Intraverbal Assessment for Persons with Aphasia or Other Acquired Brain Injury.

Barbara E Esch, Tracie L Lindblad, Brittany Clark, Zareen Ali
Author Information
  1. Barbara E Esch: Esch Behavioral Consultants LLC, PO Box 20002, Kalamazoo, MI 49019 USA. ORCID
  2. Tracie L Lindblad: Tracie Lindblad Consulting, Grimsby, Ontario Canada.
  3. Brittany Clark: Evergreen Communication Therapy Ltd., Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
  4. Zareen Ali: Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

An intraverbal assessment was administered to older adults with aphasia, using a hierarchy of questions that required increasingly complex verbal discriminative stimulus control. Five categories of errors were defined and analyzed for putative stimulus control, with the aim to identify requisite assessment components leading to more efficient and effective treatments. Evocative control over intraverbal error responses was evident throughout the database, as shown by commonalities within four distinct categories of errors; a fifth category, representing a narrow majority of errors, was less clear in terms of functional control over responses. Generally, questions requiring increasingly complex intraverbal stimulus control resulted in weaker verbal performance for those with aphasia. A new 9-point intraverbal assessment model is proposed, based on Skinner's functional analysis of verbal behavior. The study underscores that loss or disruption of a formerly sophisticated language repertoire presents differently than the fledgling language skills and errors of new learners, such as typically developing children and those with autism or developmental disabilities. Thus, we would do well to consider that rehabilitation may require a different approach to intervention than habilitation. We offer several thematic topics for future research in this area.

Keywords

References

  1. Anal Verbal Behav. 2007;23:123-33 [PMID: 22477386]
  2. Anal Verbal Behav. 2014 Jan 01;30(1):36-47 [PMID: 27274972]
  3. Anal Verbal Behav. 1992;10:11-21 [PMID: 22477043]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):685-90 [PMID: 20190929]
  5. Anal Verbal Behav. 2011;27(1):3-22 [PMID: 22532752]
  6. Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;16(1):9-23 [PMID: 22478128]
  7. Behav Anal. 1990 Fall;13(2):205-10 [PMID: 22478071]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39): [PMID: 34544853]
  9. Anal Verbal Behav. 2005;21:9-12 [PMID: 22477310]
  10. Anal Verbal Behav. 2008;24:147-58 [PMID: 22477410]
  11. Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;19(2):163-97 [PMID: 22478257]
  12. J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Summer;45(2):431-5 [PMID: 22844151]
  13. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Nov 4;32(2):242-264 [PMID: 30800629]
  14. Anal Verbal Behav. 2013;29(1):125-35 [PMID: 23814373]
  15. Anal Verbal Behav. 2005;21:27-41 [PMID: 22477312]
  16. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Feb;54(1):113-24 [PMID: 2464719]
  17. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Sep 12;32(2):96-106 [PMID: 30800619]
  18. Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;10(1):41-5 [PMID: 22477959]
  19. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Sep 22;32(2):154-170 [PMID: 30800623]
  20. Behav Anal. 2008 Fall;31(2):145-61 [PMID: 22478508]
  21. Anal Verbal Behav. 1990;8:67-76 [PMID: 22477605]
  22. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Summer;44(2):255-78 [PMID: 21709783]
  23. Anal Verbal Behav. 2011;27(1):23-43 [PMID: 22532753]
  24. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Oct 21;32(2):107-124 [PMID: 30800620]
  25. Anal Verbal Behav. 2013;29(1):85-99 [PMID: 23814369]
  26. Anal Verbal Behav. 1990;8:83-99 [PMID: 22477607]
  27. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Nov 1;32(2):139-153 [PMID: 30800622]
  28. Anal Verbal Behav. 2008;24:159-74 [PMID: 22477411]
  29. J Psychiatr Res. 1971 Aug;8(3):413-22 [PMID: 5112226]
  30. Anal Verbal Behav. 2014 Jul 19;30(2):113-27 [PMID: 27433436]
  31. Anal Verbal Behav. 2021 Aug 10;37(2):226-236 [PMID: 35141108]
  32. Behav Ther. 2011 Mar;42(1):120-6 [PMID: 21292058]
  33. Behav Anal. 2012 Spring;35(1):59-73 [PMID: 22942536]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0controlintraverbalerrorsassessmentverbalstimulusaphasiaquestionsincreasinglycomplexcategoriesresponsesfunctionalnewlanguageskillsAphasiaBrainadministeredolderadultsusinghierarchyrequireddiscriminativeFivedefinedanalyzedputativeaimidentifyrequisitecomponentsleadingefficienteffectivetreatmentsEvocativeerrorevidentthroughoutdatabaseshowncommonalitieswithinfourdistinctfifthcategoryrepresentingnarrowmajoritylesscleartermsGenerallyrequiringresultedweakerperformance9-pointmodelproposedbasedSkinner'sanalysisbehaviorstudyunderscoreslossdisruptionformerlysophisticatedrepertoirepresentsdifferentlyfledglinglearnerstypicallydevelopingchildrenautismdevelopmentaldisabilitiesThuswellconsiderrehabilitationmayrequiredifferentapproachinterventionhabilitationofferseveralthematictopicsfutureresearchareaIntraverbalAssessmentPersonsAcquiredInjuryinjuryLanguageSpeechStimulus

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.