A Behavioural-Theory-Based Qualitative Study of the Beliefs and Perceptions of Marginalised Populations towards Community Volunteering to Increase Measles Immunisation Coverage in Sabah, Malaysia.

Hazeqa Salleh, Richard Avoi, Haryati Abdul Karim, Suhaila Osman, Prabakaran Dhanaraj, Mohd Ali 'Imran Ab Rahman
Author Information
  1. Hazeqa Salleh: Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia. ORCID
  2. Richard Avoi: Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia. ORCID
  3. Haryati Abdul Karim: Communications Programme, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Sabah, Malaysia. ORCID
  4. Suhaila Osman: Sabah State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Kota Kinabalu 88590, Sabah, Malaysia.
  5. Prabakaran Dhanaraj: Kota Kinabalu District Health Office, Ministry of Health, Kota Kinabalu 88300, Sabah, Malaysia.
  6. Mohd Ali 'Imran Ab Rahman: Social Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Selangor, Malaysia. ORCID

Abstract

The development of the measles-containing vaccine (MCV) has rendered measles a largely preventable disease. In the state of Sabah in Malaysia, a complete course of measles immunisation for infants involves vaccinations at the ages of six, nine, and twelve months. However, it is difficult for marginalised populations to receive a complete course of measles immunisation. This present study used behavioural theory (BT) to examine the beliefs and perceptions of a marginalised population towards community volunteering as a method of increasing the immunisation coverage of measles. Marginalised populations living in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, more specifically, Malaysian citizens living in urban slums and squatter areas, as well as legal and illegal migrants, were extensively interviewed in person for this qualitative study. The 40 respondents were either the parents or primary caregivers of at least one child under the age of five. The components of the Health Belief Model were then used to examine the collected data. The respondents had poor awareness of the measles disease and perceived the disease as not severe, with some even refusing immunisation. The perceived barriers to receiving vaccinations included a nomadic lifestyle; issues with finances, citizenship status, language, and weather; failing to remember immunisation schedules; a fear of health care personnel; having too many children; and a lack of female autonomy in vaccine decision-making. However, the respondents were receptive towards community-based programmes and many welcomed a recall or reminder system, especially when the volunteers were family members or neighbours who spoke the same language and knew their village well. A few, however, found it awkward to have volunteers assisting them. Evidence-based decision making may increase measles immunisation coverage in marginalised populations. The components of the Health Belief Model validated that the respondents lacked awareness of the measles disease and viewed it and its effects as not severe. Therefore, future volunteer programmes should prioritise increasing the receptivity and self-control of marginalised populations to overcome barriers that hinder community involvement. A community-based volunteer programme is highly recommended to increase measles immunisation coverage.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccine. 2023 Feb 17;41(8):1419-1425 [PMID: 36697314]
  2. J Infect Public Health. 2020 Feb;13(2):199-203 [PMID: 31431420]
  3. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  4. Vaccine. 2023 Mar 17;41(12):1911-1915 [PMID: 36682984]
  5. J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;228:87-93.e2 [PMID: 32771480]
  6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Nov 25;71(47):1489-1495 [PMID: 36417303]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 19;18(1):1389 [PMID: 30567528]
  8. Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Mar;7(3):300-302 [PMID: 36755132]
  9. Vaccine. 2012 Aug 24;30(39):5721-5 [PMID: 22819988]
  10. Hum Vaccin. 2008 Jul-Aug;4(4):316-9 [PMID: 18398296]
  11. Curr Opin Virol. 2019 Feb;34:110-116 [PMID: 30852425]
  12. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 29;9(9): [PMID: 34579204]
  13. Vaccine. 2017 Oct 27;35(45):6059-6069 [PMID: 28974409]
  14. Voluntas. 2022;33(1):1-17 [PMID: 35095218]
  15. Vaccine. 2015 Jun 9;33(25):2862-80 [PMID: 25944299]
  16. Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Dec 30;9(1): [PMID: 33396832]
  17. Glob Public Health. 2020 Aug;15(8):1168-1181 [PMID: 32290768]
  18. Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 08;39:192 [PMID: 34603573]
  19. Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;11(2): [PMID: 36851166]
  20. Health Promot Int. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):636-649 [PMID: 26802073]
  21. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):58-65 [PMID: 35767527]
  22. Vaccine. 2022 Apr 26;40(19):2772-2780 [PMID: 35339306]
  23. J Health Commun. 2018;23(6):514-522 [PMID: 29757123]
  24. Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;83:83-85 [PMID: 30986543]
  25. Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9;41(2):496-503 [PMID: 36494253]
  26. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Feb;32(1):151-159 [PMID: 31790027]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 8;17(1):556 [PMID: 28595624]
  28. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e017459 [PMID: 28951412]
  29. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13): [PMID: 35805675]
  30. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211029800 [PMID: 34218701]
  31. J Community Psychol. 2023 Jul;51(5):2010-2025 [PMID: 36599084]
  32. Health Commun. 2015;30(6):566-76 [PMID: 25010519]
  33. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907 [PMID: 29937585]
  34. PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 16;19(8):e1004060 [PMID: 35972985]
  35. Acad Pediatr. 2021 May-Jun;21(4S):S9-S16 [PMID: 33958099]
  36. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Sep 10;3(5):e000837 [PMID: 30233833]
  37. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0241488 [PMID: 33166370]
  38. Vaccine. 2017 May 19;35(22):2955-2961 [PMID: 28434687]
  39. BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 13;18(Suppl 4):1316 [PMID: 30541502]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0measlesimmunisationmarginaliseddiseasepopulationscoveragerespondentsSabahtowardscommunityvaccineMalaysiacompletecoursevaccinationsHoweverstudyusedexaminebeliefsvolunteeringincreasingMarginalisedlivingwellcomponentsHealthBeliefModelawarenessperceivedseverebarrierslanguagehealthmanycommunity-basedprogrammesvolunteersincreasevolunteerdevelopmentmeasles-containingMCVrenderedlargelypreventablestateinfantsinvolvesagessixninetwelvemonthsdifficultreceivepresentbehaviouraltheoryBTperceptionspopulationmethodKotaKinabaluspecificallyMalaysiancitizensurbanslumssquatterareaslegalillegalmigrantsextensivelyinterviewedpersonqualitative40eitherparentsprimarycaregiversleastonechildagefivecollecteddatapoorevenrefusingreceivingincludednomadiclifestyleissuesfinancescitizenshipstatusweatherfailingrememberschedulesfearcarepersonnelchildrenlackfemaleautonomydecision-makingreceptivewelcomedrecallremindersystemespeciallyfamilymembersneighboursspokeknewvillagehoweverfoundawkwardassistingEvidence-baseddecisionmakingmayvalidatedlackedviewedeffectsThereforefutureprioritisereceptivityself-controlovercomehinderinvolvementprogrammehighlyrecommendedBehavioural-Theory-BasedQualitativeStudyBeliefsPerceptionsPopulationsCommunityVolunteeringIncreaseMeaslesImmunisationCoveragebeliefmodelpopulations’

Similar Articles

Cited By