Patients Aged >50 Years With Anterior Shoulder Instability Have a Decreased Risk of Recurrent Dislocation After Operative Treatment Compared With Non-Operative Treatment.

Anne A Smartt, Ryan R Wilbur, Bryant M Song, Aaron J Krych, Kelechi Okoroha, Jonathan D Barlow, Christopher L Camp
Author Information
  1. Anne A Smartt: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  2. Ryan R Wilbur: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  3. Bryant M Song: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  4. Aaron J Krych: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  5. Kelechi Okoroha: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  6. Jonathan D Barlow: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
  7. Christopher L Camp: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of operative and nonoperative management, identify risk factors for recurrent instability, and identify risk factors for progression to surgery after failed nonoperative management for patients with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation after the age of 50 years.
Methods: An established geographic medical record system was used to identify patients who experienced a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation after the age of 50 years. Patient medical records were reviewed to identify treatment decisions and outcomes of interest, including rates of frozen shoulder and nerve palsy, progression to osteoarthritis, recurrent instability, and progression to surgery. Outcomes were evaluated using Chi-square tests and survivorship curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier methods. A Cox model was developed to evaluate for potential risk factors of recurrent instability and progression to surgery after an initial trail of at least 3 months of nonoperative treatment.
Results: 179 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 11 years. 14% ( = 26) underwent early surgery within 3 months and 86% ( = 153) were initially treated nonoperatively. Mean age (59 years), was similar for both groups, but those that underwent early surgery had an increased rate of full-thickness rotator cuff tears (82% vs 55%;  = .01), labral tears (24% vs 8.0%;  = .01), and humeral head fracture (23% vs 8.5%;  = .03). When comparing the early surgery group to the nonoperative group, there were similar rates of persistent moderate-severe pain (19% vs 17%;  = .78) and frozen shoulder (8 vs 9%, respectively;  = .87) at final follow-up. Although nerve palsy (19% vs 8%;  = .08) and progression to osteoarthritis (20% vs 14%;  = .40) were more common in surgical patients, they experienced lower rates of recurrent instability after surgical intervention (0% vs 15%;  = .03) compared to nonoperatively treated patients. Increasing number of instability events prior to presentation was the greatest risk factor for recurrent instability (HR 232; < .01). Fourteen percent ( = 21) failed initial nonoperative treatment and proceeded to surgical intervention at an average of 4.6 years after the initial instability event, and the greatest risk factors for progression to surgery were recurrent instability (HR 3.41; < .01).
Conclusions: Although the majority of patients >50 years that experience ASI are treated nonoperatively, those that require surgery tend to have more significant injury pathology, a lower risk of recurrent instability after surgery, but a higher progression to osteoarthritis compared to patients that do not require surgical intervention. There was no difference in pain severity at final follow-up, rates of frozen shoulder or nerve palsy between patients who underwent initial nonoperative treatment after instability and those who underwent surgery. A history of multiple instability episodes prior to presentation was the greatest predictor of recurrent instability and failure of nonoperative treatment and progression to surgery.
Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

References

  1. Arthroscopy. 2005 Jan;21(1):55-63 [PMID: 15650667]
  2. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;48(1):56-62 [PMID: 31756127]
  3. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 May;126(4):235-40 [PMID: 16151824]
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 May;76(3):381-3 [PMID: 8175837]
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1677-84 [PMID: 8934481]
  6. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):339-47 [PMID: 19254851]
  7. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct;20(10):615-22 [PMID: 23027691]
  8. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Oct;64(5):549-52 [PMID: 8237322]
  9. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):111-3 [PMID: 15789001]
  10. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Feb;31(2):352-358 [PMID: 34454036]
  11. Arthroscopy. 1999 Jul-Aug;15(5):507-14 [PMID: 10424554]
  12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 May;(206):192-5 [PMID: 3708974]
  13. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983 Mar;65(3):343-9 [PMID: 6826597]
  14. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):23259671211053326 [PMID: 34888391]
  15. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 May 1;173(9):1059-68 [PMID: 21430193]
  16. Int Orthop. 2007 Jun;31(3):385-9 [PMID: 16909255]
  17. Arthroscopy. 2007 Feb;23(2):118-23 [PMID: 17276217]
  18. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2090-2096 [PMID: 32579397]
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):540-3 [PMID: 9250734]
  20. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 18;2018:8961805 [PMID: 30105260]
  21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jun;(291):103-6 [PMID: 8504589]
  22. Arthroscopy. 2010 Feb;26(2):239-48 [PMID: 20141987]
  23. Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1093-8 [PMID: 23508865]
  24. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2006 Dec;14(4):192-8 [PMID: 17135968]
  25. Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1614-24 [PMID: 23159830]
  26. JSES Int. 2019 Dec 16;4(1):72-76 [PMID: 32544934]
  27. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2124-31 [PMID: 17908886]
  28. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Apr;4(2):104-8 [PMID: 27200385]
  29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):542-9 [PMID: 20194311]
  30. Int Orthop. 2009 Jun;33(3):719-23 [PMID: 18500515]
  31. Arthroscopy. 2012 Apr;28(4):565-75 [PMID: 22336435]
  32. Arthroscopy. 2006 Mar;22(3):270-6 [PMID: 16517310]
  33. Orthop Clin North Am. 2000 Apr;31(2):231-9 [PMID: 10736392]
  34. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Nov 11;8(11):2325967120962515 [PMID: 33241059]
  35. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Nov;47(13):3057-3064 [PMID: 31513452]
  36. Arthroscopy. 2009 Mar;25(3):298-304 [PMID: 19245994]
  37. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec 15;2(6):e761-e769 [PMID: 33364614]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0instabilitysurgery =recurrentprogressionpatientsvsnonoperativeriskyearsshouldertreatmentidentifyfactorsratesinitialunderwent01surgicalagefrozennervepalsyosteoarthritis3follow-upearlytreatednonoperatively8interventiongreatestoutcomesmanagementfailedfirst-timeanteriordislocation50medicalexperiencedusingmonths14%similartears0%03grouppain19%finalAlthoughlowercomparedpriorpresentationHR<>50requireTreatmentPurpose:compareclinicaloperativeMethods:establishedgeographicrecordsystemusedPatientrecordsrevieweddecisionsinterestincludingOutcomesevaluatedChi-squaretestssurvivorshipcurvesgeneratedKaplan-MeiermethodsCoxmodeldevelopedevaluatepotentialtrailleastResults:179includedmean1126within86%153initiallyMean59groupsincreasedratefull-thicknessrotatorcuff82%55%labral24%humeralheadfracture23%5%comparingpersistentmoderate-severe17%789%respectively878%0820%40common15%Increasingnumbereventsfactor232Fourteenpercent21proceededaverage46event41Conclusions:majorityexperienceASItendsignificantinjurypathologyhigherdifferenceseverityhistorymultipleepisodespredictorfailureLevelEvidence:LevelIIIretrospectivecohortstudyPatientsAgedYearsAnteriorShoulderInstabilityDecreasedRiskRecurrentDislocationOperativeComparedNon-Operative

Similar Articles

Cited By