Cost-effectiveness of an in-development adult-formulated pneumococcal vaccine in older US adults.

Angela R Wateska, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Chyongchiou J Lin, Lee H Harrison, William Schaffner, Richard K Zimmerman, Kenneth J Smith
Author Information
  1. Angela R Wateska: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: arw74@pitt.edu.
  2. Mary Patricia Nowalk: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: tnowalk@pitt.edu.
  3. Chyongchiou J Lin: The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, United States. Electronic address: lin.3782@osu.edu.
  4. Lee H Harrison: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: lharriso@edc.pitt.edu.
  5. William Schaffner: Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States. Electronic address: william.schaffner@vumc.org.
  6. Richard K Zimmerman: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: zimmer@pitt.edu.
  7. Kenneth J Smith: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: smithkj2@upmc.edu.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: CDC pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for older adults now include either 15- or 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15/PCV20). However, an in-development 21-valent vaccine (PCV21), formulated based on adult pneumococcal disease epidemiology, could substantially increase coverage of disease-causing pneumococcal serotypes, particularly in Black older adults, who are at greater risk. The potential public health impact and cost-effectiveness of PCV21 compared to currently recommended vaccines in older adults is unclear.
METHODS: A Markov decision model compared current pneumococcal vaccination recommendations to PCV21 use in Black and non-Black 65-year-old cohorts. CDC Active Bacterial Core surveillance data informed population and serotype-specific pneumococcal disease risk. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using Delphi panel estimates and clinical trial data, with variation in sensitivity analyses. Potential indirect effects on adult disease from PCV15 childhood vaccination were examined. All model parameters were varied individually and collectively in sensitivity analyses. Scenarios with decreased PCV21 effectiveness and potential COVID-19 pandemic effects were also examined.
RESULTS: In the Black cohort, the PCV21 strategy cost $88,478 per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained without and $97,952/QALY with childhood PCV15 indirect effects. PCV21 in the non-Black cohort cost $127,436/QALY gained without and $141,358/QALY with childhood PCV15 effects. Current recommendation strategies were economically unfavorable, regardless of population or indirect childhood vaccination effects. Results favoring PCV21 use were robust in sensitivity analyses and alternative scenarios.
CONCLUSION: An in-development PCV21 vaccine would likely be economically and clinically favorable compared to currently recommended pneumococcal vaccines in older adults. While PCV21 was more favorable in Black cohort analyses, results for both Black and non-Black populations were economically reasonable, highlighting the potential importance of adult-specific pneumococcal vaccine formulations and, pending further investigation, potentially justifying a future general population recommendation for PCV21 use in older adults.

References

  1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 May 14;70(3):1-26 [PMID: 33983910]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 19;372(12):1114-25 [PMID: 25785969]
  3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1271-1278 [PMID: 32086950]
  4. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):208 [PMID: 28292280]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 1;72(5):e65-e75 [PMID: 33196783]
  6. Public Health Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;125(1):44-51 [PMID: 20402195]
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):901-8 [PMID: 26976292]
  8. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 28;71(4):109-117 [PMID: 35085226]
  9. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 17;138(12):960-8 [PMID: 12809452]
  10. Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jul;61(1):28-36 [PMID: 34148625]
  11. Med Care. 1998 Jun;36(6):778-92 [PMID: 9630120]
  12. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Apr;65(4):763-768 [PMID: 28024090]
  13. JAMA. 1999 Jan 20;281(3):243-8 [PMID: 9918479]
  14. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Nov 22;68(46):1069-1075 [PMID: 31751323]
  15. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60273 [PMID: 23565216]
  16. Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1683-1693 [PMID: 35831685]

Grants

  1. R01 AI116575/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Adult
Middle Aged
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Pandemics
COVID-19
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Pneumococcal Infections
Vaccination
Vaccines, Conjugate

Chemicals

Pneumococcal Vaccines
Vaccines, Conjugate

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PCV21pneumococcalolderadultsvaccineBlackeffectsvaccinationanalyseschildhoodin-developmentdiseasepotentialcomparedusenon-BlackpopulationsensitivityindirectPCV15cohorteconomicallyCDCrecommendationsadultriskcurrentlyrecommendedvaccinesmodeldataeffectivenessexaminedcostgainedwithoutrecommendationfavorableINTRODUCTION:nowincludeeither15-20-valentconjugatePCV15/PCV20However21-valentformulatedbasedepidemiologysubstantiallyincreasecoveragedisease-causingserotypesparticularlygreaterpublichealthimpactcost-effectivenessunclearMETHODS:Markovdecisioncurrent65-year-oldcohortsActiveBacterialCoresurveillanceinformedserotype-specificVaccineestimatedusingDelphipanelestimatesclinicaltrialvariationPotentialparametersvariedindividuallycollectivelyScenariosdecreasedCOVID-19pandemicalsoRESULTS:strategy$88478perqualityadjustedlife-yearQALY$97952/QALY$127436/QALY$141358/QALYCurrentstrategiesunfavorableregardlessResultsfavoringrobustalternativescenariosCONCLUSION:likelyclinicallyresultspopulationsreasonablehighlightingimportanceadult-specificformulationspendinginvestigationpotentiallyjustifyingfuturegeneralCost-effectivenessadult-formulatedUS

Similar Articles

Cited By