A Novel Incisionless Disposable Vaginal Device for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Quality of Life.

Chung Lyul Lee, Jong Mok Park, Ji Yong Lee, Seung Woo Yang, Hyun Seok Na, Jaegeun Lee, Sunkyung Jung, Ju Hyun Shin
Author Information
  1. Chung Lyul Lee: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
  2. Jong Mok Park: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea.
  3. Ji Yong Lee: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
  4. Seung Woo Yang: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
  5. Hyun Seok Na: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
  6. Jaegeun Lee: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
  7. Sunkyung Jung: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea.
  8. Ju Hyun Shin: Department of Urology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This clinical study sought to evaluate the possible clinical effectiveness and practicality of URINO, an innovative, incisionless, and disposable intravaginal device, designed for patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial was carried out, involving women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence who used a self-inserted, disposable intravaginal pessary device. Comparisons were made between the results of the 20-minute pad-weight gain (PWG) test at baseline and visit 3, where the device was applied. After 1 week of device usage, compliance, satisfaction, the sensation of a foreign body, and adverse events were assessed.
RESULTS: Out of 45 participants, 39 completed the trial and expressed satisfaction within the modified intention-to-treat group. The average 20-minute PWG of participants was 17.2±33.6 g at baseline and significantly dropped to 5.3±16.2 g at visit 3 with device application. A total of 87.2% of participants exhibited a reduction ratio of PWG by 50% or more, surpassing the clinical trial success benchmark of 76%. The mean compliance was recorded as 76.6%±26.6%, the average visual analogue scale score for patient satisfaction was 6.4±2.6, and the sensation of a foreign body, measured on a 5-point Likert scale, was 3.1±1.2 after 1 week of device use. No serious adverse events were reported; there was 1 instance of microscopic hematuria and 2 cases of pyuria, all of which recovered.
CONCLUSION: The investigated device demonstrated significant clinical effectiveness and safety for patients with stress urinary incontinence. It was easy to use, showing favorable patient compliance. We propose that these disposable intravaginal pessaries could potentially be an alternative treatment for patients with stress urinary incontinence who are seeking nonsurgical options or are unable to undergo surgery. Trial Registration: The study was registered as a clinical trial (KCT0008369).

Keywords

References

  1. Int Neurourol J. 2020 Sep;24(3):222-230 [PMID: 33017893]
  2. BJU Int. 2014 Aug;114(2):268-77 [PMID: 24512557]
  3. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):360-364 [PMID: 32453209]
  4. J Urol. 2017 Oct;198(4):875-883 [PMID: 28625508]
  5. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Mar;149(1):106-11 [PMID: 20036048]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 6;358(10):1029-36 [PMID: 18322284]
  7. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):433-477 [PMID: 30681183]
  8. Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 28;14:1871-1880 [PMID: 36597480]
  9. Sports Med. 2004;34(7):451-64 [PMID: 15233598]
  10. BJU Int. 2001 Dec;88(9):889-92 [PMID: 11851609]
  11. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1251-1254 [PMID: 34558386]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1230-1243 [PMID: 35353961]
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):594.e1-7 [PMID: 18377862]
  14. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 17;10:195-201 [PMID: 29713205]
  15. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Feb;40(2):653-658 [PMID: 33348425]
  16. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000 Jul;55(7):455-60 [PMID: 10885651]
  17. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(4):210-3 [PMID: 9795826]
  18. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):938-42 [PMID: 10362158]
  19. Res Rep Urol. 2019 Apr 17;11:111-121 [PMID: 31114767]
  20. Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Oct;12(5):358-62 [PMID: 21847532]
  21. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Oct;32(10):2857-2862 [PMID: 34459926]
  22. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):284-91 [PMID: 21412819]
  23. Urology. 2006 Oct;68(4):764-8 [PMID: 17070349]

Grants

  1. /RimHealthcare, Inc.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0deviceclinicalincontinencestressurinarytrialdisposableintravaginalpatientsPWG31compliancesatisfactionparticipants62studyeffectiveness20-minutebaselinevisitweeksensationforeignbodyadverseeventsaveragegscalepatientuseStressUrinaryPURPOSE:soughtevaluatepossiblepracticalityURINOinnovativeincisionlessdesignedsufferingMETHODS:prospectivemulticentersingle-armcarriedinvolvingwomendiagnosedusedself-insertedpessaryComparisonsmaderesultspad-weightgaintestappliedusageassessedRESULTS:4539completedexpressedwithinmodifiedintention-to-treatgroup172±33significantlydropped53±16applicationtotal872%exhibitedreductionratio50%surpassingsuccessbenchmark76%meanrecorded766%±266%visualanaloguescore4±2measured5-pointLikert1±1seriousreportedinstancemicroscopichematuriacasespyuriarecoveredCONCLUSION:investigateddemonstratedsignificantsafetyeasyshowingfavorableproposepessariespotentiallyalternativetreatmentseekingnonsurgicaloptionsunableundergosurgeryTrialRegistration:registeredKCT0008369NovelIncisionlessDisposableVaginalDeviceFemaleIncontinence:EfficacyQualityLifeMidurethraPessaries

Similar Articles

Cited By