Utilizing the theory of planned behavior to predict COVID-19 vaccination intention: A structural equational modeling approach.

Huy Nhuong Bui, Cong Doanh Duong, Van Quang Nguyen, Ngoc Xuan Vu, Son Tung Ha, Trung Thanh Le, Trong Nghia Vu
Author Information
  1. Huy Nhuong Bui: National Economics University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  2. Cong Doanh Duong: National Economics University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  3. Van Quang Nguyen: College of Economics, Technology and Fisheries, Viet Nam.
  4. Ngoc Xuan Vu: National Economics University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  5. Son Tung Ha: National Economics University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  6. Trung Thanh Le: National Economics University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
  7. Trong Nghia Vu: National Economics University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.

Abstract

It is essential to achieve herd immunity in order to control the COVID-19 pandemic, and this requires a high level of vaccination rate. Despite the importance of vaccination, hesitancy and unwillingness in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine still exists. It is therefore crucial to comprehend the intentions of adults regarding COVID-19 vaccination, which is beneficial for establishing community immunity and an efficient future pandemic response. An online survey was administered to 2722 adults in Vietnam. Cronbach's alpha, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test the reliability and validity of the developed scales. Then, structural equational modeling (SEM) was employed to test correlations. This study found that favorable attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines played the most important role in shaping adults' intention to receive these vaccines, followed by perceived behavioral control, perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccines, and subjective norms. Concurrently, all three core dimensions of the theory of planned behavior mediated the link between the perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccines and the intention to receive them. Also, there were significant differences between males and females in the way they formed this intention. The findings of this study offer valuable guidance for practitioners on how to encourage adults to receive COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as how to limit the transmission of the COVID-19 virus.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2022 Jan 28;40(4):594-600 [PMID: 34952758]
  2. Brain Behav. 2021 Nov;11(11):e2370 [PMID: 34543522]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jun;302:114981 [PMID: 35512613]
  4. Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:1-10 [PMID: 34597765]
  5. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 Feb 15;86:103539 [PMID: 36687293]
  6. Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(2):765-793 [PMID: 36124083]
  7. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Mar;19(3):495-501 [PMID: 36357271]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  9. J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Apr;160:180-186 [PMID: 36809746]
  10. Vaccine. 2021 Dec 20;39(52):7554-7561 [PMID: 34819224]
  11. Psychol Health. 2011 Sep;26(9):1113-27 [PMID: 21929476]
  12. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:52-60 [PMID: 33781902]
  13. Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):710-713 [PMID: 35041541]
  14. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Apr;24(4):419-425.e10 [PMID: 36774966]
  15. Vaccine. 2023 Feb 17;41(8):1419-1425 [PMID: 36697314]
  16. Encephale. 2022 Feb;48(1):38-42 [PMID: 34243957]
  17. Aging (Albany NY). 2020 May 29;12(10):9959-9981 [PMID: 32470948]
  18. Vaccine. 2021 Dec 3;39(49):7140-7145 [PMID: 34763947]
  19. J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 15;297:301-308 [PMID: 34715181]
  20. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Feb;65:102626 [PMID: 33288994]
  21. Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):e12715 [PMID: 30515964]
  22. Vaccine. 2022 Oct 6;40(42):6133-6140 [PMID: 36117003]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):804 [PMID: 33902501]
  24. Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Jun;5:100359 [PMID: 36818574]
  25. J Palliat Med. 2009 Jan;12(1):77-82 [PMID: 19284267]
  26. Biosaf Health. 2023 Feb;5(1):37-44 [PMID: 36588928]
  27. Vaccine. 2022 Apr 26;40(19):2772-2780 [PMID: 35339306]
  28. Radiography (Lond). 2022 May;28(2):537-544 [PMID: 34654631]
  29. Prev Med Rep. 2021 Sep;23:101417 [PMID: 34094818]
  30. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Aug;104(8):1878-1886 [PMID: 33632632]
  31. Vaccine. 2023 Feb 17;41(8):1490-1495 [PMID: 36707338]
  32. Appetite. 2019 Feb 1;133:414-422 [PMID: 30537527]
  33. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):1017-1022 [PMID: 34000711]
  34. Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 03;10:825874 [PMID: 35719675]
  35. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(2): [PMID: 36851167]
  36. Vaccine. 2021 Oct 8;39(42):6269-6275 [PMID: 34535313]
  37. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2022 Jan;34(1):106-112 [PMID: 34550027]
  38. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1596-1605 [PMID: 33431259]
  39. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2086393 [PMID: 35749588]
  40. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2065838 [PMID: 35452345]
  41. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Apr;18(4):2593-2599 [PMID: 33994325]
  42. Vaccine. 2022 Oct 26;40(45):6549-6557 [PMID: 36207222]
  43. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Feb 22;16(1):13 [PMID: 35193652]
  44. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Jan;16(1):102363 [PMID: 34922216]
  45. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Aug;41(3):924-36 [PMID: 19587209]
  46. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Aug;178:110869 [PMID: 36406744]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19vaccinationvaccinesintentionadultsreceiveperceivedbenefitsplannedbehaviorimmunitycontrolpandemicfactoranalysisteststructuralequationalmodelingstudytheoryessentialachieveherdorderrequireshighlevelrateDespiteimportancehesitancyunwillingnessreceivingvaccinestillexiststhereforecrucialcomprehendintentionsregardingbeneficialestablishingcommunityefficientfutureresponseonlinesurveyadministered2722VietnamCronbach'salphaexploratoryEFAconfirmatoryCFAusedreliabilityvaliditydevelopedscalesSEMemployedcorrelationsfoundfavorableattitudestowardplayedimportantroleshapingadults'followedbehavioralsubjectivenormsConcurrentlythreecoredimensionsmediatedlinkAlsosignificantdifferencesmalesfemaleswayformedfindingsoffervaluableguidancepractitionersencouragevaccinationswelllimittransmissionvirusUtilizingpredictintention:approachPerceivedTheory

Similar Articles

Cited By