Efficacy and prognosis of robotic surgery with sentinel node navigation surgery in endometrial cancer.

Shinichi Togami, Mika Fukuda, Mika Mizuno, Shintaro Yanazume, Hiroaki Kobayashi
Author Information
  1. Shinichi Togami: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. ORCID
  2. Mika Fukuda: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. ORCID
  3. Mika Mizuno: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. ORCID
  4. Shintaro Yanazume: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. ORCID
  5. Hiroaki Kobayashi: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan. hirokoba@m2.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery with sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) in endometrial cancer.
METHODS: This study included 130 patients with endometrial cancer, who underwent robotic surgery, including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic SNNS at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Kagoshima University Hospital. Pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified using the uterine cervix 99m Technetium-labeled phytate and indocyanine green injections. Surgery-related and survival outcomes were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The median operative and console times and volume of blood loss were 204 (range: 101-555) minutes, 152 (range: 70-453) minutes, and 20 (range: 2-620) mL, respectively. The bilateral and unilateral pelvic SLN detection rates were 90.0% (117/130) and 5.4% (7/130), respectively, and the identification rate (the rate at which at least one SLN could be identified on either side) was 95% (124/130). Lower extremity lymphedema occurred in only 1 patient (0.8%), and no pelvic lymphocele occurred. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients (2.3%), and the recurrence site was the abdominal cavity, with dissemination in 2 patients and vaginal stump in one. The 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival rates were 97.1% and 98.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery with SNNS for endometrial cancer showed a high SLN identification rate, low occurrence rates of lower extremity lymphedema and pelvic lymphocele, and excellent oncologic outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct;62(10):1363-1371 [PMID: 33547208]
  2. Lancet. 2009 Jan 10;373(9658):125-36 [PMID: 19070889]
  3. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;142(10):2173-83 [PMID: 27217038]
  4. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec;147(3):535-540 [PMID: 29056441]
  5. Int J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec;15(6):531-42 [PMID: 21069552]
  6. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;143(3):313-318 [PMID: 30125949]
  7. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 22;50(11):1261-1264 [PMID: 32607588]
  8. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jun;141(3):440-446 [PMID: 27020700]
  9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1707-16 [PMID: 19033573]
  10. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39 [PMID: 33397713]
  11. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;51(4):584-589 [PMID: 33388755]
  12. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Feb;16(2):170-199 [PMID: 29439178]
  13. Glob Health Med. 2022 Feb 28;4(1):21-25 [PMID: 35291204]
  14. Lancet. 2010 Apr 3;375(9721):1165-72 [PMID: 20188410]
  15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7 [PMID: 27288987]
  16. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;59(3):420-424 [PMID: 32416891]
  17. Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;165(2):347-352 [PMID: 35314086]
  18. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;119(6):1210-8 [PMID: 22617586]
  19. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):234-239 [PMID: 28528918]
  20. Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;109(12):2454-60 [PMID: 17503431]
  21. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):751-7 [PMID: 25723779]
  22. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):469-76 [PMID: 21489874]
  23. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):384-392 [PMID: 28159465]
  24. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec;147(3):528-534 [PMID: 29032824]
  25. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Mar;28(2):e13 [PMID: 27894166]
  26. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec;147(3):549-553 [PMID: 28942993]
  27. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:77-82 [PMID: 35151960]

MeSH Term

Female
Humans
Sentinel Lymph Node
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Lymphocele
Endometrial Neoplasms
Lymph Nodes
Prognosis
Indocyanine Green
Lymphedema
Lymph Node Excision

Chemicals

Indocyanine Green
technetium phytate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0surgeryendometrialcancerpelvicoutcomesroboticsentinelSNNSpatientssurvivalrange:respectivelySLNratesrateoccurredstudyoncologicnodenavigationbilateralidentifiedminutesidentificationoneextremitylymphedemalymphocele23-yearLymphOBJECTIVE:aimedvalidatesurgicalMETHODS:included130underwentincludinghysterectomysalpingo-oophorectomyDepartmentObstetricsGynecologyKagoshimaUniversityHospitalPelviclymphnodesSLNsusinguterinecervix99mTechnetium-labeledphytateindocyaninegreeninjectionsSurgery-relatedalsoevaluatedRESULTS:medianoperativeconsoletimesvolumebloodloss204101-55515270-453202-620mLunilateraldetection900%117/13054%7/130leasteitherside95%124/130Lower1patient08%Recurrence33%recurrencesiteabdominalcavitydisseminationvaginalstumprecurrence-freeoverall971%989%CONCLUSION:RoboticshowedhighlowoccurrencelowerexcellentEfficacyprognosisEndometrialCancerNodesPrognosisSentinelNodeSurgery

Similar Articles

Cited By