201:104713 [PMID: 35901935]
  6. J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Apr 15;300:26-36 [PMID: 28414048]
  7. Physiol Behav. 2019 Jul 1;206:59-66 [PMID: 30790576]
  8. Behav Processes. 2017 Feb;135:71-75 [PMID: 27939810]
  9. Sci Adv. 2015 May 1;1(4): [PMID: 26180843]
  10. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Nov;23(11):941-7 [PMID: 25401937]
  11. Behav Brain Res. 2022 Feb 10;418:113652 [PMID: 34758364]
  12. J Neurosci Res. 2021 Sep;99(9):2046-2058 [PMID: 34048600]
  13. Behav Brain Res. 2014 May 1;264:151-60 [PMID: 24518201]
  14. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2023 Feb;36:90-104 [PMID: 36682835]
  15. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 31;13(1):1749 [PMID: 36720960]
  16. Neuron. 2012 Dec 20;76(6):1057-70 [PMID: 23259943]
  17. Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 12;10:179 [PMID: 30914962]
  18. J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Apr 15;300:37-47 [PMID: 28456660]
  19. Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 10;15:832535 [PMID: 35082600]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 6;104(6):1983-8 [PMID: 17261803]
  21. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Oct 30;14:575434 [PMID: 33192366]
  22. Eur J Neurosci. 2003 May;17(10):2147-55 [PMID: 12786981]
  23. Radiat Res. 2022 Oct 1;198(4):375-383 [PMID: 36223207]
  24. Stroke. 1995 Apr;26(4):627-34; discussion 635 [PMID: 7709410]
  25. Mol Brain. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):37 [PMID: 29970188]
  26. Front Physiol. 2020 Aug 28;11:959 [PMID: 32982769]
  27. Brain Behav Immun. 2018 Nov;74:106-120 [PMID: 30107198]
  28. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jan;17(1):45-59 [PMID: 26675822]
  29. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 10;6:34774 [PMID: 27721383]
  30. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 10;40:213-20 [PMID: 23367508]
  31. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020 Sep 16;14:535885 [PMID: 33192361]
  32. Exp Neurol. 2018 Jul;305:44-55 [PMID: 29540322]
  33. Neuropharmacology. 2020 Oct 15;177:108254 [PMID: 32726598]
  34. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1117-9 [PMID: 17406392]
  35. Stress. 2018 Sep;21(5):443-452 [PMID: 29451062]
  36. Radiat Res. 1992 Apr;130(1):88-93 [PMID: 1561322]
  37. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 20;19(4): [PMID: 29677125]
  38. Behav Neurol. 2018 May 09;2018:8728415 [PMID: 29854021]
  39. J Vis Exp. 2018 Jan 30;(131): [PMID: 29443022]
  40. Nat Protoc. 2018 Jun;13(6):1331-1347 [PMID: 29773907]
  41. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 2;11(1):4961 [PMID: 33654141]
  42. Sci Adv. 2021 Oct 15;7(42):eabg6702 [PMID: 34652936]
  43. Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 19;11(2): [PMID: 33669543]
  44. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Dec 20;215(1):83-94 [PMID: 20615433]
  45. Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;86(9):657-668 [PMID: 31255250]
  46. Radiat Res. 2022 Mar 1;197(3):289-297 [PMID: 34905619]
  47. Exp Brain Res. 2023 Feb;241(2):427-440 [PMID: 36574036]
  48. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 2;14(8):e0220751 [PMID: 31374097]
  49. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 20;9(1):12118 [PMID: 31431669]
  50. Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Jan 16;9:9 [PMID: 29416906]
  51. Behav Processes. 2016 Jan;122:21-5 [PMID: 26524409]
  52. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jan;132:908-935 [PMID: 34767877]
  53. Radiat Res. 2016 Apr;185(4):349-58 [PMID: 27018778]

Grants

  1. NASA HRP 80JSC018N0001-FLAGSHIP/HRP Human Factors Behavioral Performance

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exposurebehaviorspaceradiationfemaleacuteobservedmissionseffectsdeficitsanalysisresponsesGCRSimspecies-typicalgroomingcGydelayednestsensorimotorscoreanimalneurologicalperformancemalerodentsGalacticCosmicRadiationmiceburrowingrearingBehavior51550evaluatedbuildingNeuroscorepostirradiationorganizationalNestletfollowingsexdifferencesGCRExposuregalacticcosmicprincipalconsiderationdeepirradiationnervoussystemfullyknownstudiesmodelsshownionizingcancauseneuronaldamageleaddownstreamcognitivebehavioralCognitivehealthimplicationsputhumansriskupcomingArtemiscrewwillplaymajorroleadvancecriticalvitaltestedhypothesissimulateddisruptsincludingnest-buildingdependuponhippocampalmedialprefrontalcortexcircuitrycomprisesremarkablywell-integratedrepresentationbiologywholeinformsoverallneuralphysiologicalstatusrevealingfunctionalimpairmentconductedsystematicdose-responsemature6-month-oldexposedeither5-ionHSiOFeNASASpaceLaboratoryNSRLBehavioral72h91-dayspostradiationSpecificallypatternscomprisingwellanalyzedtestbatteryspontaneousactivityproprioceptionvibrissaetouchlimbsymmetrylateralturningforelimboutstretchingclimbingperformedtimepointinvestigateearlyNestconstructionmeasurefunctionusingfive-stageLikertscale'Deacon'ranged1lowuntouchedhighcompletelyshreddedshapedDifferentialfemalesrelativemalesrespectSignificanttimepointsviastudyrevealedsubtlesexuallydimorphicmouseprovidesclearerunderstandingdosespeciestypicalbehaviorstimeframestherebysettingstageidentificationunderlyingcellularmoleculareventsIrradiationAltersAcuteDelayedSpecies-TypicalMaleFemaleMicecognitionrodent

Similar Articles

Cited By