The ethical challenges of personalized digital health.

Els Maeckelberghe, Kinga Zdunek, Sara Marceglia, Bobbie Farsides, Michael Rigby
Author Information
  1. Els Maeckelberghe: Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  2. Kinga Zdunek: Health Education Unit, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
  3. Sara Marceglia: Faculty of Clinical Engineering, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
  4. Bobbie Farsides: Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
  5. Michael Rigby: School of Social, Political and Global Studies and School of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Personalized digital health systems (pHealth) bring together in sharp juxtaposition very different yet hopefully complementary moral principles in the shared objectives of optimizing health care and the health status of individual citizens while maximizing the application of robust clinical evidence through harnessing powerful and often complex modern data-handling technologies. Principles brought together include respecting the confidentiality of the patient-clinician relationship, the need for controlled information sharing in teamwork and shared care, benefitting from healthcare knowledge obtained from real-world population-level outcomes, and the recognition of different cultures and care settings. This paper outlines the clinical process as enhanced through digital health, reports on the examination of the new issues raised by the computerization of health data, outlines initiatives and policies to balance the harnessing of innovation with control of adverse effects, and emphasizes the importance of the context of use and citizen and user acceptance. The importance of addressing ethical issues throughout the life cycle of design, provision, and use of a pHealth system is explained, and a variety of situation-relevant frameworks are presented to enable a philosophy of responsible innovation, matching the best use of enabling technology with the creation of a culture and context of trustworthiness.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):839 [PMID: 31248395]
  2. Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 May 31;28(3):26 [PMID: 35639210]
  3. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:3-13 [PMID: 27198087]
  4. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Sep 10;16(1):90 [PMID: 30200985]
  5. Yearb Med Inform. 2012;7:7-15 [PMID: 22890335]
  6. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 May 25;6(1):9 [PMID: 30094281]
  7. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Mar;28(3):231-237 [PMID: 30636200]
  8. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(10):817-26 [PMID: 16283471]
  9. Int J Med Inform. 2011 Dec;80(12):815-27 [PMID: 21920809]
  10. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jul;92(7):1057-9 [PMID: 12084677]
  11. Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Dec;23(12):1479-80 [PMID: 16333283]
  12. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Sep 4;273:3-20 [PMID: 33087589]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9): [PMID: 32357446]
  14. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729 [PMID: 16279964]
  15. Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):146-155 [PMID: 30157518]
  16. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1198-202 [PMID: 11604920]
  17. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2021 Jun;51(S1):S47-S52 [PMID: 34185038]
  18. Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:34-46 [PMID: 23974546]
  19. Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Mar 2;46(1):29-41 [PMID: 33256469]
  20. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:1089-1093 [PMID: 32570549]
  21. Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 26;13(1):88 [PMID: 29941011]
  22. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jan;33(1):49-59 [PMID: 25249200]
  23. BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Dec 21;14:55 [PMID: 24359531]
  24. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;183:276-80 [PMID: 23388298]
  25. Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):21-32 [PMID: 33390689]
  26. Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 10;9(1):155 [PMID: 32650823]
  27. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 07;9:802487 [PMID: 35402446]
  28. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 25;9:827253 [PMID: 35402454]
  29. Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(4):298-307 [PMID: 26196349]
  30. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2011;12:217-44 [PMID: 21721939]
  31. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;:186-90 [PMID: 16779027]
  32. Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 20;3:644539 [PMID: 34713114]
  33. Int J Med Inform. 2009 Jan;78(1):1-9 [PMID: 18930696]
  34. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17616 [PMID: 32673218]
  35. J Clin Invest. 2019 Mar 1;129(3):946-948 [PMID: 30688663]
  36. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):354-7 [PMID: 18552646]
  37. J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 10;23(5):e27180 [PMID: 33970123]
  38. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 18;6:83 [PMID: 31058157]
  39. J Med Syst. 2020 Aug 17;44(10):172 [PMID: 32803481]
  40. Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21 [PMID: 28202031]
  41. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;151:427-34 [PMID: 20407176]
  42. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2331-2332 [PMID: 30318263]
  43. Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug;28(1):128-134 [PMID: 31022752]
  44. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:843-7 [PMID: 25160306]
  45. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:458-62 [PMID: 25160226]
  46. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2008 Feb;51(2):151-7 [PMID: 18259708]
  47. Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Oct;12(4):701-15 [PMID: 17199145]
  48. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Oct 27;285:159-164 [PMID: 34734868]
  49. J Biomed Inform. 2013 Jun;46(3):541-62 [PMID: 23305810]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthdigitalcareusepHealthtogetherdifferentsharedclinicalevidenceharnessingoutlinesissuesinnovationimportancecontextethicalpersonalizedPersonalizedsystemsbringsharpjuxtapositionyethopefullycomplementarymoralprinciplesobjectivesoptimizingstatusindividualcitizensmaximizingapplicationrobustpowerfuloftencomplexmoderndata-handlingtechnologiesPrinciplesbroughtincluderespectingconfidentialitypatient-clinicianrelationshipneedcontrolledinformationsharingteamworkbenefittinghealthcareknowledgeobtainedreal-worldpopulation-leveloutcomesrecognitionculturessettingspaperprocessenhancedreportsexaminationnewraisedcomputerizationdatainitiativespoliciesbalancecontroladverseeffectsemphasizescitizenuseracceptanceaddressingthroughoutlifecycledesignprovisionsystemexplainedvarietysituation-relevantframeworkspresentedenablephilosophyresponsiblematchingbestenablingtechnologycreationculturetrustworthinesschallengesconnectivityconsentethicsevaluationpolicytrust

Similar Articles

Cited By