Pediatric robotic urologic procedures: Indications and outcomes.

Sean W Hou, Monica H Xing, Mohan S Gundeti
Author Information
  1. Sean W Hou: Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Monica H Xing: Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. Mohan S Gundeti: Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has revolutionized minimally invasive surgery in pediatric urology. The robotic platform allows surgeons to maintain the benefits of laparoscopic surgery while having enhanced three-dimensional view, dexterity, range of motion, and control of high-resolution cameras. In this review, we summarize the indications and recent outcomes for various pediatric urologic RALS procedures to illustrate the current state of robotics in pediatric urology.
Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases. We extrapolated and summarized recent evidence on RALS in pediatric urology patients, with an emphasis on indications and outcomes, with regard to the following procedures and search terms: pyeloplasty, kidney stone surgery, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, ureteral reimplantation, appendico-vesicostomy, augmentation cystoplasty, bladder neck reconstruction, and Malone antegrade continence enema. Additional Medical Subject Headings terms used to augment the search included "Treatment Outcome" and "Robotic Surgical Procedures."
Results: Increasing usage of RALS has shown many benefits in perioperative and postoperative outcomes. In addition, there is growing evidence that robotic procedures in pediatric urology result in similar or better surgical outcomes when compared to the standard of care.
Conclusions: RALS has shown considerable effectiveness in pediatric urologic procedures and may achieve surgical outcomes comparable to the standard approaches of open or laparoscopic surgery. However, larger case series and prospective randomized controlled trials are still necessary to validate the reported outcomes, in addition to cost analyses and studies on the surgical learning curve. We believe that the continuous evolution of robotic platforms will allow for enhanced care and quality of life for pediatric urology patients.

References

  1. J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1870-5 [PMID: 21421223]
  2. J Endourol. 2011 Aug;25(8):1299-305 [PMID: 21774665]
  3. Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):866-878 [PMID: 32868139]
  4. Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 29;7:93 [PMID: 30984718]
  5. Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):438-42 [PMID: 24210571]
  6. Front Pediatr. 2019 Aug 22;7:351 [PMID: 31508400]
  7. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):615-619 [PMID: 30218762]
  8. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Aug;66 Suppl 3:e27867 [PMID: 31136081]
  9. J Endourol. 2022 Apr;36(4):462-467 [PMID: 34931548]
  10. J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1876-81 [PMID: 21421231]
  11. J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1117-1122 [PMID: 34859365]
  12. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2021 Aug;30(4):151083 [PMID: 34412880]
  13. J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Aug;14(4):336.e1-336.e8 [PMID: 29530407]
  14. J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):408.e1-408.e6 [PMID: 27593917]
  15. Urolithiasis. 2021 Dec;49(6):575-583 [PMID: 33993337]
  16. Urology. 2016 Nov;97:172-178 [PMID: 27443464]
  17. J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4 Suppl):1622-6 [PMID: 23410982]
  18. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):192.e1-192.e5 [PMID: 31932240]
  19. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):467-470 [PMID: 29206567]
  20. J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):540.e1-540.e6 [PMID: 29909190]
  21. Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):621-631 [PMID: 34247895]
  22. Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1069-75 [PMID: 26187785]
  23. J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):1088-92 [PMID: 26626215]
  24. Urol Clin North Am. 1999 Aug;26(3):661-72, viii [PMID: 10494296]
  25. J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):386.e1-386.e5 [PMID: 27349147]
  26. Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1144-7; discussion 1147 [PMID: 18804263]
  27. World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):1049-1056 [PMID: 35044490]
  28. J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1555-1561 [PMID: 28130103]
  29. J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):201-206 [PMID: 27766551]
  30. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Dec;16(6):783-789 [PMID: 33023851]
  31. Front Pediatr. 2019 May 07;7:172 [PMID: 31134167]
  32. Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):818-823 [PMID: 27036858]
  33. Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2246 [PMID: 33626232]
  34. J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):772-6 [PMID: 25758609]
  35. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):478-483 [PMID: 33651635]
  36. J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):93-97 [PMID: 32333364]
  37. Urology. 2021 Oct;156:e1-e11 [PMID: 34324913]
  38. J Endourol Case Rep. 2020 Dec 29;6(4):264-267 [PMID: 33457650]
  39. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):823-8; discussion 828-9 [PMID: 19110277]
  40. Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jul 24;20(9):50 [PMID: 31342172]
  41. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Mar;97(2):109-14 [PMID: 25723686]
  42. Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):314-321 [PMID: 32167694]
  43. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):139.e1-5 [PMID: 26052000]
  44. Urol Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;42(1):111-20 [PMID: 25455177]
  45. BJU Int. 2014 Oct;114(4):582-94 [PMID: 25383399]
  46. Front Pediatr. 2022 May 24;10:908554 [PMID: 35685916]
  47. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60 [PMID: 27238616]
  48. Urology. 2019 Mar;125:196-201 [PMID: 30476504]
  49. Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Aug;7(4):545-557 [PMID: 30211045]
  50. Int J Urol. 2017 Dec;24(12):855-860 [PMID: 29027269]
  51. J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):1100-4 [PMID: 20650479]
  52. J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Jun;14(3):262.e1-262.e6 [PMID: 29503220]
  53. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Mar;35(3):391-396 [PMID: 30643964]
  54. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):159-166 [PMID: 30592689]
  55. Urol Ann. 2020 Jan-Mar;12(1):19-24 [PMID: 32015612]
  56. World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3035-3046 [PMID: 31511969]
  57. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):380-5 [PMID: 24268880]
  58. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012 Apr;27(4):551-61 [PMID: 21695451]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pediatricoutcomessurgeryRALSurologyroboticprocedureslaparoscopicurologicsurgicalbenefitsenhancedindicationsrecentevidencepatientssearchshownadditionstandardcareIntroduction:Robotic-assistedrevolutionizedminimallyinvasiveplatformallowssurgeonsmaintainthree-dimensionalviewdexterityrangemotioncontrolhigh-resolutioncamerasreviewsummarizevariousillustratecurrentstateroboticsMethods:systematicallysearchedPubMedEMBASEdatabasesextrapolatedsummarizedemphasisregardfollowingterms:pyeloplastykidneystonepartialnephrectomynephroureterectomyureteralreimplantationappendico-vesicostomyaugmentationcystoplastybladderneckreconstructionMaloneantegradecontinenceenemaAdditionalMedicalSubjectHeadingstermsusedaugmentincluded"TreatmentOutcome""RoboticSurgicalProcedures"Results:IncreasingusagemanyperioperativepostoperativegrowingresultsimilarbettercomparedConclusions:considerableeffectivenessmayachievecomparableapproachesopenHoweverlargercaseseriesprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrialsstillnecessaryvalidatereportedcostanalysesstudieslearningcurvebelievecontinuousevolutionplatformswillallowqualitylifePediatricprocedures:Indications

Similar Articles

Cited By