Costs of reproduction are present but latent in eusocial bumblebee queens.

David H Collins, David C Prince, Jenny L Donelan, Tracey Chapman, Andrew F G Bourke
Author Information
  1. David H Collins: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. David.Collins@uea.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. David C Prince: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
  3. Jenny L Donelan: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
  4. Tracey Chapman: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
  5. Andrew F G Bourke: School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard evolutionary theory of ageing proposes that ageing occurs because of a trade-off between reproduction and longevity. Eusocial insect queens exhibit positive fecundity-longevity associations and so have been suggested to be counter-examples through not expressing costs of reproduction and through remodelling conserved genetic and endocrine networks regulating ageing and reproduction. If so, eusocial evolution from solitary ancestors with negative fecundity-longevity associations must have involved a stage at which costs of reproduction were suppressed and fecundity and longevity became positively associated. Using the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris), we experimentally tested whether queens in annual eusocial insects at an intermediate level of eusocial complexity experience costs of reproduction, and, using mRNA-seq, the extent to which they exhibit a remodelling of relevant genetic and endocrine networks. Specifically, we tested whether costs of reproduction are present but latent, or whether a remodelling of relevant genetic and endocrine networks has already occurred allowing queens to reproduce without costs.
RESULTS: We experimentally increased queens' costs of reproduction by removing their eggs, which caused queens to increase their egg-laying rate. Treatment queens had significantly reduced longevity relative to control queens whose egg-laying rate was not increased. Reduced longevity in treatment queens was not caused by increased worker-to-queen aggression or by increased overall activity in queens. In addition, treatment and control queens differed in age-related gene expression based on mRNA-seq in both their overall expression profiles and the expression of ageing-related genes. Remarkably, these differences appeared to occur principally with respect to relative age, not chronological age.
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first simultaneously phenotypic and transcriptomic experimental test for a longevity cost of reproduction in eusocial insect queens. The results support the occurrence of costs of reproduction in annual eusocial insects of intermediate social complexity and suggest that reproductive costs are present but latent in queens of such species, i.e. that these queens exhibit condition-dependent positive fecundity-longevity associations. They also raise the possibility that a partial remodelling of genetic and endocrine networks underpinning ageing may have occurred in intermediately eusocial species such that, in unmanipulated conditions, age-related gene expression depends more on chronological than relative age.

Keywords

References

  1. Nature. 1977 Nov 24;270(5635):301-4 [PMID: 593350]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 26;376(1823):20190732 [PMID: 33678022]
  3. OMICS. 2012 May;16(5):284-7 [PMID: 22455463]
  4. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0137969 [PMID: 26383861]
  5. Age (Dordr). 2011 Mar;33(1):69-80 [PMID: 20607427]
  6. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e68136 [PMID: 23826372]
  7. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Aug;16:28-35 [PMID: 27720047]
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 22;266(1437):2465-9 [PMID: 10693816]
  9. Oecologia. 2017 Jun;184(2):305-315 [PMID: 28361244]
  10. Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Jun 8;13(6): [PMID: 33944936]
  11. J Theor Biol. 1966 Sep;12(1):12-45 [PMID: 6015424]
  12. Am Nat. 2020 Nov;196(5):525-540 [PMID: 33064587]
  13. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Aug;16:vii-x [PMID: 27720060]
  14. Bioinformatics. 2012 Aug 15;28(16):2184-5 [PMID: 22743226]
  15. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 21;13(12):e0209405 [PMID: 30576353]
  16. BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Mar 11;14(1):45 [PMID: 24618396]
  17. Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Dec;32(12):3173-85 [PMID: 26341296]
  18. J Evol Biol. 2009 May;22(5):983-96 [PMID: 19298495]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 7;272(1568):1145-52 [PMID: 16024376]
  20. Sci Rep. 2013 Dec 16;3:3512 [PMID: 24336499]
  21. Am Nat. 2019 Feb;193(2):256-266 [PMID: 30720369]
  22. J Mol Biol. 2017 Aug 4;429(16):2427-2437 [PMID: 28684248]
  23. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550 [PMID: 25516281]
  24. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):525-7 [PMID: 27043002]
  25. Bioinformatics. 2014 Feb 01;30(3):301-4 [PMID: 24319002]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 25;286(1911):20191604 [PMID: 31530150]
  27. Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 12;20(18):3710-5 [PMID: 15297299]
  28. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 26;376(1823):20190736 [PMID: 33678017]
  29. Genome Res. 2007 Aug;17(8):1236-43 [PMID: 17623811]
  30. Mol Ecol. 2015 Jun;24(12):3043-63 [PMID: 25913260]
  31. Evol Biol. 2017;44(1):5-10 [PMID: 28280278]
  32. J Anim Ecol. 2015 May;84(3):615-624 [PMID: 25646973]
  33. Am Nat. 2017 Apr;189(4):436-442 [PMID: 28350504]
  34. Evolution. 2012 May;66(5):1322-31 [PMID: 22519774]
  35. BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 14;19(1):423 [PMID: 30428853]
  36. Curr Biol. 2016 Jul 11;26(13):R577-R586 [PMID: 27404253]
  37. F1000Res. 2015 Dec 30;4:1521 [PMID: 26925227]
  38. Bioinformatics. 2010 Apr 1;26(7):976-8 [PMID: 20179076]
  39. Mol Ecol. 2020 Feb;29(4):720-737 [PMID: 31971312]
  40. Elife. 2022 Apr 06;11: [PMID: 35384839]
  41. Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3047-8 [PMID: 27312411]
  42. Mol Ecol. 2007 Nov;16(22):4837-48 [PMID: 17927707]
  43. BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 22;18(1):640 [PMID: 28830340]
  44. Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):238 [PMID: 31727128]
  45. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1083-D1090 [PMID: 29121237]
  46. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Aug;16:64-68 [PMID: 27720052]
  47. BMC Genomics. 2012 May 04;13:167 [PMID: 22559237]
  48. Genome Biol. 2015 Apr 24;16:76 [PMID: 25908251]
  49. J Evol Biol. 2015 Dec;28(12):2349-54 [PMID: 26348543]
  50. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):421-425 [PMID: 10998520]
  51. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Aug;16:1-8 [PMID: 27720042]
  52. Evolution. 2003 Oct;57(10):2424-9 [PMID: 14628930]
  53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 24;104(17):7128-33 [PMID: 17438290]
  54. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 [PMID: 9254694]
  55. Exp Gerontol. 2016 May;77:52-61 [PMID: 26883339]
  56. Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60 [PMID: 25751142]
  57. Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 22;4(1):384 [PMID: 33753888]
  58. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 26;376(1823):20190737 [PMID: 33678021]
  59. Mol Ecol. 2021 Feb;30(3):718-735 [PMID: 33238067]
  60. Cell. 2014 Nov 6;159(4):829-43 [PMID: 25417159]
  61. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 26;376(1823):20190727 [PMID: 33678019]
  62. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Aug;16:95-103 [PMID: 27720058]
  63. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2117:207-215 [PMID: 31960380]
  64. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 26;376(1823):20190728 [PMID: 33678016]
  65. J Insect Physiol. 2016 Dec;95:1-7 [PMID: 27614175]
  66. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35201 [PMID: 22509399]
  67. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 12;284(1858): [PMID: 28701554]

Grants

  1. BB/T017864/1/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

MeSH Term

Bees
Animals
Reproduction
Fertility
Aging
Longevity
RNA, Messenger

Chemicals

RNA, Messenger

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0queensreproductioncostseusocialageinglongevityexpressionremodellinggeneticendocrinenetworksincreasedexhibitfecundity-longevityassociationswhethermRNA-seqpresentlatentrelativegeneagetheoryinsectpositivebumblebeeBombusterrestrisexperimentallytestedannualinsectsintermediatecomplexityrelevantoccurredcausedegg-layingratecontroltreatmentoverallage-relatedchronologicalspeciesCostsBACKGROUND:standardevolutionaryproposesoccurstrade-offEusocialsuggestedcounter-examplesexpressingconservedregulatingevolutionsolitaryancestorsnegativemustinvolvedstagesuppressedfecunditybecamepositivelyassociatedUsinglevelexperienceusingextentSpecificallyalreadyallowingreproducewithoutRESULTS:queens'removingeggsincreaseTreatmentsignificantlyreducedwhoseReducedworker-to-queenaggressionactivityadditiondifferedbasedprofilesageing-relatedgenesRemarkablydifferencesappearedoccurprincipallyrespectCONCLUSIONS:studyrepresentsfirstsimultaneouslyphenotypictranscriptomicexperimentaltestcostresultssupportoccurrencesocialsuggestreproductiveiecondition-dependentalsoraisepossibilitypartialunderpinningmayintermediatelyunmanipulatedconditionsdependsAge-relatedEusocialityEvolutionary

Similar Articles

Cited By