The impact of financial tools in environmental degradation management: the relationship between Co emission and ESG funds.

G��lfen Tuna, Kaan T��rkay, Saim Saner ��iftyildiz, H��lya ��elik
Author Information
  1. G��lfen Tuna: Department of Business, Sakarya Business School, Sakarya University, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya Turkey. ORCID
  2. Kaan T��rkay: Department of Business, Graduate School of Business, Sakarya University, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya Turkey.
  3. Saim Saner ��iftyildiz: Department of Foreign Trade, Pamukova Vocational School, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, Pamukova, Sakarya Turkey.
  4. H��lya ��elik: Department of Turkish and Social Sciences Education, Faculty of Education, Sakarya University, Hendek, Sakarya Turkey.

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether ESG funds can be used as an effective tool for environmental sustainability. ESG funds, which first appeared in the 2000s and were exported by environmentally friendly companies, are among the most effective tools for increasing firm value and managing environmental degradation. The causality relationship between the ESG funds, one of the environmentally friendly investment instruments, and the CO emission values, which are used as an environmental degradation criterion, was investigated in this study. The study used 209 daily data sets from July 31, 2020, to May 28, 2021. The symmetric developed by Hacker and Hatemi-J (Appl Econ 38:1489-1500, 2006), the asymmetric developed by Hatemi-J (Empir Econ 43:447-456, 2012), and time-varying asymmetric causality tests were used as models. According to the study results, while there is no symmetric causality between CO emissions and ESG funds, there is causality between CO emissions and ESG funds prices for negative shocks and between CO emissions and ESG funds trade volume for positive shocks. The results of a time-varying asymmetric causality test also support that this causality relationship varies by period. As a result, ESG funds can be used as a strategic financial tool to improve environmental quality during the COVID-19 period; however, this may vary for different sub-sample periods.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 15;830:154662 [PMID: 35318060]
  2. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Apr;25(10):9579-9592 [PMID: 29357077]
  3. J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112581 [PMID: 33866086]
  4. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Apr 10;816:151503 [PMID: 34752864]
  5. Resour Policy. 2022 Jun;76:102637 [PMID: 35261428]
  6. Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101870 [PMID: 36569646]
  7. Br J Sociol. 2020 Mar;71(2):269-283 [PMID: 31950493]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ESGfundscausalityusedenvironmentalstudydegradationCOrelationshipemissionasymmetricemissionscaneffectivetoolenvironmentallyfriendlytoolssymmetricdevelopedHatemi-JEcontime-varyingresultsshocksperiodfinancialaimsdeterminewhethersustainabilityfirstappeared2000sexportedcompaniesamongincreasingfirmvaluemanagingoneinvestmentinstrumentsvaluescriterioninvestigated209dailydatasetsJuly312020May282021HackerAppl38:1489-15002006Empir43:447-4562012testsmodelsAccordingpricesnegativetradevolumepositivetestalsosupportvariesresultstrategicimprovequalityCOVID-19howevermayvarydifferentsub-sampleperiodsimpactmanagement:CoCO2EnvironmentalSustainablefinance

Similar Articles

Cited By