[Working poverty and self-rated health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study over time using 1995-2021 Socioeconomic Panel data].

Timo-Kolja Pförtner, Ibrahim Demirer
Author Information
  1. Timo-Kolja Pförtner: Arbeitsbereich Forschungsmethoden, Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland. Timo-kolja.pfoertner@uk-koeln.de.
  2. Ibrahim Demirer: Institut für Medizinsoziologie, Versorgungsforschung und Rehabilitationswissenschaft, Medizinische und Humanwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The working poor are considered a vulnerable group. This study examines whether health disparities between working-poor and non-working-poor workers have worsened in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic by comparing them over time with earlier periods of economic crisis and social and labor market policy reform.
METHODS: The analyses are based on the Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP, 1995-2020) and the Special Survey on Socioeconomic Factors and Consequences of the Spread of Coronavirus in Germany (SOEP-CoV, 2020-2021). All employed persons aged 18-67 years were considered for the analyses to calculate the risks of poor subjective health due to working poverty using pooled logistic regression by sex.
RESULTS: Subjective health improved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Differences in health between the working poor and those who were not working poor remained relatively constant between 1995 and 2021. Individuals who were more likely to be in working poverty over time had the highest risk of inadequate health. The health disparities associated with the frequency of working poverty increased over time and peaked for both sexes in the pandemic. Significant sex differences were not identified.
DISCUSSION: This study illustrates the social embeddedness of working poverty as a determinant of poor health. In particular, those who were more likely to experience working poverty during their working lives are considered to be particularly vulnerable to inadequate health. Tendentially, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to reinforce this gradient in health.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:229-53 [PMID: 24641559]
  2. Int J Health Serv. 2017 Apr;47(2):189-206 [PMID: 27913757]
  3. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Nov;73(11):1002-1011 [PMID: 31515261]
  4. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:324-31 [PMID: 26623942]
  5. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 1996;58:i-xiii, 1-161 [PMID: 8857196]
  6. Int J Public Health. 2011 Aug;56(4):373-84 [PMID: 20495993]
  7. Am J Ind Med. 2012 Feb;55(2):93-106 [PMID: 22161778]
  8. Am Sociol Rev. 2021 Jun;86(3):465-502 [PMID: 34149053]
  9. Am J Ind Med. 2014 May;57(5):495-515 [PMID: 23074099]
  10. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 8;8(6):e019755 [PMID: 29884694]
  11. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115156 [PMID: 35728461]
  12. Eur J Public Health. 2003 Sep;13(3 Suppl):6-14 [PMID: 14533742]
  13. Int J Public Health. 2022 May 11;67:1604555 [PMID: 35645704]
  14. BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e060710 [PMID: 35379647]
  15. Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:10-9 [PMID: 24607705]
  16. J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Sep;63(3):357-374 [PMID: 35012360]
  17. Eur J Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;31(Supplement_4):iv40-iv49 [PMID: 34751369]
  18. Health Promot Int. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):181-186 [PMID: 32297931]
  19. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012 Jun;55(6-7):767-74 [PMID: 22736154]
  20. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Dec 11;117(50):861-867 [PMID: 33295275]
  21. Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023 Jul;53(3):266-281 [PMID: 36444760]
  22. Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 15;185(4):274-282 [PMID: 28137773]
  23. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2020 Aug;68:100508 [PMID: 32834344]

MeSH Term

Humans
COVID-19
Pandemics
Germany
Working Poor
Male
Female
Adolescent
Young Adult
Adult
Middle Aged
Aged
Poverty
Social Determinants of Health
Health Status

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthworkingpovertypoorCOVID-19pandemictimeconsideredstudySocioeconomicdisparitiessocialanalysesPanelSOEPusingsexlikelyinadequateBACKGROUND:a vulnerablegroupexamineswhetherworking-poornon-working-poorworkersworsenedwakecomparingearlierperiodseconomiccrisislabormarketpolicyreformMETHODS:based1995-2020SpecialSurveyFactorsConsequencesSpreadCoronavirusGermanySOEP-CoV2020-2021employedpersonsaged18-67 yearscalculateriskssubjectiveduepooledlogisticregressionRESULTS:SubjectiveimprovedDifferencesremainedrelativelyconstant19952021IndividualshighestriskassociatedfrequencyincreasedpeakedsexesSignificantdifferencesidentifiedDISCUSSION:illustratesembeddednessa determinantparticularexperiencelivesparticularlyvulnerableTendentiallyappearsreinforcegradient[Workingself-ratedpandemic:a comparative1995-2021data]PrecariousemploymentSelf-ratedTrendWorking

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)