A Multicriteria-Based Comparison of Electric Vehicles Using q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Numbers.

Sanjib Biswas, Aparajita Sanyal, Darko Božanić, Samarjit Kar, Aleksandar Milić, Adis Puška
Author Information
  1. Sanjib Biswas: Decision Science & Operations Management Area, Calcutta Business School, Diamond Harbour Road, Bishnupur Kolkata 743503, West Bengal, India. ORCID
  2. Aparajita Sanyal: Marketing Area, Calcutta Business School, Diamond Harbour Road, Bishnupur Kolkata 743503, West Bengal, India.
  3. Darko Božanić: Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, Veljka Lukica Kurjaka 33, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia. ORCID
  4. Samarjit Kar: Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur 713209, West Bengal, India.
  5. Aleksandar Milić: Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, Veljka Lukica Kurjaka 33, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia. ORCID
  6. Adis Puška: Department of Public Safety, Government of Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulevara Mira 1, 76100 Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina. ORCID

Abstract

The subject of this research is the evaluation of electric cars and the choice of car that best meets the set research criteria. To this end, the criteria weights were determined using the entropy method with two-step normalization and a full consistency check. In addition, the entropy method was extended further with q-rung orthopair fuzzy (qROF) information and Einstein aggregation for carrying out decision making under uncertainty with imprecise information. Sustainable transportation was selected as the area of application. The current work compared a set of 20 leading EVs in India using the proposed decision-making model. The comparison was designed to cover two aspects: technical attributes and user opinions. For the ranking of the EVs, a recently developed multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model, the alternative ranking order method with two-step normalization (AROMAN), was used. The present work is a novel hybridization of the entropy method, full consistency method (FUCOM), and AROMAN in an uncertain environment. The results show that the electricity consumption criterion (w = 0.0944) received the greatest weight, while the best ranked alternative was A7. The results also show robustness and stability, as revealed through a comparison with the other MCDM models and a sensitivity analysis. The present work is different from the past studies, as it provides a robust hybrid decision-making model that uses both objective and subjective information.

Keywords

References

  1. Financ Innov. 2023;9(1):41 [PMID: 36691444]
  2. Rev Socionetwork Strateg. 2022;16(2):221-238 [PMID: 35600566]
  3. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0246485 [PMID: 33630877]
  4. Data Brief. 2019 Oct 11;27:104644 [PMID: 31687445]
  5. BMJ. 2014 Nov 28;349:g7327 [PMID: 25432873]
  6. Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106850 [PMID: 34531034]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0methodentropytwo-stepnormalizationinformationworkdecision-makingmodelrankingalternativeAROMANresearchelectricbestsetcriteriausingfullconsistencyq-rungorthopairfuzzyEinsteinaggregationtransportationEVscomparisonMCDMorderpresentresultsshowsubjectevaluationcarschoicecarmeetsendweightsdeterminedcheckadditionextendedqROFcarryingdecisionmakinguncertaintyimpreciseSustainableselectedareaapplicationcurrentcompared20leadingIndiaproposeddesignedcovertwoaspects:technicalattributesuseropinionsrecentlydevelopedmulticriteriausednovelhybridizationFUCOMuncertainenvironmentelectricityconsumptioncriterionw=00944receivedgreatestweightrankedA7alsorobustnessstabilityrevealedmodelssensitivityanalysisdifferentpaststudiesprovidesrobusthybridusesobjectivesubjectiveMulticriteria-BasedComparisonElectricVehiclesUsingq-RungOrthopairFuzzyNumbersaccountingvehiclessustainable

Similar Articles

Cited By