Attitudes and understanding of premium intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a public health sector patient survey.

Ashmal Jameel, Lucia Dong, Chun Fung Jeffrey Lam, Hana Mahmood, Khayam Naderi, Sancy Low, Elodie Azan, Seema Verma, Scott Robbie, Mani Bhogal, David O'Brart
Author Information
  1. Ashmal Jameel: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  2. Lucia Dong: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  3. Chun Fung Jeffrey Lam: GKT Medical School, Guy's Campus, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
  4. Hana Mahmood: Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Turner Street, London, E1 2AD, UK. ORCID
  5. Khayam Naderi: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  6. Sancy Low: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  7. Elodie Azan: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  8. Seema Verma: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  9. Scott Robbie: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. ORCID
  10. Mani Bhogal: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
  11. David O'Brart: Ophthalmology Dept, Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. david.obrart@gstt.nhs.uk.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patient understanding of, and attitudes to, premium (toric, extended depth of focus/multifocal) intraocular lenses (premIOLs) in public health sector patients undergoing cataract surgery (CS) in the UK.
METHODS: A 12 question survey with Likert scale questions was designed, to assess patient attitudes to post-operative spectacle dependence, refractive target and desirability of spectacle independence whilst considering possible complications of dysphotopsias and need for premIOL exchange/adjustment.
RESULTS: 360 surveys were collected. CS had not been performed in 66.5%. Separate spectacles were worn for reading and distance in 28.8%, 19.2% had varifocals, 11.2% bifocals, 22.9% reading glasses only and 1.6% computer glasses only. Contact lenses were not worn in 95.7%. Only 41.6% were drivers. Most patients (85.8%) did not mind wearing glasses after CS, with 78.9% preferring reading glasses, compared with 29.7% preferring distance glasses. Most patients (75.3%) were not familiar with premIOLs, with 58.9% not willing to consider them in the context of a 2% risk of debilitating dysphotopsia and 54.2% rejecting a 5% risk of second surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of awareness of premIOLs in public health sector (NHS) patients in the UK, suggesting limitations in the "fully informed" consent process for CS. Most NHS CS patients are currently willing to wear spectacles after CS, especially reading glasses. There is reluctance in such patients to consider premIOLs on a background of small risks of debilitating dysphotopsias and increased risks of a second operation.

References

  1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;180:165-177 [PMID: 28647461]
  2. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;100(2):258-62 [PMID: 26089214]
  3. Eye (Lond). 2015 Apr;29(4):552-60 [PMID: 25679413]
  4. Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1736-44 [PMID: 23664469]
  5. J Refract Surg. 2011 Mar;27(3):165-71 [PMID: 20873707]
  6. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;36(9):1479-85 [PMID: 20692558]
  7. Br J Nurs. 2009 Oct 22-Nov 11;18(19):1207-11 [PMID: 19966749]
  8. Eye (Lond). 2005 Mar;19(3):264-8 [PMID: 15286671]
  9. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;122(12):1788-92 [PMID: 15596581]
  10. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1378-1382 [PMID: 31438152]
  11. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Mar;40(3):354-61 [PMID: 24440102]
  12. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;88(3):331-2 [PMID: 14977762]
  13. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;37(10):1751-5 [PMID: 21840163]
  14. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):741-7 [PMID: 24684966]
  15. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep - Oct;64(5):647-658 [PMID: 30849425]
  16. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Oct;36(10):1700-8 [PMID: 20870116]
  17. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):451-8 [PMID: 19251137]
  18. Br J Nurs. 2007 Jan 11-24;16(1):27-32 [PMID: 17353832]
  19. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):70-5 [PMID: 19101427]

MeSH Term

Humans
Public Health
Visual Acuity
Cataract Extraction
Lenses, Intraocular
Cataract

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsCSglassespremIOLsreading2%patientlensespublichealthsector9%understandingattitudespremiumintraocularcataractsurgeryUKsurveyspectacledysphotopsias5%spectaclesworndistance8%6%7%preferringwillingconsiderriskdebilitatingsecondNHSrisksOBJECTIVES:investigatetoricextendeddepthfocus/multifocalundergoingMETHODS:12questionLikertscalequestionsdesignedassesspost-operativedependencerefractivetargetdesirabilityindependencewhilstconsideringpossiblecomplicationsneedpremIOLexchange/adjustmentRESULTS:360surveyscollectedperformed66Separate2819varifocals11bifocals221computerContact9541drivers85mindwearing78compared29753%familiar58contextdysphotopsia54rejectingCONCLUSIONS:lackawarenesssuggestinglimitations"fullyinformed"consentprocesscurrentlywearespeciallyreluctancebackgroundsmallincreasedoperationAttitudessurgery:

Similar Articles

Cited By