Resistance training rejuvenates aging skin by reducing circulating inflammatory factors and enhancing dermal extracellular matrices.

Shu Nishikori, Jun Yasuda, Kao Murata, Junya Takegaki, Yasuko Harada, Yuki Shirai, Satoshi Fujita
Author Information
  1. Shu Nishikori: Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Japan.
  2. Jun Yasuda: Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Japan.
  3. Kao Murata: Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Japan.
  4. Junya Takegaki: Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Japan.
  5. Yasuko Harada: Frontier Research Center, POLA Chemical Industries, Inc., 560 Kashio-cho, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
  6. Yuki Shirai: Frontier Research Center, POLA Chemical Industries, Inc., 560 Kashio-cho, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
  7. Satoshi Fujita: Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Japan. safujita@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp.

Abstract

Aerobic training (AT) is suggested to be an effective anti-aging strategy for skin aging. However, the respective effects of resistance training (RT) have not been studied. Therefore, we compared the effects of AT and RT on skin aging in a 16-week intervention in 61 healthy sedentary middle-aged Japanese women. Data from 56 women were available for analysis. Both interventions significantly improved skin elasticity and upper dermal structure, and RT also improved dermal thickness. After the training intervention, expression of dermal extracellular matrix-related genes was increased in normal human primary dermal fibroblasts. AT and RT had different effects on circulating levels of factors, such as cytokines, hormones in serum, and metabolites, and RT increased dermal biglycan (BGN). To our knowledge, this is the first report to show different effects of AT and RT on skin aging and identify the key factors involved in RT-induced skin rejuvenation.

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.22216876

References

  1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Apr 23;74(5):720-725 [PMID: 29846512]
  2. Bone. 2015 Nov;80:115-125 [PMID: 26453501]
  3. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016 Jun;75:188-95 [PMID: 26643610]
  4. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2015 Jun;26(3):311-27 [PMID: 25498524]
  5. Science. 2020 Jul 10;369(6500):167-173 [PMID: 32646997]
  6. J Dermatol Sci. 2016 Sep;83(3):174-81 [PMID: 27378089]
  7. Science. 1999 Jan 1;283(5398):83-7 [PMID: 9872747]
  8. Sports Med. 2019 Feb;49(2):233-254 [PMID: 30341595]
  9. Dermatology. 2000;200(4):303-7 [PMID: 10894960]
  10. Eur J Med Res. 2018 Jan 16;23(1):4 [PMID: 29338773]
  11. Biomaterials. 2011 Nov;32(31):7932-40 [PMID: 21820735]
  12. J Dermatol Sci. 2017 Mar;85(3):152-161 [PMID: 27720464]
  13. JCI Insight. 2017 Sep 7;2(17): [PMID: 28878131]
  14. Brain Behav Immun. 2019 Jan;75:181-191 [PMID: 30394312]
  15. Life Sci. 2017 Feb 1;170:33-40 [PMID: 27888112]
  16. Afr Health Sci. 2019 Dec;19(4):2874-2880 [PMID: 32127863]
  17. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2019;16(4):316-332 [PMID: 30819077]
  18. Matrix Biol Plus. 2020 Jun 17;8:100041 [PMID: 33543036]
  19. Nutrition. 2022 May;97:111607 [PMID: 35231855]
  20. J Cell Physiol. 2017 Nov;232(11):2996-3005 [PMID: 28387445]
  21. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 May;20(5):585-93 [PMID: 25311366]
  22. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Jul;17(7):1180-9 [PMID: 12102052]
  23. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jul;34 Suppl 4:4-25 [PMID: 32677068]
  24. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;314(3):R366-R376 [PMID: 29092860]
  25. Skin Res Technol. 2001 Aug;7(3):204-7 [PMID: 11554708]
  26. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Feb 7;21(2):8 [PMID: 30729328]
  27. Skin Res Technol. 2004 Feb;10(1):57-63 [PMID: 14731250]
  28. Skin Res Technol. 2010 Aug;16(3):311-5 [PMID: 20637000]
  29. Gerontology. 1990;36(1):28-35 [PMID: 2384222]
  30. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 May-Jun;20(3):301-8 [PMID: 12102465]
  31. Nat Metab. 2020 Apr;2(4):307-317 [PMID: 32601609]
  32. Skin Res Technol. 2008 Aug;14(3):354-8 [PMID: 19159383]
  33. J Nutr. 2020 Jul 1;150(7):1845-1851 [PMID: 32321161]
  34. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Apr;98(4):1154-62 [PMID: 15772055]
  35. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017 Nov 1;7(11): [PMID: 28389517]
  36. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Feb;19(1):e238-42 [PMID: 22650601]
  37. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Dec;1(6):244-248 [PMID: 24527313]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3017-22 [PMID: 21282661]
  39. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2022 Dec 1;323(6):C1757-C1776 [PMID: 36317800]
  40. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 30;370(5):433-43 [PMID: 24350901]
  41. Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 05;12:625950 [PMID: 33613317]
  42. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Nov;131(5):641-8 [PMID: 7999594]
  43. Endocr Rev. 2000 Oct;21(5):457-87 [PMID: 11041445]
  44. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 07;20(11): [PMID: 31181682]
  45. Biorheology. 1994 Jan-Feb;31(1):21-36 [PMID: 8173042]
  46. NPJ Aging Mech Dis. 2020 Mar 6;6:4 [PMID: 32194977]
  47. Aging Cell. 2015 Aug;14(4):625-34 [PMID: 25902870]
  48. Sports Med. 2014 Feb;44(2):211-21 [PMID: 24174305]

MeSH Term

Middle Aged
Humans
Female
Skin Aging
Resistance Training
Skin
Extracellular Matrix
Aging
Fibroblasts

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0skinRTdermaltrainingATagingeffectsfactorsinterventionwomenimprovedextracellularincreaseddifferentcirculatingAerobicsuggestedeffectiveanti-agingstrategyHoweverrespectiveresistancestudiedThereforecompared16-week61healthysedentarymiddle-agedJapaneseData56availableanalysisinterventionssignificantlyelasticityupperstructurealsothicknessexpressionmatrix-relatedgenesnormalhumanprimaryfibroblastslevelscytokineshormonesserummetabolitesbiglycanBGNknowledgefirstreportshowidentifykeyinvolvedRT-inducedrejuvenationResistancerejuvenatesreducinginflammatoryenhancingmatrices

Similar Articles

Cited By