Female reproductive fluid attracts more and better sperm: implications for within-ejaculate cryptic female choice.

Silvia Cattelan, Alessandro Devigili, Maria Santacà, Clelia Gasparini
Author Information
  1. Silvia Cattelan: Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.
  2. Alessandro Devigili: Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy. ORCID
  3. Maria Santacà: Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy. ORCID
  4. Clelia Gasparini: Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Mounting evidence shows that the female reproductive fluid (FRF) can differently affect sperm performance of different males by biasing paternity share among competing males. Here, we tested for the first time the potential of 'within-ejaculate cryptic female choice' mediated by the FRF in the zebrafish (). Using a recently developed sperm selection chamber, we separated and collected FRF-selected from non-selected sperm to compare the two subpopulations of sperm in terms of sperm number, viability, DNA integrity and fertilizing ability. We showed that the sperm attracted by FRF are more numerous, more viable and with higher DNA integrity. In addition, FRF-selected sperm fertilized more eggs, but if this is due to fertilization ability or numerical advantage remains to be tested. Our results suggest that FRF can select sperm with a better phenotype, highlighting the crucial and impactful role that FRF might play in the process of fertilization and post-mating sexual selection dynamics, along with the potential implications for sperm selection in assisted reproductive techniques.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.crjdfn38v

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 17;11(1):16689 [PMID: 34404815]
  2. Cells. 2021 Sep 18;10(9): [PMID: 34572122]
  3. Am Nat. 2023 Mar;201(3):491-499 [PMID: 36848512]
  4. J Evol Biol. 2022 Nov;35(11):1407-1413 [PMID: 35988118]
  5. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1997 Jun;6(2):84-7 [PMID: 9200834]
  6. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 7;375(1813):20200077 [PMID: 33070736]
  7. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 16;281(1784):20140148 [PMID: 24741014]
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 7;375(1813):20200066 [PMID: 33070737]
  9. Evol Lett. 2019 Feb 14;3(2):198-206 [PMID: 31289692]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):8053-8058 [PMID: 28698378]
  11. Ecol Lett. 2015 Sep;18(9):937-43 [PMID: 26154782]
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2495-501 [PMID: 21227973]

MeSH Term

Animals
Male
Female
Zebrafish
Semen
Reproduction
Spermatozoa
Fertilization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0spermFRFselectionfemalereproductivefluidDNAintegritycanmalestestedpotentialcrypticFRF-selectedabilityfertilizationbetterimplicationsMountingevidenceshowsdifferentlyaffectperformancedifferentbiasingpaternityshareamongcompetingfirsttime'within-ejaculatechoice'mediatedzebrafishUsingrecentlydevelopedchamberseparatedcollectednon-selectedcomparetwosubpopulationstermsnumberviabilityfertilizingshowedattractednumerousviablehigheradditionfertilizedeggsduenumericaladvantageremainsresultssuggestselectphenotypehighlightingcrucialimpactfulrolemightplayprocesspost-matingsexualdynamicsalongassistedtechniquesFemaleattractssperm:within-ejaculatechoiceDaniorerioovarianattractionquality

Similar Articles

Cited By