Human Health Risk Assessment to the Consumption of Medicinal Plants with Melliferous Potential from the Romanian South-Eastern Region.

Lucica Barbeș, Alina Bărbulescu, Cristian Ştefan Dumitriu
Author Information
  1. Lucica Barbeș: Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, "Ovidius" University of Constanța, 124 Mamaia Bd., 900112 Constanta, Romania. ORCID
  2. Alina Bărbulescu: Department of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, 5 Turnului Str., 900152 Brasov, Romania. ORCID
  3. Cristian Ştefan Dumitriu: Faculty of Mechanical and Robotic Engineering in Construction, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, 124 Lacul Tei Av., 020396 Bucharest, Romania. ORCID

Abstract

This study presents the impact on human health by consuming medicinal herbs with high melliferous potential (HMPs) from botanical areas with different pollution levels. First, the bioaccumulation of the plants' parts has been determined. The study assessed the potential health risks associated with the ingestion of various mineral species (macroelements-K, Ca, Mg, Na; microelements-Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and one trace element Cd) from three types of HMPs ( (), (), and ()). The average concentrations of these elements were not similar even in the same type of HMPs. Nevertheless, all samples contained detectable levels of the studied elements. The average concentrations of the studied elements were very low (significantly lower than the legal limit set by the WHO). The study's findings indicated that the potential health risks associated with ingesting the elements in HMPs were within acceptable limits for children and adults. The hazard quotient (HQ) for Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, and Cd and the hazard index (HI) for the minerals from HMPs were significantly lower than the acceptable limit (HQ and HI = 1). Similarly, the carcinogenic risk for chemical substances (Riskccs) were lower than or close to the acceptable limit (1 × 10).

Keywords

References

  1. J Hazard Mater. 2022 Feb 15;424(Pt D):127682 [PMID: 34839979]
  2. Food Chem. 2017 Jan 15;215:22-30 [PMID: 27542446]
  3. Toxics. 2022 May 09;10(5): [PMID: 35622652]
  4. Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jan 14;192(2):111 [PMID: 31938942]
  5. J Food Prot. 2022 Dec 1;85(12):1797-1806 [PMID: 36173919]
  6. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 Mar;53:256-62 [PMID: 23261649]
  7. PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0276365 [PMID: 36327284]
  8. J Hazard Mater. 2017 Mar 5;325:36-58 [PMID: 27915099]
  9. J Health Pollut. 2021 Aug 17;11(31):210915 [PMID: 34434607]
  10. Circulation. 2018 Jan 16;137(3):247-249 [PMID: 29335285]
  11. Food Chem. 2022 Sep 1;387:132920 [PMID: 35413557]
  12. Toxics. 2021 Feb 25;9(3): [PMID: 33668829]
  13. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Nov 4;174:464-73 [PMID: 26320686]
  14. EFSA J. 2017 Oct 24;15(10):e05043 [PMID: 32625326]
  15. New Phytol. 2006;172(4):646-54 [PMID: 17096791]
  16. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(27):33743-33752 [PMID: 32533491]
  17. Food Res Int. 2021 May;143:110268 [PMID: 33992369]
  18. J Hazard Mater. 2015 Apr 9;286:386-94 [PMID: 25600581]
  19. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Jun;45(6):1060-4 [PMID: 17291663]
  20. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2023 Mar;201(3):1503-1519 [PMID: 35467266]
  21. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2022 Mar;200(3):1442-1454 [PMID: 34021873]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;17(5): [PMID: 32111044]
  23. Heliyon. 2022 Sep 06;8(9):e10535 [PMID: 36110232]
  24. J Anal Methods Chem. 2017;2017:9748413 [PMID: 28630784]
  25. Plants (Basel). 2021 May 26;10(6): [PMID: 34073642]
  26. Environ Pollut. 2020 Jan;256:113388 [PMID: 31662258]
  27. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Dec 05;8(4): [PMID: 31817375]
  28. Nat Prod Res. 2011 Mar;25(5):496-510 [PMID: 21391113]
  29. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(Pt C):11-465 [PMID: 23189751]
  30. N Biotechnol. 2015 Jan 25;32(1):147-56 [PMID: 24462777]
  31. Environ Geochem Health. 2019 Jun;41(3):1291-1302 [PMID: 30415396]
  32. J Funct Foods. 2018 Jan;40:377-390 [PMID: 32362939]
  33. Toxics. 2022 Aug 27;10(9): [PMID: 36136464]
  34. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013 Jan 1;100:149-54 [PMID: 22579329]
  35. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 14;11:595335 [PMID: 33597875]
  36. J Environ Monit. 2012 May;14(6):1622-30 [PMID: 22566009]
  37. Saudi Pharm J. 2020 Jul;28(7):779-790 [PMID: 32647479]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HMPselementshealthpotentiallowerlimitacceptablestudymelliferouspollutionlevelsrisksassociatedMnCuZnCdaverageconcentrationsstudiedsignificantlyhazardHQHI1presentsimpacthumanconsumingmedicinalherbshighbotanicalareasdifferentFirstbioaccumulationplants'partsdeterminedassessedingestionvariousmineralspeciesmacroelements-KCaMgNamicroelements-FeonetraceelementthreetypessimilareventypeNeverthelesssamplescontaineddetectablelowlegalsetWHOstudy'sfindingsindicatedingestingwithinlimitschildrenadultsquotientFeindexminerals=SimilarlycarcinogenicriskchemicalsubstancesRiskccsclose×10HumanHealthRiskAssessmentConsumptionMedicinalPlantsMelliferousPotentialRomanianSouth-EasternRegionplantsindicatorsstatisticalanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By