Some Design Considerations in Passive Indoor Positioning Systems.

Jimmy Engstr��m, ��se Jevinger, Carl Magnus Olsson, Jan A Persson
Author Information
  1. Jimmy Engstr��m: Sony Europe B.V., 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
  2. ��se Jevinger: Internet of Things and People Research Center, Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malm�� University, 205 06 Malm��, Sweden. ORCID
  3. Carl Magnus Olsson: Internet of Things and People Research Center, Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malm�� University, 205 06 Malm��, Sweden.
  4. Jan A Persson: Internet of Things and People Research Center, Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Malm�� University, 205 06 Malm��, Sweden. ORCID

Abstract

User location is becoming an increasingly common and important feature for a wide range of services. Smartphone owners increasingly use location-based services, as service providers add context-enhanced functionality such as car-driving routes, COVID-19 tracking, crowdedness indicators, and suggestions for nearby points of interest. However, positioning a user indoors is still problematic due to the fading of the radio signal caused by multipath and shadowing, where both have complex dependencies on the indoor environment. Location fingerprinting is a common positioning method where Radio Signal Strength (RSS) measurements are compared to a reference database of previously stored RSS values. Due to the size of the reference databases, these are often stored in the cloud. However, server-side positioning computations make preserving the user's privacy problematic. Given the assumption that a user does not want to communicate his/her location, we pose the question of whether a passive system with client-side computations can substitute fingerprinting-based systems, which commonly use active communication with a server. We compared two passive indoor location systems based on multilateration and sensor fusion using an Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) with fingerprinting and show how these may provide accurate indoor positioning without compromising the user's privacy in a busy office environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 08;19(19): [PMID: 31597391]
  2. SN Comput Sci. 2021;2(3):136 [PMID: 33728414]
  3. Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362 [PMID: 32939066]
  4. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 14;20(4): [PMID: 32074980]
  5. IEEE Access. 2020 Aug 31;8:159402-159414 [PMID: 34786286]
  6. Sensors (Basel). 2016 Aug 31;16(9): [PMID: 27589763]
  7. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1376 [PMID: 23524645]
  8. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 13;17(10): [PMID: 29027948]
  9. Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 26;18(6): [PMID: 29861460]

Grants

  1. 20170211/Foundation for Knowledge

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0positioningindoorlocationfingerprintingprivacyincreasinglycommonservicesuseHoweveruserproblematicenvironmentRSScomparedreferencestoredcomputationsuser'spassivesystemsmultilaterationUserbecomingimportantfeaturewiderangeSmartphoneownerslocation-basedserviceprovidersaddcontext-enhancedfunctionalitycar-drivingroutesCOVID-19trackingcrowdednessindicatorssuggestionsnearbypointsinterestindoorsstillduefadingradiosignalcausedmultipathshadowingcomplexdependenciesLocationmethodRadioSignalStrengthmeasurementsdatabasepreviouslyvaluesDuesizedatabasesoftencloudserver-sidemakepreservingGivenassumptionwantcommunicatehis/herposequestionwhethersystemclient-sidecansubstitutefingerprinting-basedcommonlyactivecommunicationservertwobasedsensorfusionusingUnscentedKalmanFilterUKFshowmayprovideaccuratewithoutcompromisingbusyofficeDesignConsiderationsPassiveIndoorPositioningSystemsBLERSSI

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.