A complex intervention on vaccination uptake among older adults (≥ 60 years) in Germany - a study protocol with a mixed methods design.

Sarah A K Uthoff, Anna Zinkevich, Dominika Franiel, Maike Below, Helene Splieth, Julia Iwen, Marc Biedermann, Dorothee Heinemeier, Lena Ansmann
Author Information
  1. Sarah A K Uthoff: Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstrasse 140, 29123, Oldenburg, Germany. sarah.uthoff@uni-oldenburg.de.
  2. Anna Zinkevich: Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstrasse 140, 29123, Oldenburg, Germany.
  3. Dominika Franiel: Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany, Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
  4. Maike Below: Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany, Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
  5. Helene Splieth: Association of Substitute Health Funds (Vdek) e.V, Askanischer Platz 1, 10963, Berlin, Germany.
  6. Julia Iwen: Association of Substitute Health Funds (Vdek) e.V, Askanischer Platz 1, 10963, Berlin, Germany.
  7. Marc Biedermann: The National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 2, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
  8. Dorothee Heinemeier: Communication Lab Erfurt, Bahnhofstraße. 16/Büßleber Gasse, 99084, Erfurt, Germany.
  9. Lena Ansmann: Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerlaender Heerstrasse 140, 29123, Oldenburg, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current uptake of many vaccinations recommended for persons aged 60 and older is unsatisfactory in Germany. Lack of confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccinations, lack of knowledge and insecurities about possible side effects, and numerous pragmatic barriers are just some of the reasons to be mentioned. General practitioners (GPs) play a central role in the vaccination process. Therefore, effective interventions in this context are needed to address the various barriers and improve the vaccination uptake rates.
METHODS: A complex intervention will be implemented and evaluated in 1057 GPs' practices in two German federal states. The components include trainings for GPs and medical assistants on communication psychology, medical aspects, and organisational vaccination processes. The primary outcome influenza vaccination rate and the secondary outcomes vaccination uptake rate of other vaccinations as well as vaccine literacy of patients will be examined. The intervention will be evaluated in a mixed methods study with a controlled design. Survey data will be analysed descriptively and by using mean comparisons as well as multivariable multilevel analyses. The qualitative data will be analysed with qualitative content analysis. The secondary data will be analysed by using descriptive statistics, a pre-post comparison by performing mean comparisons, cluster analysis, and subgroup analyses.
DISCUSSION: In this study, a complex intervention to improve vaccination rates in GP practices for the vaccinations recommended for people aged 60 years and older will be implemented and evaluated. Additionally, improvements in patients' vaccine-related health literacy and knowledge, and patients' intention to get vaccinated are expected. The mixed methods design can deliver results that can be used to improve preventive health care for elderly people and to gain more knowledge on vaccination uptake and the intervention's effectiveness.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: DRKS00027252 (retrospectively registered).

Keywords

Associated Data

DRKS | DRKS00027252

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 04;16:121 [PMID: 26846202]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1491-3 [PMID: 20587722]
  3. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jul;51(5):585-596 [PMID: 29951833]
  4. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Sep;32(9):1821-1828 [PMID: 31606859]
  5. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008 Jan;58(1):5-15 [PMID: 17429761]
  6. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jan;95(1):169-183 [PMID: 31902413]
  7. Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407 [PMID: 23975761]
  8. J Infect Dis. 2005 Aug 1;192(3):377-86 [PMID: 15995950]
  9. BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 29;17:98 [PMID: 27473612]
  10. J Health Commun. 2016;21(4):439-56 [PMID: 26953782]
  11. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2019 Apr;62(4):400-409 [PMID: 30805674]
  12. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 21;12:154 [PMID: 22998654]
  13. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0276008 [PMID: 36251715]
  14. Vaccine. 2012 May 28;30(25):3771-7 [PMID: 22445808]
  15. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Aug;19(8):1197-209 [PMID: 20593203]
  16. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655 [PMID: 18824488]
  17. BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;20(1):359 [PMID: 32188428]
  18. MMW Fortschr Med. 2014 Mar 27;156 Spec No 1(1):27-30; quiz 31-2 [PMID: 24930344]
  19. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208601 [PMID: 30532274]
  20. BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258 [PMID: 25791983]
  21. J Health Commun. 2018;23(4):313-320 [PMID: 29474117]
  22. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):100-6 [PMID: 19836187]
  23. Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 7;136(9):641-51 [PMID: 11992299]
  24. Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705 [PMID: 15528286]
  25. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 10;10(3):e034869 [PMID: 32161160]
  26. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019 Mar 14;52:e20180366 [PMID: 30892550]
  27. Sao Paulo Med J. 2020 Jul-Aug;138(4):322-325 [PMID: 32638940]
  28. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 24;9(12): [PMID: 34960137]
  29. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 20;13:22 [PMID: 22433118]
  30. BMJ. 2013 Aug 23;347:f5061 [PMID: 23974637]
  31. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Jan;65:101205 [PMID: 33137510]
  32. Ann Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;10(6):538-46 [PMID: 23149531]
  33. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170550 [PMID: 28125629]
  34. Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 28;10(6): [PMID: 35746473]

MeSH Term

Aged
Humans
Middle Aged
Allied Health Personnel
General Practitioners
Influenza Vaccines
Influenza, Human
Vaccination

Chemicals

Influenza Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccinationwilluptakevaccinationsinterventionolderknowledgeimprovecomplexevaluatedmixedmethodsstudydesigndataanalysedhealthcarerecommendedaged60GermanybarriersGeneralGPsratesimplementedpracticesmedicalratesecondarywellliteracyusingmeancomparisonsanalysesqualitativeanalysispeopleyearspatients'canBACKGROUND:currentmanypersonsunsatisfactoryLackconfidencesafetyefficacylackinsecuritiespossiblesideeffectsnumerouspragmaticjustreasonsmentionedpractitionersplaycentralroleprocessThereforeeffectiveinterventionscontextneededaddressvariousMETHODS:1057GPs'twoGermanfederalstatescomponentsincludetrainingsassistantscommunicationpsychologyaspectsorganisationalprocessesprimaryoutcomeinfluenzaoutcomesvaccinepatientsexaminedcontrolledSurveydescriptivelymultivariablemultilevelcontentdescriptivestatisticspre-postcomparisonperformingclustersubgroupDISCUSSION:GPAdditionallyimprovementsvaccine-relatedintentiongetvaccinatedexpecteddeliverresultsusedpreventiveelderlygainintervention'seffectivenessTRIALREGISTRATION:Trialregistrationnumber:DRKS00027252retrospectivelyregisteredamongadults≥ 60-protocolElderlypracticeInfluenzaPreventivePrimaryVaccination

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)