Caregiver perspectives on a water safety toolkit for child supervision.

Erin R Morgan, Isabell Sakamoto, Alan Ardelean, Alejandra Diaz-Rohena, Allison Falk, Cara Starnes, Frederick P Rivara, Monica Vavilala
Author Information
  1. Erin R Morgan: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. ORCID
  2. Isabell Sakamoto: Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  3. Alan Ardelean: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  4. Alejandra Diaz-Rohena: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  5. Allison Falk: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  6. Cara Starnes: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  7. Frederick P Rivara: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  8. Monica Vavilala: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Drowning is one of the leading causes of unintentional deaths among children and adolescents globally. Adult supervision is one method to decrease the risk of drowning among youth.
METHODS: We sought to assess the acceptability of a Water Watcher toolkit among children's caregivers. The toolkit consists of a badge-to designate the adult(s) responsible for supervision during water activities-and a smartphone application. When activated, the application blocks incoming calls, text messages and other applications, for example, mobile games and social media, as well as providing a button to quickly dial 911 and information for guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We conducted online and in-person semi-structured interviews of 16 adults residing in Washington State, United States and providing supervision to a child under 18 years of age for at least 20 h per week. Interview guides were developed based on the Health Belief Model and we performed content analysis on interview transcripts using an inductive approach.
RESULTS: When asked about Water Watcher tools, respondents generally reacted favourably towards the intervention, citing benefits of formally delegating a responsible party during group activities and elimination of distractions. Primary challenges to using the toolkit were social acceptability, competence with technology, and the independence of older children (i.e., those 13- to 17-years-old).
CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers recognized the importance of minimizing distractions, and many liked the strategy to formally designate responsibility for child supervision during aquatic recreation. SO WHAT?: Interventions such as the Water Watcher toolkit are generally considered acceptable and expanding access to these resources could reduce the burden of unintentional drownings.

Keywords

References

  1. The World Health Organization. Drowning. 2021 Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drowning
  2. Morrongiello BA, Sandomierski M, Spence JR. Changes over swim lessons in parents' perceptions of children's supervision needs in drowning risk situations: “his swimming has improved so now he can keep himself safe”. Health Psychol. 2014;33(7):608–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033881
  3. Mackay J, Steel A, Dykstra H, Wheeler T, Samuel E, Green A. Keeping kids safe in and around water: Exploring misconceptions that lead to drowning. 2016 Available from: https://www.safekids.org/research-report/keeping-kids-safe-and-around-water-exploring-misconceptions-lead-drowning
  4. World Health Organization. Global report on drowning|Preventing a Leading Killer. Spain: WHO; 2014 Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/143893/9789241564786_eng.pdf
  5. Petrass LA, Blitvich JD, Finch CF. Self‐reported supervisory behavior and belief vs. actual observations of caregiver behavior at beaches. Int J Aqua Res Educ. 2011;5(2):199–209. Available from: http://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/ijare/vol5/iss2/7/
  6. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Injury Violence and Poison Prevention. Prevention of drowning. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1):178–85. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1264
  7. Denny SA, Quan L, Gilchrist J, McCallin T, Shenoi R, Yusuf S, et al. Prevention of drowning. Pediatrics. 2021;148:2.
  8. Drowning Prevention Research Centre for the Lifesaving Society. Ontario drowning report, 2017 edition. 2017 Available from: http://www.lifesavingsociety.com/media/261247/ontario_drowning_report_2017_selfprint.pdf
  9. Otter.ai. Otter. Mountain View, CA: Otter.ai, Inc.; 2021 Available from: https://otter.ai/
  10. Peden AE, Franklin RC. Causes of distraction leading to supervision lapses in cases of fatal drowning of children 0–4 years in Australia: a 15‐year review. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56(3):450–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14668
  11. Anderson KR, Ramos WD, Schuman JT. The role of permission, supervision, and precipitating events in childhood Pool/Spa submersion incidents, United States, 2000–2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8776.
  12. Morrongiello BA. Mothers' home‐safety practices for preventing six types of childhood injuries: what do they do, and why? J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(4):285–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsh030
  13. Morrongiello BA, Sandomierski M, Schwebel DC, Hagel B. Are parents just treading water? The impact of participation in swim lessons on parents' judgments of children's drowning risk, swimming ability, and supervision needs. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;50:1169–75.
  14. Morrongiello BA, Corbett M. Using a virtual environment to study child pedestrian behaviours: a comparison of parents' expectations and children's street crossing behaviour. Injury Prev. 2015;21(5):291–5.
  15. Willcox‐Pidgeon SM, Peden AE, Scarr J. Exploring children's participation in commercial swimming lessons through the social determinants of health. Health Promot J Austral. 2021;32(2):172–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.335
  16. Blum C. Toddler drowning in domestic swimming pools. Injury Prev. 2000;6(4):288–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.6.4.288
  17. Wickens N, Wallace R, Dare J, Costello L, Lo J, Nimmo L. Mobile phone use and social interactions among caregivers can reduce their ability to provide constant supervision to children at Australian public swimming pools. Health Promot J Austral. 2021;32(S2):147–57.
  18. Raess L, Darms A, Meyer‐Heim A. Drowning in children: retrospective analysis of incident characteristics, predicting parameters, and long‐term outcome. Children. 2020;7(7):70.
  19. Willcox‐Pidgeon SM, Franklin RC, Leggat PA, Devine S. Identifying a gap in drowning prevention: high‐risk populations. Injury Prev. 2020;26(3):279–88. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043432
  20. Quan L, Crispin B, Bennett E, Gomez A. Beliefs and practices to prevent drowning among Vietnamese‐American adolescents and parents. Injury Prev. 2006;12(6):427–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2006.011486
  21. Wallis BA, Watt K, Franklin RC, Taylor M, Nixon JW, Kimble RM. Interventions associated with drowning prevention in children and adolescents: systematic literature review. Injury Prev. 2015;21(3):195–204. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041216
  22. O'Flaherty JE, Pirie PL. Prevention of pediatric drowning and near‐drowning: a survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 1997;99(2):169–74.
  23. Barkin S, Gelberg L. Sink or swim—clinicians don't often counsel on drowning prevention. Pediatrics. 1999;104(5 Pt 2):1217–9.

Grants

  1. R25 HD094336/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Child
Adult
Adolescent
Humans
United States
Infant
Drowning
Caregivers
Mobile Applications
Video Games
Water

Chemicals

Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0supervisiontoolkitunintentionalamongchildrenWaterWatcherchildonedrowningacceptabilitydesignateresponsiblewaterapplicationsocialprovidingusinggenerallyformallydistractionsISSUEADDRESSED:DrowningleadingcausesdeathsadolescentsgloballyAdultmethoddecreaseriskyouthMETHODS:soughtassesschildren'scaregiversconsistsbadge-toadultsactivities-andsmartphoneactivatedblocksincomingcallstextmessagesapplicationsexamplemobilegamesmediawellbuttonquicklydial911informationguidedcardiopulmonaryresuscitationconductedonlinein-personsemi-structuredinterviews16adultsresidingWashingtonStateUnitedStates18 yearsageleast20 hperweekInterviewguidesdevelopedbasedHealthBeliefModelperformedcontentanalysisinterviewtranscriptsinductiveapproachRESULTS:askedtoolsrespondentsreactedfavourablytowardsinterventioncitingbenefitsdelegatingpartygroupactivitieseliminationPrimarychallengescompetencetechnologyindependenceolderie13-17-years-oldCONCLUSIONS:CaregiversrecognizedimportanceminimizingmanylikedstrategyresponsibilityaquaticrecreationSOWHAT?:InterventionsconsideredacceptableexpandingaccessresourcesreduceburdendrowningsCaregiverperspectivessafetypaediatricsqualitativeinjury

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.