On the similarity between aortic and carotid pressure diastolic decay: a mathematical modelling study.

Vasiliki Bikia, Georgios Rovas, Sokratis Anagnostopoulos, Nikolaos Stergiopulos
Author Information
  1. Vasiliki Bikia: Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland. vasiliki.bikia@epfl.ch.
  2. Georgios Rovas: Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  3. Sokratis Anagnostopoulos: Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  4. Nikolaos Stergiopulos: Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Technology, Institute of Bioengineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Abstract

Aortic diastolic pressure decay (DPD) has been shown to have considerable pathophysiological relevance in the assessment of vascular health, as it is significantly affected by arterial stiffening. Nonetheless, the aortic pressure waveform is rarely available and hence the utility of the aortic DPD is limited. On the other hand, carotid blood pressure is often used as a surrogate of central (aortic) blood pressure in cardiovascular monitoring. Although the two waveforms are inherently different, it is unknown whether the aortic DPD shares a common pattern with the carotid DPD. In this study, we compared the DPD time constant of the aorta (aortic RC) and the DPD time constant of the carotid artery (carotid RC) using an in-silico-generated healthy population from a previously validated one-dimensional numerical model of the arterial tree. Our results demonstrated that there is near-absolute agreement between the aortic RC and the carotid RC. In particular, a correlation of ~ 1 was reported for a distribution of aortic/carotid RC values equal to 1.76 ± 0.94 s/1.74 ± 0.87 s. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the DPD of the aortic and the carotid pressure waveform. The findings indicate a strong correlation between carotid DPD and aortic DPD, supported by the examination of curve shape and the diastolic decay time constant across a wide range of simulated cardiovascular conditions. Additional investigation is required to validate these results in human subjects and assess their applicability in vivo.

References

  1. Int J Hypertens. 2017;2017:6265823 [PMID: 29085674]
  2. Aust N Z J Med. 1976;6 suppl 2:49-59 [PMID: 1067827]
  3. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Sep 1;127(3):737-744 [PMID: 31343945]
  4. Ultrasonography. 2017 Apr;36(2):144-152 [PMID: 27776401]
  5. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Aug;101(2):598-608 [PMID: 16849813]
  6. J Appl Physiol. 1956 Mar;8(5):483-94 [PMID: 13295161]
  7. Circ Res. 1974 Jul;35(1):56-66 [PMID: 4366522]
  8. Circulation. 1987 Jul;76(1):32-43 [PMID: 3594773]
  9. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Feb;47(2):131-41 [PMID: 18543011]
  10. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 [PMID: 2868172]
  11. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Nov 1;317(5):H1125-H1133 [PMID: 31538801]
  12. Circulation. 1996 Nov 15;94(10):2497-506 [PMID: 8921794]
  13. Circ Res. 1955 Nov;3(6):623-32 [PMID: 13270378]
  14. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Jul;297(1):H208-22 [PMID: 19429832]
  15. Ann Biomed Eng. 1994 Jul-Aug;22(4):392-7 [PMID: 7998684]
  16. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Nov;32(5):1221-7 [PMID: 9809929]
  17. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Feb;25(2):181-8 [PMID: 10320307]
  18. Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Aug 16;13(8): [PMID: 36014249]
  19. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 15;110(8):1189-94 [PMID: 22770936]
  20. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008 May;222(4):417-28 [PMID: 18595354]
  21. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Nov 1;46(9):1753-60 [PMID: 16256881]
  22. Circulation. 1998 Jul 21;98(3):242-8 [PMID: 9697824]
  23. Am J Physiol. 1995 Apr;268(4 Pt 2):H1540-8 [PMID: 7733355]
  24. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 May 13;9:649866 [PMID: 34055758]
  25. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Mar;1(2):200-9 [PMID: 19356429]
  26. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Jul;24(7):1968-1981 [PMID: 31796418]
  27. Circulation. 1996 Feb 1;93(3):474-83 [PMID: 8565164]

MeSH Term

Humans
Blood Pressure
Aorta
Arterial Pressure
Carotid Arteries
Carotid Artery, Common

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DPDaorticcarotidpressureRCdiastolicstudytimeconstantdecayarterialwaveformbloodcardiovascularresultscorrelationAorticshownconsiderablepathophysiologicalrelevanceassessmentvascularhealthsignificantlyaffectedstiffeningNonethelessrarelyavailablehenceutilitylimitedhandoftenusedsurrogatecentralmonitoringAlthoughtwowaveformsinherentlydifferentunknownwhethersharescommonpatterncomparedaortaarteryusingin-silico-generatedhealthypopulationpreviouslyvalidatedone-dimensionalnumericalmodeltreedemonstratednear-absoluteagreementparticular~ 1reporteddistributionaortic/carotidvaluesequal176 ± 094 s/174 ± 087 sbestknowledgefirstcomparefindingsindicatestrongsupportedexaminationcurveshapeacrosswiderangesimulatedconditionsAdditionalinvestigationrequiredvalidatehumansubjectsassessapplicabilityvivosimilaritydecay:mathematicalmodelling

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)