Bias and constructive processes in a self-memory system.

Daniel L Schacter, Ciara M Greene, Gillian Murphy
Author Information
  1. Daniel L Schacter: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  2. Ciara M Greene: School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  3. Gillian Murphy: School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Abstract

Martin Conway's influential theorising about the self-memory system (Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. , (2), 261-288) illuminated how the "working self" influences the construction of autobiographical memories. Moreover, his constructive view of self and memory is compatible with the occurrence of various kinds of errors and distortions in remembering. Here we consider one of the "seven sins" of memory (Schacter, D. L. (2021). . Houghton Mifflin Harcourt) that we believe is most closely related to the operation of Conway's self-memory system: bias, which refers to the role of current knowledge, beliefs, and feelings in shaping and sometimes distorting memories for past experiences and attitudes. More specifically, we discuss recent research on three forms of bias - consistency, self-enhancing, and positivity biases - that illuminate their role in influencing how people remember the past and also imagine the future. We consider both theoretical and applied aspects of these biases and, consistent with Conway's perspective, argue that despite sometimes contributing to inaccuracies, bias also serves adaptive functions.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):528-33 [PMID: 26030169]
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Aug;59(2):229-41 [PMID: 2213492]
  3. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Mar;30(1):33-47 [PMID: 37902694]
  4. Psychol Aging. 2011 Sep;26(3):625-30 [PMID: 21443350]
  5. Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;30(10):1449-1459 [PMID: 31432746]
  6. Memory. 2024 Jan-Feb;32(1):25-40 [PMID: 37930782]
  7. Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604 [PMID: 33971789]
  8. Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):261-88 [PMID: 10789197]
  9. Memory. 2023 Jan;31(1):137-146 [PMID: 36170037]
  10. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):773-86 [PMID: 17395575]
  11. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Dec 4;5(1):63 [PMID: 33275199]
  12. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Dec;27(4):773-784 [PMID: 34110860]
  13. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:450-7 [PMID: 26142352]
  14. Neuron. 2012 Nov 21;76(4):677-94 [PMID: 23177955]
  15. Hum Neurobiol. 1985;4(3):127-36 [PMID: 3905726]
  16. Memory. 2004 Jul;12(4):525-31 [PMID: 15487548]
  17. Am Psychol. 1993 May;48(5):518-37 [PMID: 8507050]
  18. Memory. 2022 Jan;30(1):55-59 [PMID: 33998367]
  19. Cogn Emot. 2021 Aug;35(5):936-955 [PMID: 33829942]
  20. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;22(1):3-31 [PMID: 28132598]
  21. Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):800-815 [PMID: 27637938]
  22. Emotion. 2022 Mar;22(2):227-243 [PMID: 34748363]
  23. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Sep;20(5):1063-87 [PMID: 7931095]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):854-78 [PMID: 22889074]
  25. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;29(3):316-323 [PMID: 32968336]
  26. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Sep 1;77(9):1645-1653 [PMID: 35099009]
  27. Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 6;21(23):R941-5 [PMID: 22153158]
  28. Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 29;11(1):2100 [PMID: 32350253]
  29. Neurocase. 2007 Feb;13(1):6-15 [PMID: 17454684]
  30. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;5(2):142-62 [PMID: 26162121]
  31. Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):68-100 [PMID: 7878163]
  32. Psychol Rev. 2013 Oct;120(4):852-72 [PMID: 24219851]
  33. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021 Jan 4;72:1-36 [PMID: 32928060]
  34. Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):24-9 [PMID: 22138157]
  35. Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):261-269 [PMID: 33507125]
  36. Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):76-86 [PMID: 30141171]
  37. Am Psychol. 1999 Mar;54(3):182-203 [PMID: 10199218]
  38. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 May;54(5):890-902 [PMID: 3379585]
  39. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Mar;72(3):508-522 [PMID: 29364056]
  40. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(11):1356-63 [PMID: 23044797]
  41. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1429-41 [PMID: 18304591]
  42. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2022 Oct 04;: [PMID: 36250192]
  43. Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):936-946 [PMID: 29648928]
  44. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):467-74 [PMID: 21908231]
  45. Memory. 2014;22(4):307-22 [PMID: 23547686]
  46. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(2):351-60 [PMID: 26329492]
  47. Psychol Bull. 1997 May;121(3):371-94 [PMID: 9136641]
  48. Memory. 2003 Mar;11(2):137-49 [PMID: 12820827]
  49. Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):1110-6 [PMID: 25774640]

Grants

  1. R01 AG008441/NIA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Bias
Memory, Episodic
Mental Recall
Self Concept

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0biasself-memorysystemConway'sautobiographicalmemoriesmemoryconstructionconstructiveconsiderrolesometimespast-consistencyself-enhancingpositivitybiasesalsoMartininfluentialtheorisingConwayMA&Pleydell-PearceCW20002261-288illuminated"workingself"influencesMoreoverviewselfcompatibleoccurrencevariouskindserrorsdistortionsrememberingone"sevensins"SchacterDL2021HoughtonMifflinHarcourtbelievecloselyrelatedoperationsystem:referscurrentknowledgebeliefsfeelingsshapingdistortingexperiencesattitudesspecificallydiscussrecentresearchthreeformsilluminateinfluencingpeoplerememberimaginefuturetheoreticalappliedaspectsconsistentperspectivearguedespitecontributinginaccuraciesservesadaptivefunctionsBiasprocessesSelf-memory

Similar Articles

Cited By