A model of porcine polymicrobial septic shock.

Finnja Marie Zurek-Leffers, Florian Lehmann, Laura Brabenec, Sebastian Kintrup, Katharina E M Hellenthal, Kira Mersjann, Felicia Kneifel, Michael Hessler, Philip-Helge Arnemann, Tim-Gerald Kampmeier, Christian Ertmer, Patrick Kellner, Nana-Maria Wagner
Author Information
  1. Finnja Marie Zurek-Leffers: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  2. Florian Lehmann: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  3. Laura Brabenec: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  4. Sebastian Kintrup: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  5. Katharina E M Hellenthal: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  6. Kira Mersjann: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  7. Felicia Kneifel: Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
  8. Michael Hessler: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  9. Philip-Helge Arnemann: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  10. Tim-Gerald Kampmeier: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  11. Christian Ertmer: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
  12. Patrick Kellner: Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  13. Nana-Maria Wagner: Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. nmwagner@uni-muenster.de. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Mortality of patients with sepsis is high and largely unchanged throughout the past decades. Animal models have been widely used for the study of sepsis and septic shock, but translation into effective treatment regimes in the clinic have mostly failed. Pigs are considered as suitable research models for human diseases due to their high comparability and similarity to human anatomy, genetics, and the immune system. We here evaluated the previously reported models of septic shock in pigs and established a novel model of polymicrobial sepsis that meets the clinical criteria of septic shock in pigs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature search was performed using the keywords "pig", "sepsis" and "septic shock". For the establishment of septic shock in n = 10 German landrace pigs, mechanical ventilation was initiated, central venous and arterial lines and invasive hemodynamic monitoring via pulse contour cardiac output measurement (PiCCO) established. Peritoneal polymicrobial faecal sepsis was induced by application of 3 g/kg body weight faeces into the abdominal cavity. Septic shock was defined according to the third international consensus definitions (Sepsis-3). Upon shock, pigs underwent the 1-h bundle for the treatment of human sepsis. Cytokine levels were measured by ELISA.
RESULTS: Published porcine sepsis models exhibited high methodological variability and did not meet the clinical criteria of septic shock. In our model, septic shock developed after an average of 4.8 ± 0.29 h and was associated with a reproducible drop in blood pressure (mean arterial pressure 54 ± 1 mmHg) and significant hyperlactatemia (3.76 ± 0.65 mmol/L). Septic shock was associated with elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL6) and initial cardiac depression followed by a hyperdynamic phase with significant loss of systemic vascular resistance index after initial resuscitation. In addition, organ dysfunction (acute kidney injury) occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: We here established a model of septic shock in pigs that meets the clinical criteria of septic shock utilized in human patients. Our model may thus serve as a reference for clinically relevant sepsis research in pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007 Aug;21(4):237-42 [PMID: 17541714]
  2. J Pers Med. 2021 Feb 28;11(3): [PMID: 33670874]
  3. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 [PMID: 26903338]
  4. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Aug 14;6(1):26 [PMID: 30112605]
  5. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928 [PMID: 29675566]
  6. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Apr;50(4):407-13 [PMID: 16548852]
  7. J Immunol. 2013 Jul 15;191(2):819-27 [PMID: 23761634]
  8. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377 [PMID: 28101605]
  9. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:181845 [PMID: 26543849]
  10. Trends Microbiol. 2012 Jan;20(1):50-7 [PMID: 22153753]
  11. Sci Transl Med. 2021 Nov 24;13(621):eabd5758 [PMID: 34818055]
  12. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Jul 25;7(Suppl 1):45 [PMID: 31346833]
  13. Shock. 2015 Mar;43(3):285-91 [PMID: 25394247]
  14. J Invest Surg. 2001 Jul-Aug;14(4):195-212 [PMID: 11680530]
  15. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S30-7 [PMID: 19104223]
  16. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021;78(3):325-338 [PMID: 33843666]
  17. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2016 Dec;4(1):14 [PMID: 27271248]
  18. Vet Microbiol. 2021 Feb;253:108958 [PMID: 33387911]
  19. Virulence. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):143-53 [PMID: 24022070]
  20. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1400-1426 [PMID: 29971592]
  21. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Aug 8;6(1):24 [PMID: 30091119]
  22. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2021 Aug;65(2):167-175 [PMID: 33798037]
  23. J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:492-501 [PMID: 31330293]
  24. Exp Mol Med. 2021 Jul;53(7):1116-1123 [PMID: 34253862]
  25. Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143 [PMID: 34605781]
  26. Clin Kidney J. 2020 Oct 10;14(2):526-536 [PMID: 33623675]
  27. J Anim Sci. 1973 May;36(5):927-30 [PMID: 4703721]
  28. Br J Anaesth. 2022 May;128(5):864-873 [PMID: 35131096]
  29. Semin Immunopathol. 2017 Jul;39(5):517-528 [PMID: 28555385]
  30. Shock. 2005 Dec;24 Suppl 1:1-6 [PMID: 16374365]
  31. Crit Care. 2019 Jan 17;23(1):16 [PMID: 30654825]
  32. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 Sep;18(9):26 [PMID: 27432263]
  33. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Mar;59(3):346-53 [PMID: 25557933]
  34. Trends Microbiol. 2011 Apr;19(4):198-208 [PMID: 21296575]
  35. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):31-6 [PMID: 19131954]
  36. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Mar;22(3):484-95 [PMID: 21355054]
  37. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 09;9:867796 [PMID: 35615093]

Grants

  1. WA3786/3-1/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0shocksepticsepsispigsmodelmodelshumanhighestablishedpolymicrobialclinicalcriteriaSepticSepsisorgandysfunctionpatientsAnimaltreatmentresearchmeetsarterialcardiaclevelsporcineassociatedpressuresignificantinitialBACKGROUND:life-threateningcauseddysregulatedhostresponseinfectionMortalitylargelyunchangedthroughoutpastdecadeswidelyusedstudytranslationeffectiveregimesclinicmostlyfailedPigsconsideredsuitablediseasesduecomparabilitysimilarityanatomygeneticsimmunesystemevaluatedpreviouslyreportednovelMATERIALSANDMETHODS:literaturesearchperformedusingkeywords"pig""sepsis""septicshock"establishmentn = 10GermanlandracemechanicalventilationinitiatedcentralvenouslinesinvasivehemodynamicmonitoringviapulsecontouroutputmeasurementPiCCOPeritonealfaecalinducedapplication3 g/kgbodyweightfaecesabdominalcavitydefinedaccordingthirdinternationalconsensusdefinitionsSepsis-3Uponunderwent1-hbundleCytokinemeasuredELISARESULTS:Publishedexhibitedmethodologicalvariabilitymeetdevelopedaverage48 ± 029 hreproducibledropbloodmean54 ± 1 mmHghyperlactatemia376 ± 065 mmol/Lelevatedinterleukin-6IL6depressionfollowedhyperdynamicphaselosssystemicvascularresistanceindexresuscitationadditionacutekidneyinjuryoccurredCONCLUSIONS:utilizedmaythusservereferenceclinicallyrelevantFaecalperitonitisPig

Similar Articles

Cited By