Huntington disease exacerbates action impulses.

Shuhei Shiino, Nelleke Corine van Wouwe, Scott A Wylie, Daniel O Claassen, Katherine E McDonell
Author Information
  1. Shuhei Shiino: Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
  2. Nelleke Corine van Wouwe: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
  3. Scott A Wylie: Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
  4. Daniel O Claassen: Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
  5. Katherine E McDonell: Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

Abstract

Background: Impulsivity is a common clinical feature of Huntington disease (HD), but the underlying cognitive dynamics of impulse control in this population have not been well-studied.
Objective: To investigate the temporal dynamics of action impulse control in HD patients using an inhibitory action control task.
Methods: Sixteen motor manifest HD patients and seventeen age-matched healthy controls (HC) completed the action control task. We applied the activation-suppression theoretical model and distributional analytic techniques to differentiate the strength of fast impulses from their top-down suppression.
Results: Overall, HD patients produced slower and less accurate reactions than HCs. HD patients also exhibited an exacerbated interference effect, as evidenced by a greater slowing of RT on non-corresponding compared to corresponding trials. HD patients made more fast, impulsive errors than HC, evidenced by significantly lower accuracy on their fastest reaction time trials. The slope reduction of interference effects as reactions slowed was similar between HD and controls, indicating preserved impulse suppression.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that patients with HD show a greater susceptibility to act rapidly on incorrect motor impulses but preserved proficiency of top-down suppression. Further research is needed to determine how these findings relate to clinical behavioral symptoms.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 12;8:2363 [PMID: 29375455]
  2. J Exp Psychol. 1969 Jul;81(1):174-6 [PMID: 5812172]
  3. Brain Res Bull. 2010 May 31;82(3-4):201-7 [PMID: 20385209]
  4. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2013 Jan 01;5(1):1-18 [PMID: 23277034]
  5. J Neurosci Res. 2019 Dec;97(12):1636-1654 [PMID: 31304622]
  6. J Neurosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7316-24 [PMID: 22623677]
  7. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Sep;8(9):791-801 [PMID: 19646924]
  8. Exp Brain Res. 2022 Aug;240(7-8):1957-1966 [PMID: 35562536]
  9. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;79(8):874-80 [PMID: 18096682]
  10. J Neurosci. 2013 Aug 14;33(33):13259-69 [PMID: 23946385]
  11. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Sep;39(7):694-706 [PMID: 27892808]
  12. Biol Psychol. 2014 Sep;101:44-60 [PMID: 25017503]
  13. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Aug;24(8):1709-24 [PMID: 22571461]
  14. Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):479-83 [PMID: 18522058]
  15. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1290-7 [PMID: 18241897]
  16. J Huntingtons Dis. 2017;6(1):73-78 [PMID: 28339399]
  17. Mov Disord. 2012 Aug;27(9):1083-91 [PMID: 22692795]
  18. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;78(2):127-33 [PMID: 17028117]
  19. Brain. 2009 Jun;132(Pt 6):1624-32 [PMID: 19369489]
  20. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jul;12(7):637-49 [PMID: 23664844]
  21. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):115-6 [PMID: 12536210]
  22. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 May;28(5):710-23 [PMID: 26836515]
  23. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;65(4):467-71 [PMID: 9771767]
  24. Neurology. 2004 Jul 13;63(1):66-72 [PMID: 15249612]
  25. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Dec 13;4:222 [PMID: 21179583]
  26. J Huntingtons Dis. 2021;10(2):313-322 [PMID: 33896846]
  27. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1996 Apr;18(2):276-90 [PMID: 8780962]
  28. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jul;47(8-9):1844-53 [PMID: 19428416]
  29. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 1;173(2):184-92 [PMID: 26472629]
  30. Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70 [PMID: 2186425]
  31. Brain Cogn. 2007 Apr;63(3):260-70 [PMID: 17069944]
  32. Mov Disord. 2014 Apr 15;29(5):673-83 [PMID: 24757115]
  33. Psychol Res. 1995;58(3):193-205 [PMID: 8570787]
  34. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 8;45(7):1408-19 [PMID: 17178419]
  35. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015 Apr;15(4):445-58 [PMID: 25773746]
  36. Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):130-5 [PMID: 8008775]
  37. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Apr;22(4):426-35 [PMID: 26708084]
  38. Eur J Neurol. 2008 Nov;15(11):1180-90 [PMID: 18754766]
  39. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1585-99 [PMID: 17428779]
  40. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Aug;20(4):731-50 [PMID: 8083631]
  41. J Huntingtons Dis. 2021;10(2):277-291 [PMID: 33646170]
  42. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 May;114(2):197-215 [PMID: 15869351]
  43. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Apr 02;8:103 [PMID: 24765067]
  44. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):145-57 [PMID: 18761363]
  45. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 [PMID: 15817019]
  46. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Nov 1;32(7):876-887 [PMID: 28961886]
  47. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):366-73 [PMID: 19782093]
  48. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;22(9):2058-73 [PMID: 19702465]
  49. Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1791-800 [PMID: 17321554]
  50. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;3(11):1079-1086 [PMID: 27663851]
  51. Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Jan;220(1):501-12 [PMID: 24240602]
  52. Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):351-7 [PMID: 16623694]
  53. J Huntingtons Dis. 2016 Dec 15;5(4):303-331 [PMID: 27983564]
  54. J Neurosci. 2007 May 2;27(18):4832-8 [PMID: 17475791]
  55. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0148409 [PMID: 26872129]
  56. Cortex. 2014 Sep;58:72-85 [PMID: 24959703]
  57. Brain Cogn. 2020 Jun;141:105560 [PMID: 32179366]
  58. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019 Mar;60:111-117 [PMID: 30201420]
  59. Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):324-36 [PMID: 12466929]
  60. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Oct;20(10):1854-65 [PMID: 18370596]
  61. J Huntingtons Dis. 2020;9(3):231-243 [PMID: 32894248]
  62. Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1387-401 [PMID: 11707094]

Grants

  1. K23 NS126628/NINDS NIH HHS
  2. P50 HD103537/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HDpatientscontrolactionHuntingtondiseaseimpulsetaskmotorimpulsessuppressioninterferenceclinicaldynamicsinhibitorycontrolsHCfasttop-downreactionsevidencedgreatertrialspreservedBackground:Impulsivitycommonfeatureunderlyingcognitivepopulationwell-studiedObjective:investigatetemporalusingMethods:Sixteenmanifestseventeenage-matchedhealthycompletedappliedactivation-suppressiontheoreticalmodeldistributionalanalytictechniquesdifferentiatestrengthResults:OverallproducedslowerlessaccurateHCsalsoexhibitedexacerbatedeffectslowingRTnon-correspondingcomparedcorrespondingmadeimpulsiveerrorssignificantlyloweraccuracyfastestreactiontimeslopereductioneffectsslowedsimilarindicatingConclusion:resultsindicateshowsusceptibilityactrapidlyincorrectproficiencyresearchneededdeterminefindingsrelatebehavioralsymptomsexacerbatesSimonimpulsivity

Similar Articles

Cited By