Stagnation arising through intermittent usage is associated with increased viable but non culturable and amoeba hosts in a hospital water system.

Muhammad Atif Nisar, Kirstin E Ros, Melissa H Brown, Richard Bentham, Giles Best, James Xi, Jason Hinds, Harriet Whiley
Author Information
  1. Muhammad Atif Nisar: College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  2. Kirstin E Ros: College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  3. Melissa H Brown: College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  4. Richard Bentham: College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  5. Giles Best: College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  6. James Xi: Enware Australia Pty Ltd., Caringbah, NSW, Australia.
  7. Jason Hinds: Enware Australia Pty Ltd., Caringbah, NSW, Australia.
  8. Harriet Whiley: College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.

Abstract

Hospital Water systems are a significant source of , resulting in the potentially fatal Legionnaires' disease. One of the biggest challenges for management within these systems is that under unfavorable conditions transforms itself into a viable but non culturable (VBNC) state that cannot be detected using the standard methods. This study used a novel method (flow cytometry-cell sorting and qPCR [VFC+qPCR] assay) concurrently with the standard detection methods to examine the effect of temporary Water stagnation, on spp. and microbial communities present in a hospital Water system. Water samples were also analyzed for amoebae using culture and and specific qPCR. The Water temperature, number and duration of Water flow events for the hand basins and showers sampled was measured using the Enware Smart Flow monitoring system. qPCR analysis demonstrated that 21.8% samples were positive for spp., 21% for , 40.9% for and 4.2% for . All samples that were spp. positive using qPCR (22%) were also positive for VBNC spp. however, only 2.5% of samples were positive for culturable spp. 18.1% of the samples were positive for free-living amoebae (FLA) using culture. All samples positive for spp. were also positive for FLA. Samples with a high heterotrophic plate count (HPC ≥ 5 × 10 CFU/L) were also significantly associated with high concentrations of spp. DNA, VBNC spp./ ( < 0.01) and ( < 0.05). Temporary Water stagnation arising through intermittent usage (< 2 hours of usage per month) significantly ( < 0.01) increased the amount of spp. DNA, VBNC spp./, and however, it did not significantly impact the HPC load. In contrast to stagnation, no relationship was observed between the microbes and Water temperature. In conclusion, spp. (DNA and VBNC) was associated with , heterotrophic bacteria, and stagnation occurring through intermittent usage. This is the first study to monitor VBNC spp. within a hospital Water system. The high percentage of false negative spp. results provided by the culture method supports the use of either qPCR or VFC+qPCR to monitor spp. contamination within hospital Water systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Water Res. 2013 Dec 1;47(19):6958-65 [PMID: 24200009]
  2. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;25(12):1072-6 [PMID: 15636295]
  3. Water Res. 2022 Nov 1;226:119238 [PMID: 36270142]
  4. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(2):195-201 [PMID: 26094507]
  5. Parasitol Res. 2016 Sep;115(9):3365-74 [PMID: 27177720]
  6. Microorganisms. 2021 Dec 09;9(12): [PMID: 34946143]
  7. Int J Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;12(4):416-20 [PMID: 18243750]
  8. Pathogens. 2019 Feb 26;8(1): [PMID: 30813532]
  9. Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 15;6:24322 [PMID: 27079173]
  10. Water Res. 2016 Sep 1;100:382-392 [PMID: 27219048]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 13;16(8): [PMID: 31013887]
  12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Apr;74(7):2187-99 [PMID: 18245233]
  13. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;28(7):818-24 [PMID: 17564984]
  14. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195635 [PMID: 29649274]
  15. Water Res. 2016 Apr 15;93:276-288 [PMID: 26928563]
  16. J Infect Chemother. 2020 May;26(5):411-417 [PMID: 32081644]
  17. Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Oct 31;14(11):21660-75 [PMID: 24185913]
  18. mBio. 2018 Oct 9;9(5): [PMID: 30301851]
  19. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Oct;44(10):3589-95 [PMID: 17021087]
  20. Lancet. 2016 Jan 23;387(10016):376-385 [PMID: 26231463]
  21. J Hosp Infect. 2018 Jan;98(1):60-63 [PMID: 28890285]
  22. Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Sep;43:108-22 [PMID: 27180896]
  23. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Nov 30;7:477 [PMID: 29250488]
  24. Pathogens. 2020 Apr 15;9(4): [PMID: 32326561]
  25. Infect Immun. 2000 May;68(5):2939-47 [PMID: 10768992]
  26. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jan 4;87(2): [PMID: 33158887]
  27. Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 30;14:1094877 [PMID: 36793878]
  28. Biofouling. 2010;26(2):129-39 [PMID: 19859848]
  29. Parasit Vectors. 2016 Oct 10;9(1):539 [PMID: 27724947]
  30. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 24;16(15): [PMID: 31344972]
  31. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):241-7 [PMID: 15145582]
  32. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199429 [PMID: 29928013]
  33. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2244-9 [PMID: 15870307]
  34. Front Environ Sci. 2021 Nov 10;9:1-22 [PMID: 35004706]
  35. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002 Jul;15(3):506-26 [PMID: 12097254]
  36. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(51):76532-76542 [PMID: 36161570]
  37. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):5750-6 [PMID: 16957190]
  38. Water Res. 2016 Mar 1;90:71-78 [PMID: 26724441]
  39. Water Res. 2018 Sep 15;141:428-438 [PMID: 29409685]
  40. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;71(4):2053-60 [PMID: 15812038]
  41. Front Microbiol. 2017 Jul 19;8:1330 [PMID: 28769899]
  42. Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Sep 1;188(9):1686-1694 [PMID: 31225857]

MeSH Term

Legionella
Amoeba
Water
Legionella pneumophila
Acanthamoeba
DNA
Hospitals
Water Microbiology

Chemicals

Water
DNA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sppwaterpositiveVBNCsamplesusingqPCRsystemsstagnationhospitalsystemalso<usagewithinculturableamoebaeculturehighsignificantlyassociatedDNA0intermittentdiseaseviablenonstandardmethodsstudymethodflowtemperaturehowever2free-livingFLAheterotrophicHPC/01arisingincreasedmonitorHospitalsignificantsourceresultingpotentiallyfatalLegionnaires'Onebiggestchallengesmanagementunfavorableconditionstransformsstatedetectedusednovelcytometry-cellsorting[VFC+qPCR]assayconcurrentlydetectionexamineeffecttemporarymicrobialcommunitiespresentWateranalyzedspecificnumberdurationeventshandbasinsshowerssampledmeasuredEnwareSmartFlowmonitoringanalysisdemonstrated218%21%409%42%22%5%181%Samplesplatecount5×10CFU/Lconcentrations05TemporaryhourspermonthamountimpactloadcontrastrelationshipobservedmicrobesconclusionbacteriaoccurringfirstpercentagefalsenegativeresultsprovidedsupportsuseeitherVFC+qPCRcontaminationStagnationamoebahostsLegionnaires’buildingplumbingpotablesafetyplan

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)