Fostering Success and Promoting Professional Development of Clinician Educator Mentees: A Workshop for Mentors.

Hollis D Day, Emelia J Benjamin, Sangeeta Lamba, Keith C Norris, Christine Pfund, Maria L Soto-Greene
Author Information
  1. Hollis D Day: Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center/Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine. ORCID
  2. Emelia J Benjamin: Professor, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center/Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine; Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health.
  3. Sangeeta Lamba: Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School; Vice Chancellor for Diversity and Inclusion, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences.
  4. Keith C Norris: Professor, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
  5. Christine Pfund: Senior Scientist, Wisconsin Center for Education Research and Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  6. Maria L Soto-Greene: Professor, Department of Medicine, and Executive Vice Dean, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School.

Abstract

Introduction: The goal of academic mentoring relationships is to enable the mentee to identify/achieve professional advancement. Although mentors of clinician educators (CEs) must understand the criteria for successful career advancement, few have received formal CE mentor training.
Methods: The National Research Mentoring Network convened an expert panel to develop a 90-minute module for training CE mentors. This module included individual development plans, case studies involving challenges for CE faculty, and examples of the broadened scope of scholarly activity. The workshop was delivered to 26 participants across four institutions and evaluated by a retrospective pre/post survey.
Results: Using a 7-point scale (1 = 4 = 7 = ), participants rated the overall quality of their CE mentoring as slightly below average preworkshop ( = 3.9) and as above average postworkshop ( = 5.2, < .001). Areas of greatest self-perceived change in skills on a 7-point scale (1 = 4 = 7 =  ) included setting clear expectations of the mentoring relationship (pre = 3.6, post = 5.1, < .001), aligning mentor expectations with those of mentees (pre = 3.6, post = 5.0, < .001), and helping mentees set career goals (pre = 3.9, post = 5.4, < .001).
Discussion: This module trains CE mentors using an interactive and collective problem-solving approach. Workshop participants better defined demonstrable markers for CE progression with potential to impact tailored guidance for mentees.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 12;73(5):620-623 [PMID: 30732717]
  2. Acad Med. 2014 May;89(5):774-82 [PMID: 24667509]
  3. Med Educ. 2016 Jun;50(6):670-81 [PMID: 27170085]
  4. Med Teach. 2019 Aug;41(8):927-933 [PMID: 31007114]
  5. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1346-50 [PMID: 15576527]
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3113-3121 [PMID: 33846943]
  7. Am J Med Sci. 2017 Feb;353(2):151-157 [PMID: 28183416]
  8. Am J Med. 2018 Nov;131(11):1387-1394 [PMID: 30076827]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR002373/NCATS NIH HHS
  2. RL5GM1189XX/NIGMS NIH HHS
  3. TL4GM1189XX/NIGMS NIH HHS
  4. 1UL1GM1189XX/NIGMS NIH HHS
  5. U54 GM119023/NIGMS NIH HHS
  6. U54 GM119024/NIGMS NIH HHS
  7. R01 HL092577/NHLBI NIH HHS
  8. R01 HL128914/NHLBI NIH HHS
  9. P50 HL120163/NHLBI NIH HHS
  10. UL1 TR002373/NCATS NIH HHS
  11. R01 HL092577/NHLBI NIH HHS
  12. U54 HL120163/NHLBI NIH HHS
  13. UL1 TR001881/NCATS NIH HHS
  14. P30 AG021684/NIA NIH HHS
  15. U2C DK129496/NIDDK NIH HHS
  16. P50 MD017366/NIMHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Mentors
Retrospective Studies
Mentoring
Faculty
Problem Solving

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0=CE35<001mentoringmentorsmoduleparticipants14prepostmenteesadvancementcareermentortrainingincluded7-pointscale7average9expectations6WorkshopDevelopmentClinicianEducatorIntroduction:goalacademicrelationshipsenablementeeidentify/achieveprofessionalAlthoughclinicianeducatorsCEsmustunderstandcriteriasuccessfulreceivedformalMethods:NationalResearchMentoringNetworkconvenedexpertpaneldevelop90-minuteindividualdevelopmentplanscasestudiesinvolvingchallengesfacultyexamplesbroadenedscopescholarlyactivityworkshopdelivered26acrossfourinstitutionsevaluatedretrospectivepre/postsurveyResults:Usingratedoverallqualityslightlypreworkshoppostworkshop2Areasgreatestself-perceivedchangeskillssettingclearrelationshipaligning0helpingsetgoalsDiscussion:trainsusinginteractivecollectiveproblem-solvingapproachbetterdefineddemonstrablemarkersprogressionpotentialimpacttailoredguidanceFosteringSuccessPromotingProfessionalMentees:MentorsCase-BasedLearningFacultyMentoring/CoachingPromotions&Tenure

Similar Articles

Cited By