Wild vs. Cultivated Diels: Nutritional and Biological Activity Differences.

Jing Yang, Yaochen Li, Yuxin He, Hongying He, Xiaoqi Chen, Tingfu Liu, Biao Zhu
Author Information
  1. Jing Yang: Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China. ORCID
  2. Yaochen Li: Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
  3. Yuxin He: Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
  4. Hongying He: Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
  5. Xiaoqi Chen: Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
  6. Tingfu Liu: Lishui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lishui 323000, China.
  7. Biao Zhu: Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety Control for Subtropical Fruit and Vegetable, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Green Production of Agriculture in Mountainous Areas of Zhejiang Province, College of Horticulture Science, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China. ORCID

Abstract

Compositional, functional, and nutritional properties are important for the use-value assessments of wild and cultivated edible plants. The aim of this study was to compare the nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, volatile compounds, and potential biological activities of cultivated and wild . Various substances, such as soluble sugars, mineral elements, vitamins, total phenolics, total flavonoids, and volatiles, were measured and analyzed using UV spectrophotometry, ICP-OES, HPLC, and GC-MS methods. The antioxidant capacity of a methanol extract of . , as well as the hypoglycemic abilities of its ethanol and water extracts, were tested. The results showed that the contents of soluble sugar, soluble protein, and total saponin in the cultivated samples were higher, while the wild samples contained higher amounts of K, Na, Se, vitamin C, and total amino acids. The cultivated . also showed a higher antioxidant potential, while the wild . exhibited a better hypoglycemic activity. Thirty-three volatile compounds were identified using GC-MS in two plants, with esters and hydrocarbons being the main volatile compounds. This study demonstrated that both cultivated and wild have a good nutritional value and biological activity, and can be used as a source of nutritional supplementation or even in medication.

Keywords

References

  1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;101(5):1805-1817 [PMID: 28105487]
  2. Food Chem. 2017 Jan 1;214:129-136 [PMID: 27507457]
  3. J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Jan 28;63(3):957-62 [PMID: 25526594]
  4. Molecules. 2021 Feb 04;26(4): [PMID: 33557008]
  5. Food Res Int. 2019 Jul;121:714-722 [PMID: 31108800]
  6. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018 May 10;217:220-227 [PMID: 29476961]
  7. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 2021;79:63-150 [PMID: 34865729]
  8. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(8):1621-31 [PMID: 16714304]
  9. Molecules. 2010 Oct 21;15(10):7313-52 [PMID: 20966876]
  10. Drug Deliv. 2017;24(sup1):70-80 [PMID: 29124977]
  11. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Nov;145:111738 [PMID: 32916220]
  12. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2021 Sep;76(3):340-346 [PMID: 34342789]
  13. Molecules. 2020 Oct 27;25(21): [PMID: 33121124]
  14. Food Chem. 2021 Apr 8;357:129752 [PMID: 33915464]
  15. Phytother Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2448-2456 [PMID: 31342604]
  16. Mol Plant. 2012 Mar;5(2):418-29 [PMID: 22207720]
  17. Life Sci. 2021 Dec 1;286:120046 [PMID: 34653428]
  18. Medicines (Basel). 2017 Jul 10;4(3): [PMID: 28930267]
  19. Molecules. 2023 Mar 01;28(5): [PMID: 36903530]
  20. Food Chem. 2016 May 15;199:702-10 [PMID: 26776027]
  21. Heliyon. 2022 Oct 04;8(10):e10838 [PMID: 36247118]
  22. J Food Sci. 2020 Jun;85(6):1856-1871 [PMID: 32476145]
  23. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020 Apr 15;9(4): [PMID: 32326524]
  24. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005 Nov-Dec;7(11-12):1621-9 [PMID: 16356125]
  25. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Feb 1;122:1244-1252 [PMID: 30227201]
  26. Food Chem. 2016 Apr 1;196:776-82 [PMID: 26593554]
  27. Biomolecules. 2019 Nov 14;9(11): [PMID: 31739596]
  28. Food Chem. 2018 Apr 15;245:1196-1203 [PMID: 29287342]
  29. Biomolecules. 2021 Dec 14;11(12): [PMID: 34944521]
  30. Sports Med. 2014 May;44 Suppl 1:S35-45 [PMID: 24791915]
  31. J Chem Ecol. 2022 Aug;48(7-8):660-669 [PMID: 35653012]
  32. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 27;14(23): [PMID: 36501082]
  33. Molecules. 2021 May 24;26(11): [PMID: 34073905]
  34. Hortic Res. 2014 Apr 09;1:14015 [PMID: 26504534]
  35. J Ginseng Res. 2016 Apr;40(2):113-20 [PMID: 27158231]
  36. Food Chem. 2020 Aug 1;320:126646 [PMID: 32229398]
  37. In Vivo. 2013 Nov-Dec;27(6):809-14 [PMID: 24292586]
  38. Nat Prod Res. 2020 Sep;34(18):2621-2625 [PMID: 30908095]
  39. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Dec 19;10(12): [PMID: 34943122]
  40. Molecules. 2021 Jun 13;26(12): [PMID: 34199199]
  41. Food Chem. 2014 Jul 15;155:240-50 [PMID: 24594181]
  42. Pharmaceutics. 2021 May 13;13(5): [PMID: 34068285]
  43. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):313-7 [PMID: 23248565]
  44. J Nat Prod. 2014 Jul 25;77(7):1632-43 [PMID: 24957203]
  45. Foods. 2021 Feb 07;10(2): [PMID: 33562277]
  46. Molecules. 2021 Apr 24;26(9): [PMID: 33923276]
  47. Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Nov;7(11):1456-66 [PMID: 22951402]
  48. Foods. 2019 Oct 06;8(10): [PMID: 31590464]
  49. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 6;30(1):37-45 [PMID: 33552615]

Grants

  1. 2019C02014/Zhejiang Provincial Key R & D Program

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nutritionalwildcultivatedcompoundstotalvolatilebiologicalsolublehigheractivityplantsstudypotentialusingGC-MSantioxidanthypoglycemicshowedsamplesvalueCompositionalfunctionalpropertiesimportantuse-valueassessmentsedibleaimcomparecompositionbioactiveactivitiesVarioussubstancessugarsmineralelementsvitaminsphenolicsflavonoidsvolatilesmeasuredanalyzedUVspectrophotometryICP-OESHPLCmethodscapacitymethanolextractwellabilitiesethanolwaterextractstestedresultscontentssugarproteinsaponincontainedamountsKNaSevitaminCaminoacidsalsoexhibitedbetterThirty-threeidentifiedtwoestershydrocarbonsmaindemonstratedgoodcanusedsourcesupplementationevenmedicationWildvsCultivatedDiels:NutritionalBiologicalActivityDifferencesZingiberstriolatumchemical

Similar Articles

Cited By