FDM data driven U-Net as a 2D Laplace PINN solver.

Anto Nivin Maria Antony, Narendra Narisetti, Evgeny Gladilin
Author Information
  1. Anto Nivin Maria Antony: Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr. 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany. maria@ipk-gatersleben.de.
  2. Narendra Narisetti: Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr. 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
  3. Evgeny Gladilin: Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, OT Gatersleben, Corrensstr. 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany. gladilin@ipk-gatersleben.de.

Abstract

Efficient solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) of physical laws is of interest for manifold applications in computer science and image analysis. However, conventional domain discretization techniques for numerical solving PDEs such as Finite Difference (FDM), Finite Element (FEM) methods are unsuitable for real-time applications and are also quite laborious in adaptation to new applications, especially for non-experts in numerical mathematics and computational modeling. More recently, alternative approaches to solving PDEs using the so-called Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) received increasing attention because of their straightforward application to new data and potentially more efficient performance. In this work, we present a novel data-driven approach to solve 2D Laplace PDE with arbitrary boundary conditions using deep learning models trained on a large set of reference FDM solutions. Our experimental results show that both forward and inverse 2D Laplace problems can efficiently be solved using the proposed PINN approach with nearly real-time performance and average accuracy of 94% for different types of boundary value problems compared to FDM. In summary, our deep learning based PINN PDE solver provides an efficient tool with various applications in image analysis and computational simulation of image-based physical boundary value problems.

References

  1. PeerJ. 2015 Dec 10;3:e1490 [PMID: 26713241]
  2. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Feb;63(2):269-77 [PMID: 26186761]
  3. ACM Trans Graph. 2009 Dec 1;27(5):165 [PMID: 19956777]
  4. J Biomech Eng. 2009 Jan;131(1):011014 [PMID: 19045930]
  5. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2020 Jun 4;22:309-341 [PMID: 32501772]
  6. PeerJ. 2014 Jun 19;2:e453 [PMID: 25024921]
  7. Math Biosci. 2005 Dec;198(2):169-89 [PMID: 16140344]
  8. NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Nov 25;2:115 [PMID: 31799423]
  9. Phys Biol. 2007 Jun 12;4(2):104-13 [PMID: 17664655]
  10. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 Apr;26(4):1745-1759 [PMID: 30442607]
  11. Med Image Anal. 2020 Jan;59:101569 [PMID: 31704451]
  12. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015 Jul;10(7):1077-95 [PMID: 25241111]
  13. J Biomech. 2011 Oct 13;44(15):2642-8 [PMID: 21906741]
  14. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:279-299 [PMID: 28633565]
  15. Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jan 10;124(1):010508 [PMID: 31976717]
  16. Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7743):195-204 [PMID: 30760912]
  17. Biophys Rev (Melville). 2022 Jun;3(2):021304 [PMID: 35602761]

Grants

  1. FKZ 031B0770A/German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0applicationsFDMPDEsusing2DLaplaceboundaryproblemsPINNphysicalimageanalysisnumericalsolvingFinitereal-timenewcomputationaldataefficientperformanceapproachPDEdeeplearningvaluesolverEfficientsolutionpartialdifferentialequationslawsinterestmanifoldcomputerscienceHoweverconventionaldomaindiscretizationtechniquesDifferenceElementFEMmethodsunsuitablealsoquitelaboriousadaptationespeciallynon-expertsmathematicsmodelingrecentlyalternativeapproachesso-calledPhysicallyInformedNeuralNetworksPINNsreceivedincreasingattentionstraightforwardapplicationpotentiallyworkpresentnoveldata-drivensolvearbitraryconditionsmodelstrainedlargesetreferencesolutionsexperimentalresultsshowforwardinversecanefficientlysolvedproposednearlyaverageaccuracy94%differenttypescomparedsummarybasedprovidestoolvarioussimulationimage-baseddrivenU-Net

Similar Articles

Cited By