Government regulation strategy, leading firms' innovation strategy, and following firms imitation strategy: An analysis based on evolutionary game theory.

Mengke Zhang, Yan Huang, Yifan Jin, Yuan Bao
Author Information
  1. Mengke Zhang: School of Management, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.
  2. Yan Huang: School of Management, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China. ORCID
  3. Yifan Jin: School of Management, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.
  4. Yuan Bao: School of Management, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China.

Abstract

In the innovation ecosystem, the knowledge-based game behavior of each subject not only pertains to its own survival and development but also affects evolution of the innovation ecosystem. The present study investigates the choice of government's regulation strategy, leading firms' innovation protection strategy and following firms' imitation strategy from the perspective of group evolutionary game. Based on the cost-benefit perspective, an asymmetric tripartite evolutionary game model and a simulation model are constructed to analyze the strategies and stability of the evolutionary equilibrium of each subject. We focus mainly on the protection intensity of innovation achievements by leading enterprises and the difficulty of imitation and substitution by following enterprises. The cost of patent operation and maintenance, government subsidies, and the relative difficulty of technology substitution and imitation were identified as the key factors affecting the evolutionary equilibrium of the system. Based on different scenarios resulting from the aforementioned factors, four equilibrium states are observed in the system, namely {no government regulation, technology secrecy, substitution}, {no government regulation, technology secrecy, imitation}, {no government regulation, patent application, imitation}, and {government regulation, patent application, imitation}. Finally, the study suggests corresponding recommendations for the three parties, which can help governments as well as the leading and following firms to choose appropriate behavioral strategies. At the same time, this study offers positive insights to participants in the global innovation ecosystem.

References

  1. Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Aug 26;95(9):098104 [PMID: 16197256]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13391-4 [PMID: 15329411]
  3. Harv Bus Rev. 1993 May-Jun;71(3):75-86 [PMID: 10126156]
  4. Science. 2005 Jul 1;309(5731):93 [PMID: 15994539]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):10952-5 [PMID: 16829575]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 19;105(7):2291-4 [PMID: 18287081]
  7. Nature. 2017 Apr 13;544(7649):227-230 [PMID: 28355181]
  8. J Theor Biol. 2017 Feb 21;415:1-12 [PMID: 27915074]
  9. Nature. 2005 Jan 20;433(7023):312-6 [PMID: 15662424]
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Dec;66(6 Pt 1):062903 [PMID: 12513331]
  11. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52 [PMID: 5875340]
  12. Phys Life Rev. 2014 Dec;11(4):573-86 [PMID: 24613645]
  13. Nature. 2007 Aug 30;448(7157):1046-9 [PMID: 17728757]
  14. Biosystems. 2010 Feb;99(2):109-25 [PMID: 19837129]
  15. Nature. 2004 Nov 25;432(7016):499-502 [PMID: 15565153]

MeSH Term

Humans
Ecosystem
Game Theory
Imitative Behavior
Computer Simulation
Government
China

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0innovationregulationstrategyevolutionarygameleadingfollowingimitationgovernmentecosystemstudyfirms'equilibriumpatenttechnology{noimitation}subjectprotectionperspectiveBasedmodelstrategiesenterprisesdifficultysubstitutionfactorssystemsecrecyapplicationfirmsknowledge-basedbehaviorpertainssurvivaldevelopmentalsoaffectsevolutionpresentinvestigateschoicegovernment'sgroupcost-benefitasymmetrictripartitesimulationconstructedanalyzestabilityfocusmainlyintensityachievementscostoperationmaintenancesubsidiesrelativeidentifiedkeyaffectingdifferentscenariosresultingaforementionedfourstatesobservednamelysubstitution}{governmentFinallysuggestscorrespondingrecommendationsthreepartiescanhelpgovernmentswellchooseappropriatebehavioraltimeofferspositiveinsightsparticipantsglobalGovernmentstrategy:analysisbasedtheory

Similar Articles

Cited By