Drivers and constraints to environmental sustainability in UK-based biobanking: balancing resource efficiency and future value.

Gabrielle Samuel, Jessica M Sims
Author Information
  1. Gabrielle Samuel: Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. gabrielle.samuel@kcl.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Jessica M Sims: Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biobanks are a key aspect of healthcare research; they enable access to a wide range of heterogenous samples and data, as well as saving individual researchers time and funds on the collection, storage and/or curation of such resources. However, biobanks are also associated with impacts associated with a depletion of natural resources (energy, water etc.) production of toxic chemicals during manufacturing of laboratory equipment, and effects on biodiversity. We wanted to better understand the biobanking sector in the UK as a first step to assessing the environmental impacts of UK biobanking.
METHODS: We explored the sample storage infrastructure and environmental sustainability practices at a number of UK biobanks through a mixed methods quantitative and qualitative approach, including information gathering on an online platform, and eight in-depth interviews.
RESULTS: Environmental sustainability was deprioritised behind biobanks' financial sustainability practices. Nevertheless, both often aligned in practice. However, there was a tendency towards underutilisation of stored samples, the avoidance of centralisation, and providing accessibility to biosamples, and this conflicted with valuing sustainability goals. This related to notions of individualised and competitive biobanking culture. Furthermore, the study raised how value attachments to biosamples overshadows needs for both financial and environmental sustainability concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: We need to move away from individualised and competitive biobanking cultures towards a realisation that the health of the publics and patients should be first and foremost. We need to ensure the use of biosamples, ahead of their storage ('smart attachments'), align with environmental sustainability goals and participants' donation wishes for biosample use.

Keywords

References

  1. Biopreserv Biobank. 2012 Dec;10(6):511-7 [PMID: 24845137]
  2. New Genet Soc. 2017 Sep 06;36(4):336-353 [PMID: 29238265]
  3. J Transl Med. 2019 May 22;17(1):172 [PMID: 31118074]
  4. Ann Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;41(2):139-144 [PMID: 33063675]
  5. Sci Data. 2016 Mar 15;3:160018 [PMID: 26978244]
  6. Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Aug;18(4):266-273 [PMID: 32551838]
  7. J Med Ethics. 2023 Jun;49(6):428-433 [PMID: 35922120]
  8. Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Aug 16;: [PMID: 35969375]
  9. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1344-1354 [PMID: 34031552]
  10. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 15;12(4):e047309 [PMID: 35428611]
  11. Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Apr;17(2):129-138 [PMID: 30638412]
  12. Glob Bioeth. 2022 Feb 24;33(1):50-64 [PMID: 35221664]
  13. Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Jun;19(3):228-240 [PMID: 34042498]
  14. Minerva. 2016;54:201-218 [PMID: 27340296]
  15. JOMEC J. 2013 Jun 01;3:10244 [PMID: 33604037]
  16. Sci Technol Human Values. 2010 May 1;35(3):330-355 [PMID: 20526462]
  17. Biopreserv Biobank. 2015 Dec;13(6):401-9 [PMID: 26697909]
  18. Sci Technol Human Values. 2017 May;42(3):460-490 [PMID: 28458406]
  19. Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Jun;17(3):213-218 [PMID: 31188630]
  20. Biopreserv Biobank. 2017 Feb;15(1):1-2 [PMID: 27860502]
  21. Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Nov 11;43(4):115 [PMID: 34762203]
  22. Biopreserv Biobank. 2014 Feb;12(1):60-8 [PMID: 24620771]
  23. Biopreserv Biobank. 2014 Dec;12(6):381-8 [PMID: 25496149]
  24. Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 06;12:720880 [PMID: 34421773]
  25. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Sep 24;16(9):e1008148 [PMID: 32970666]
  26. Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Jun;20(3):271-282 [PMID: 34756100]
  27. Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7906):420-424 [PMID: 35444313]
  28. Neuron. 2020 Apr 8;106(1):17-20 [PMID: 32272064]

MeSH Term

Humans
Biological Specimen Banks
Biomedical Research
Health Services Research
Research Personnel
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sustainabilityenvironmentalbiobankingstorageimpactsUKbiosamplessamplesresourcesHoweverbiobanksassociatedfirstpracticesEnvironmentalfinancialtowardsgoalsindividualisedcompetitivevalueneeduseBACKGROUND:Biobankskeyaspecthealthcareresearchenableaccesswiderangeheterogenousdatawellsavingindividualresearcherstimefundscollectionand/orcurationalsodepletionnaturalenergywateretcproductiontoxicchemicalsmanufacturinglaboratoryequipmenteffectsbiodiversitywantedbetterunderstandsectorstepassessingMETHODS:exploredsampleinfrastructurenumbermixedmethodsquantitativequalitativeapproachincludinginformationgatheringonlineplatformeightin-depthinterviewsRESULTS:deprioritisedbehindbiobanks'NeverthelessoftenalignedpracticetendencyunderutilisationstoredavoidancecentralisationprovidingaccessibilityconflictedvaluingrelatednotionscultureFurthermorestudyraisedattachmentsovershadowsneedsconcernsCONCLUSIONS:moveawayculturesrealisationhealthpublicspatientsforemostensureahead'smartattachments'alignparticipants'donationwishesbiosampleDriversconstraintsUK-basedbiobanking:balancingresourceefficiencyfutureBiobankBiobankingBioresourceBiosamplesEthicsHealthSustainabilityValueValues

Similar Articles

Cited By